H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Daniela Hantuchova vs Bianka Lamade H2H: 1-0

Daniela Hantuchova holds a 1–0 lead over Bianka Lamade in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Daniela Hantuchova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Daniela Hantuchova won the 2002 Gold Coast round of 32 6-1 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Daniela Hantuchova
SVK Age 43 Right-Handed 181 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Bianka Lamade
GER Age 44 Right-Handed 184 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Daniela Hantuchova #38 6-1 7-5 Bianka Lamade #67 Match data Jan 2, 2002* R32 Gold Coast Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Daniela Hantuchova #317 #5 2,897 1,968 461 365 55.8% 0 2 0 1 4 7
Bianka Lamade #1,261 #59 538 1,668 21 28 42.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Daniela Hantuchova Bianka Lamade
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1999 0–1 0.0% #197 1,494 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2000 6–7 46.2% #108 1,550 0 0 2000 3–2 60.0% #126 1,542 0 0
18 2001 19–16 54.3% #38 1,710 0 0 2001 14–12 53.8% #67 1,627 0 1
19 2002 48–24 66.7% #8 1,919 0 1 2002 4–13 23.5% #223 1,537 0 1
20 2003 26–23 53.1% #19 1,751 0 1 2003 0–1 0.0% #178 1,527 0 1
21 2004 25–25 50.0% #31 1,710 0 1 — — — — — — —
22 2005 38–25 60.3% #19 1,863 0 1 — — — — — — —
23 2006 35–25 58.3% #17 1,837 0 1 — — — — — — —
24 2007 52–26 66.7% #9 1,932 0 3 — — — — — — —
25 2008 22–20 52.4% #21 1,757 0 3 — — — — — — —
26 2009 37–24 60.7% #24 1,809 0 3 — — — — — — —
27 2010 32–24 57.1% #30 1,781 0 3 — — — — — — —
28 2011 41–25 62.1% #24 1,791 0 4 — — — — — — —
29 2012 24–23 51.1% #32 1,692 0 5 — — — — — — —
30 2013 23–24 48.9% #33 1,683 0 6 — — — — — — —
31 2014 16–24 40.0% #62 1,571 0 6 — — — — — — —
32 2015 15–19 44.1% #83 1,572 0 7 — — — — — — —
33 2016 1–9 10.0% #228 1,514 0 7 — — — — — — —
34 2017 1–1 50.0% #317 1,526 0 7 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Daniela Hantuchova Bianka Lamade
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1999 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2000 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 2000 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — —
18 2001 4 8 12 33.3% 5 4 9 55.6% 5 2 7 71.4% 5 2 7 71.4% 2001 7 3 10 70.0% 6 8 14 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
19 2002 28 13 41 68.3% 10 6 16 62.5% 6 2 8 75.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2002 2 5 7 28.6% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
20 2003 12 12 24 50.0% 8 6 14 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2003 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2004 13 14 27 48.1% 2 5 7 28.6% 7 3 10 70.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2005 31 17 48 64.6% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2006 26 18 44 59.1% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2007 36 18 54 66.7% 8 4 12 66.7% 8 3 11 72.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2008 20 17 37 54.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2009 23 15 38 60.5% 8 6 14 57.1% 5 2 7 71.4% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2010 24 18 42 57.1% 6 4 10 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2011 20 16 36 55.6% 12 6 18 66.7% 9 3 12 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2012 21 19 40 52.5% — — — — 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2013 15 17 32 46.9% 2 5 7 28.6% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2014 5 15 20 25.0% 8 5 13 61.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2015 11 12 23 47.8% 0 4 4 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2016 0 6 6 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2017 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 290 239 529 54.8% 79 67 146 54.1% 66 39 105 62.9% 26 20 46 56.5% — 9 9 18 50.0% 10 16 26 38.5% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Daniela Hantuchova Bianka Lamade
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1999 1494 105.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2000 1550 115.3 — — — — +15 -2 — 44.8% -0.73 2–3 (40%) 2–1 (67%) 101.1 +0.04 2000 1542 112.0 — — — — — +40 — 58.3% +0.17 1–1 — — +0.15
18 2001 1710 143.1 — — — — -61 -102 +42 55.0% +0.45 4–8 (33%) 4–6 (40%) 98.9 -1.24 2001 1628 123.2 — — — — -38 +12 — 49.1% -0.16 5–4 (56%) 4–5 (44%) 102.9 +0.29
19 2002 1920 160.1 — — — — -36 -168 -31 63.3% +1.02 13–9 (59%) 10–4 (71%) 108.1 +1.09 2002 1537 104.6 — — — — +28 +5 +27 28.2% -1.56 2–3 (40%) 1–1 — -0.54
20 2003 1752 137.7 +1.71 +1.73 1.137 52.9% +26 +6 +110 50.9% -0.12 9–5 (64%) 12–5 (71%) 106.4 +2.36 2003 1527 98.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — -0.14
21 2004 1710 131.4 +0.32 -0.58 0.910 48.4% +1 -22 +176 46.7% -0.17 11–6 (65%) 9–8 (53%) 103.9 -0.74 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2005 1863 153.2 +2.43 +2.83 1.170 53.1% +26 -199 -56 56.1% +0.53 13–6 (68%) 6–8 (43%) 103.6 -0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2006 1838 147.6 +2.67 -0.32 1.025 50.7% +7 -127 +7 54.0% +0.26 17–8 (68%) 8–4 (67%) 107.0 +0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2007 1932 154.4 +5.20 +1.87 1.165 53.3% -6 -130 +1 63.3% +0.90 15–10 (60%) 14–4 (78%) 108.1 +2.67 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2008 1757 140.8 +2.10 -0.03 1.032 50.5% +2 — — 53.2% +0.13 6–6 (50%) 5–3 (63%) 97.7 +0.80 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 2009 1809 138.5 +1.75 -0.25 1.015 50.3% -33 -39 +107 55.7% +0.39 18–9 (67%) 11–5 (69%) 106.6 +1.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2010 1782 145.6 +2.86 +0.69 1.046 51.1% -3 -1 +88 55.6% +0.57 10–10 (50%) 4–7 (36%) 95.2 -1.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2011 1791 150.0 +3.89 +1.34 1.119 52.5% -42 +70 +168 60.4% +0.95 11–10 (52%) 8–9 (47%) 99.6 -1.84 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2012 1692 138.5 +1.52 -0.83 0.958 49.3% +8 — +159 46.3% -0.01 12–6 (67%) 5–11 (31%) 98.0 -1.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2013 1684 132.7 +0.51 -1.74 0.944 48.9% -14 +86 +204 48.1% +0.01 12–6 (67%) 5–8 (38%) 100.2 +1.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2014 1571 119.0 -0.43 -1.17 0.933 48.4% -17 +164 +244 39.5% -0.75 5–4 (56%) 0–2 — +2.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2015 1573 117.2 -0.30 -2.09 0.931 48.5% -5 +70 +227 43.0% -0.67 7–4 (64%) 8–4 (67%) 106.6 -0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2016 1514 111.4 -2.93 -2.64 0.748 43.7% -12 — +237 18.2% -2.18 0–2 1–1 — -0.58 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2017 1527 110.5 -1.92 +0.79 0.967 49.2% — — — 40.0% +0.20 1–0 — — -0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1968 147.9 +2.22 +0.08 1.029 50.6% -7 -28 +111 53.5% +0.29 166–112 (60%) 112–90 (55%) 107.0 +0.52 — 1669 116.2 — — — — -11 +16 +27 41.8% -0.67 8–8 (50%) 5–7 (42%) 100.9 -0.49

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.