H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Daniela Hantuchova vs Barbara Schett H2H: 7-0

Daniela Hantuchova holds a 7–0 lead over Barbara Schett in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Daniela Hantuchova leads 6–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Daniela Hantuchova won the 2005 Australian Open second round 6-4 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Daniela Hantuchova
SVK Age 43 Right-Handed 181 cm / 5'11"
H2H
7 – 0
7 main draw meetings
Barbara Schett
AUT Age 50 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 20, 2005* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Daniela Hantuchova #31 6-4 6-0 Barbara Schett #97 Match data
May 8, 2003* Berlin WTA 1000 R32 Clay Daniela Hantuchova #9 6-3 4-6 6-3 Barbara Schett #55 Match data
Oct 25, 2002* Linz WTA 500 R16 Hard Daniela Hantuchova #9 6-1 7-5 Barbara Schett #43 Match data
Oct 11, 2002* Filderstadt WTA 500 R16 Hard Daniela Hantuchova #11 7-5 6-1 Barbara Schett #44 Match data
Aug 17, 2002* Montreal WTA 1000 QF Hard Daniela Hantuchova #12 6-3 6-3 Barbara Schett #35 Match data
Mar 9, 2002* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R32 Hard Daniela Hantuchova #26 5-7 6-3 6-1 Barbara Schett #22 Match data
Oct 19, 2001* Zurich WTA 1000 R16 Hard Daniela Hantuchova #53 6-1 7-6(5) Barbara Schett #20 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Daniela Hantuchova #317 #5 2,897 1,968 457 361 55.9% 0 2 0 1 4 7
Barbara Schett #97 #7 2,188 1,975 256 227 53.0% 0 0 0 1 2 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Daniela Hantuchova Barbara Schett
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1991 0–1 0.0% — 1,491 0 0
16 1999 0–1 0.0% #197 1,494 0 0 1992 0–1 0.0% #290 1,487 0 0
17 2000 6–7 46.2% #108 1,551 0 0 1993 4–4 50.0% #137 1,547 0 0
18 2001 19–16 54.3% #38 1,710 0 0 1994 9–14 39.1% #100 1,531 0 0
19 2002 48–24 66.7% #8 1,919 0 1 1995 8–10 44.4% #83 1,585 0 0
20 2003 26–23 53.1% #19 1,753 0 1 1996 23–18 56.1% #32 1,759 0 1
21 2004 24–24 50.0% #31 1,714 0 1 1997 22–20 52.4% #38 1,762 0 2
22 2005 38–25 60.3% #19 1,877 0 1 1998 34–26 56.7% #23 1,822 0 2
23 2006 35–25 58.3% #17 1,860 0 1 1999 46–23 66.7% #8 1,936 0 2
24 2007 52–26 66.7% #9 1,930 0 3 2000 27–22 55.1% #22 1,815 0 3
25 2008 21–19 52.5% #21 1,756 0 3 2001 29–25 53.7% #21 1,757 0 3
26 2009 37–24 60.7% #24 1,807 0 3 2002 24–20 54.5% #40 1,750 0 3
27 2010 32–24 57.1% #30 1,780 0 3 2003 15–24 38.5% #76 1,624 0 3
28 2011 41–25 62.1% #24 1,790 0 4 2004 14–18 43.8% #90 1,590 0 3
29 2012 22–22 50.0% #32 1,686 0 5 2005 1–1 50.0% #97 1,591 0 3
30 2013 23–24 48.9% #33 1,683 0 6 — — — — — — —
31 2014 16–24 40.0% #62 1,577 0 6 — — — — — — —
32 2015 15–19 44.1% #83 1,574 0 7 — — — — — — —
33 2016 1–8 11.1% #228 1,514 0 7 — — — — — — —
34 2017 1–1 50.0% #317 1,524 0 7 — — — — — — —