H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Daniela Hantuchova vs Chanda Rubin H2H: 2-0
Daniela Hantuchova holds a 2–0 lead over Chanda Rubin in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Daniela Hantuchova leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Daniela Hantuchova won the 2005 Cincinnati fourth round 6-2 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SVK
Age 43
Right-Handed
181 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 50
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 22, 2005* | Cincinnati | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Daniela Hantuchova | 6-2 7-5 | Chanda Rubin | Match data |
| May 9, 2002* | Berlin | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Daniela Hantuchova | 6-2 6-4 | Chanda Rubin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniela Hantuchova | #317 | #5 | 2,897 | 1,968 | 457 | 361 | 55.9% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 7 |
| Chanda Rubin | #1,122 | #6 | 2,554 | 2,047 | 343 | 231 | 59.8% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Daniela Hantuchova | Chanda Rubin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #526 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #84 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #197 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #84 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2000 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #108 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #70 | 1,653 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2001 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #38 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #23 | 1,804 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2002 | 48–24 | 66.7% | #8 | 1,919 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 38–19 | 66.7% | #15 | 1,945 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2003 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #19 | 1,753 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 20–9 | 69.0% | #17 | 1,989 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2004 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #31 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #32 | 1,814 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2005 | 38–25 | 60.3% | #19 | 1,877 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #35 | 1,800 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2006 | 35–25 | 58.3% | #17 | 1,860 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 33–20 | 62.3% | #22 | 1,843 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2007 | 52–26 | 66.7% | #9 | 1,930 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #13 | 1,910 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2008 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #21 | 1,756 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #52 | 1,806 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2009 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #24 | 1,807 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 29–11 | 72.5% | #13 | 1,958 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 2010 | 32–24 | 57.1% | #30 | 1,780 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 43–20 | 68.3% | #9 | 1,917 | 0 | 7 |
| 28 | 2011 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #24 | 1,790 | 0 | 4 | 2004 | 16–10 | 61.5% | #52 | 1,860 | 0 | 7 |
| 29 | 2012 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #32 | 1,686 | 0 | 5 | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #545 | 1,823 | 0 | 7 |
| 30 | 2013 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #33 | 1,683 | 0 | 6 | 2006 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #486 | 1,719 | 0 | 7 |
| 31 | 2014 | 16–24 | 40.0% | #62 | 1,577 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2015 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #83 | 1,574 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2016 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #228 | 1,514 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2017 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #317 | 1,524 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |