H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Daniela Hantuchova vs Conchita Martínez H2H: 2-3

Conchita Martínez holds a 3–2 lead over Daniela Hantuchova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Conchita Martínez leads 2–0 on clay, while Daniela Hantuchova leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Daniela Hantuchova won the 2005 Linz fourth round 2-6 6-0 3-1 RET.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Daniela Hantuchova
SVK Age 43 Right-Handed 181 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2 – 3
5 main draw meetings
Conchita Martínez
ESP Age 54 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 28, 2005* Linz WTA 500 R16 Hard Daniela Hantuchova #20 2-6 6-0 3-1 (ret.) Conchita Martínez #38 Match data
Feb 26, 2005* Doha WTA 500 QF Hard Daniela Hantuchova #28 6-4 6-1 Conchita Martínez #37 Match data
Jun 21, 2003* Eastbourne WTA 500 QF Grass Conchita Martínez #19 6-2 6-3 Daniela Hantuchova #9 Match data
May 16, 2003* Rome WTA 1000 R16 Clay Conchita Martínez #27 6-3 6-3 Daniela Hantuchova #9 Match data
May 31, 2001* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Conchita Martínez #12 7-6(4) 6-4 Daniela Hantuchova #76 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Daniela Hantuchova #317 #5 2,897 1,968 457 361 55.9% 0 2 0 1 4 7
Conchita Martínez #1,498 #2 3,180 2,263 669 275 70.9% 1 9 0 4 19 33

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Daniela Hantuchova Conchita Martínez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1999 0–1 0.0% #197 1,494 0 0 1988 14–6 70.0% #41 1,730 0 1
17 2000 6–7 46.2% #108 1,551 0 0 1989 35–9 79.5% #7 1,933 0 4
18 2001 19–16 54.3% #38 1,710 0 0 1990 38–10 79.2% #11 2,063 0 7
19 2002 48–24 66.7% #8 1,919 0 1 1991 36–12 75.0% #9 2,076 0 10
20 2003 26–23 53.1% #19 1,753 0 1 1992 44–16 73.3% #8 2,054 0 11
21 2004 24–24 50.0% #31 1,714 0 1 1993 66–13 83.5% #4 2,158 0 16
22 2005 38–25 60.3% #19 1,877 0 1 1994 51–14 78.5% #3 2,065 1 20
23 2006 35–25 58.3% #17 1,860 0 1 1995 57–10 85.1% #2 2,182 1 26
24 2007 52–26 66.7% #9 1,930 0 3 1996 44–16 73.3% #4 2,074 1 28
25 2008 21–19 52.5% #21 1,756 0 3 1997 37–19 66.1% #12 2,011 1 28
26 2009 37–24 60.7% #24 1,807 0 3 1998 38–16 70.4% #8 1,968 1 30
27 2010 32–24 57.1% #30 1,780 0 3 1999 38–22 63.3% #15 1,898 1 31
28 2011 41–25 62.1% #24 1,790 0 4 2000 48–19 71.6% #5 1,951 1 32
29 2012 22–22 50.0% #32 1,686 0 5 2001 19–13 59.4% #35 1,852 1 32
30 2013 23–24 48.9% #33 1,683 0 6 2002 26–24 52.0% #34 1,756 1 32
31 2014 16–24 40.0% #62 1,577 0 6 2003 29–21 58.0% #18 1,756 1 32
32 2015 15–19 44.1% #83 1,574 0 7 2004 20–16 55.6% #42 1,772 1 32
33 2016 1–8 11.1% #228 1,514 0 7 2005 29–19 60.4% #31 1,812 1 33
34 2017 1–1 50.0% #317 1,524 0 7 — — — — — — —