H2H data updated: 2026-10-30 00:00 UTC

Dana Gilbert vs Kay Mcdaniel H2H: 0-1

Kay Mcdaniel holds a 1–0 lead over Dana Gilbert in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kay Mcdaniel leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kay Mcdaniel won the 1979 Canadian Open round of 16 6-2 6-2.

H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kay Mcdaniel 6-2 6-2 Dana Gilbert Match data Aug 17, 1979* R16 Canadian Open WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Dana Gilbert — — — 1,712 61 79 43.6% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Kay Mcdaniel — — — 1,653 18 41 30.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Dana Gilbert Kay Mcdaniel
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1974 2–1 66.7% — 1,515 0 0
17 1977 1–1 50.0% — 1,509 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1978 8–5 61.5% — 1,613 0 1 1976 0–1 0.0% — 1,498 0 0
19 1979 3–13 18.8% — 1,554 0 1 1977 0–1 0.0% — 1,485 0 0
20 1980 14–12 53.8% — 1,664 0 2 1978 2–2 50.0% — 1,519 0 0
21 1981 6–12 33.3% — 1,612 0 2 1979 10–12 45.5% — 1,625 0 0
22 1982 20–15 57.1% — 1,664 0 2 1980 2–13 13.3% — 1,547 0 0
23 1983 9–21 30.0% — 1,540 0 2 1981 0–2 0.0% — 1,521 0 0
24 — — — — — — — 1982 1–3 25.0% — 1,495 0 0
27 — — — — — — — 1985 1–2 33.3% — 1,479 0 0
28 — — — — — — — 1986 0–3 0.0% — 1,449 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 1987 0–1 0.0% — 1,443 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Dana Gilbert Kay Mcdaniel
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
17 1977 — — — — — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1978 2 4 6 33.3% 6 0 6 100.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1979 2 6 8 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1980 6 5 11 54.5% 8 4 12 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1978 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1981 3 4 7 42.9% 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1979 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 4 6 33.3%
22 1982 7 5 12 58.3% 13 9 22 59.1% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1980 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0%
23 1983 5 9 14 35.7% 4 11 15 26.7% — — — — — — — — 1981 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 25 33 58 43.1% 35 33 68 51.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 9 10 10.0% — 7 13 20 35.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 5 7 12 41.7% 2 10 12 16.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Dana Gilbert Kay Mcdaniel
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 1516 99.4 — — — — — +25 — 57.1% -0.28 1–0 — — +0.34
17 1977 1509 98.0 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.00 1–0 — — +0.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1978 1614 120.1 — — — — -32 +64 — 58.6% +0.21 2–1 (67%) 2–1 (67%) 103.0 +0.46 1976 1498 99.0 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 0–1 — 0.00
19 1979 1555 110.1 — — — — -25 +142 — 22.2% -2.20 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — +0.72 1977 1486 99.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.05
20 1980 1664 123.8 — — — — -110 +96 — 54.8% +0.37 4–8 (33%) 4–0 (100%) 100.9 +0.95 1978 1519 108.0 — — — — +99 — — 55.6% +0.78 0–1 0–1 — +0.17
21 1981 1613 104.6 — — — — -27 +80 — 34.9% -1.44 4–3 (57%) 1–1 — +0.32 1979 1625 126.6 — — — — +20 — +26 43.4% -0.57 6–3 (67%) 4–1 (80%) 109.0 +0.40
22 1982 1664 118.3 — — — — -83 +48 — 56.6% +0.49 6–7 (46%) 4–5 (44%) 98.6 +2.24 1980 1547 99.3 — — — — -28 — +43 22.9% -2.23 1–4 (20%) 2–0 — -0.28
23 1983 1540 101.0 — — — — +29 +72 — 34.3% -1.46 4–6 (40%) 3–1 (75%) — +1.43 1981 1522 94.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.25 — — — -0.07
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1496 104.3 — — — — +12 — — 40.0% -0.30 0–2 1–1 — +0.49
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1480 96.2 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 — 1–0 — +0.03
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1449 95.8 — — — — — — — 14.3% -2.14 0–1 — — +0.25
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1443 100.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — 0.00
Career — 1712 116.0 — — — — -43 +72 — 44.8% -0.54 23–27 (46%) 15–9 (63%) 104.4 +4.67 — 1653 110.5 — — — — +12 +25 +31 34.8% -1.17 8–12 (40%) 8–4 (67%) 102.5 +2.17

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.