H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Daniela Hantuchova vs Amanda Coetzer H2H: 2-1
Daniela Hantuchova holds a 2–1 lead over Amanda Coetzer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Daniela Hantuchova leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Amanda Coetzer won the 2003 Indian Wells fourth round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SVK
Age 43
Right-Handed
181 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
RSA
Age 54
Right-Handed
158 cm / 5'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 9, 2003* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R16 | Hard | Amanda Coetzer | 6-4 6-4 | Daniela Hantuchova | Match data |
| Aug 16, 2002* | Montreal | WTA 1000 | R16 | Hard | Daniela Hantuchova | 6-1 6-3 | Amanda Coetzer | Match data |
| Feb 23, 2001* | Oklahoma City | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Daniela Hantuchova | 7-6(0) 3-6 6-0 | Amanda Coetzer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniela Hantuchova | #317 | #5 | 2,897 | 1,968 | 457 | 361 | 55.9% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 7 |
| Amanda Coetzer | #289 | #3 | 3,380 | 2,051 | 491 | 307 | 61.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 9 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Daniela Hantuchova | Amanda Coetzer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #197 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #152 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2000 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #108 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #63 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2001 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #38 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #76 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2002 | 48–24 | 66.7% | #8 | 1,919 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #68 | 1,686 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2003 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #19 | 1,753 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 35–15 | 70.0% | #17 | 1,857 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2004 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #31 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 42–18 | 70.0% | #15 | 1,991 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2005 | 38–25 | 60.3% | #19 | 1,877 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 38–19 | 66.7% | #18 | 1,885 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2006 | 35–25 | 58.3% | #17 | 1,860 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #19 | 1,910 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2007 | 52–26 | 66.7% | #9 | 1,930 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #14 | 1,863 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2008 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #21 | 1,756 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 60–25 | 70.6% | #4 | 2,013 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2009 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #24 | 1,807 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #17 | 1,887 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 2010 | 32–24 | 57.1% | #30 | 1,780 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #11 | 1,815 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 2011 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #24 | 1,790 | 0 | 4 | 2000 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #12 | 1,892 | 0 | 7 |
| 29 | 2012 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #32 | 1,686 | 0 | 5 | 2001 | 32–21 | 60.4% | #19 | 1,786 | 0 | 8 |
| 30 | 2013 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #33 | 1,683 | 0 | 6 | 2002 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #21 | 1,795 | 0 | 8 |
| 31 | 2014 | 16–24 | 40.0% | #62 | 1,577 | 0 | 6 | 2003 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #25 | 1,738 | 0 | 9 |
| 32 | 2015 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #83 | 1,574 | 0 | 7 | 2004 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #286 | 1,718 | 0 | 9 |
| 33 | 2016 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #228 | 1,514 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2017 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #317 | 1,524 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |