H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Daniela Hantuchova vs Amy Frazier H2H: 2-1

Daniela Hantuchova holds a 2–1 lead over Amy Frazier in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Daniela Hantuchova leads 2–0 on grass, while Amy Frazier leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Daniela Hantuchova won the 2004 Eastbourne third round 7-5 3-6 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Daniela Hantuchova
SVK Age 43 Right-Handed 181 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Amy Frazier
USA Age 53 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 17, 2004* Eastbourne WTA 500 R32 Grass Daniela Hantuchova #54 7-5 3-6 6-2 Amy Frazier #33 Match data
Jul 25, 2003* Stanford WTA 500 R16 Hard Amy Frazier #46 6-2 6-4 Daniela Hantuchova #9 Match data
Jun 22, 2002* Eastbourne WTA 500 QF Grass Daniela Hantuchova #13 7-6(4) 6-1 Amy Frazier #76 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Daniela Hantuchova #317 #5 2,897 1,968 457 361 55.9% 0 2 0 1 4 7
Amy Frazier #450 #13 1,381 1,959 416 307 57.5% 0 0 0 3 5 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Daniela Hantuchova Amy Frazier
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1987 3–4 42.9% #147 1,527 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1988 12–15 44.4% #58 1,638 0 0
16 1999 0–1 0.0% #197 1,494 0 0 1989 23–15 60.5% #33 1,725 0 1
17 2000 6–7 46.2% #108 1,551 0 0 1990 31–14 68.9% #16 1,893 0 2
18 2001 19–16 54.3% #38 1,710 0 0 1991 25–18 58.1% #28 1,813 0 2
19 2002 48–24 66.7% #8 1,919 0 1 1992 33–17 66.0% #19 1,842 0 3
20 2003 26–23 53.1% #19 1,753 0 1 1993 10–9 52.6% #39 1,843 0 3
21 2004 24–24 50.0% #31 1,714 0 1 1994 28–15 65.1% #16 1,903 0 4
22 2005 38–25 60.3% #19 1,877 0 1 1995 26–15 63.4% #18 1,877 0 5
23 2006 35–25 58.3% #17 1,860 0 1 1996 20–16 55.6% #33 1,835 0 5
24 2007 52–26 66.7% #9 1,930 0 3 1997 17–17 50.0% #37 1,818 0 5
25 2008 21–19 52.5% #21 1,756 0 3 1998 12–13 48.0% #42 1,766 0 5
26 2009 37–24 60.7% #24 1,807 0 3 1999 31–19 62.0% #19 1,876 0 6
27 2010 32–24 57.1% #30 1,780 0 3 2000 30–22 57.7% #20 1,852 0 6
28 2011 41–25 62.1% #24 1,790 0 4 2001 19–19 50.0% #48 1,695 0 6
29 2012 22–22 50.0% #32 1,686 0 5 2002 19–18 51.4% #39 1,757 0 6
30 2013 23–24 48.9% #33 1,683 0 6 2003 14–13 51.9% #61 1,746 0 6
31 2014 16–24 40.0% #62 1,577 0 6 2004 35–17 67.3% #26 1,828 0 7
32 2015 15–19 44.1% #83 1,574 0 7 2005 18–16 52.9% #52 1,730 0 8
33 2016 1–8 11.1% #228 1,514 0 7 2006 10–15 40.0% #130 1,626 0 8
34 2017 1–1 50.0% #317 1,524 0 7 — — — — — — —