H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Daniela Hantuchova vs Francesca Schiavone H2H: 4-4

Daniela Hantuchova and Francesca Schiavone are tied 4–4 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Daniela Hantuchova leads 3–1 on hard courts, while Francesca Schiavone leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Daniela Hantuchova won the 2013 Birmingham quarterfinal 6-7(8) 6-4 7-6(3).

SVK Age 43 Right-Handed 181 cm / 5'11"
H2H
4 4
8 main draw meetings
ITA Age 46 Right-Handed 166 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 15, 2013* Birmingham WTA 250 QF Grass Daniela Hantuchova #60 6-7(8) 6-4 7-6(3) Francesca Schiavone #45 Match data
Jan 13, 2012* Sydney WTA 500 R16 Hard Daniela Hantuchova #21 7-5 6-1 Francesca Schiavone #11 Match data
May 13, 2011* Rome WTA 1000 R16 Clay Francesca Schiavone #5 3-6 6-2 7-5 Daniela Hantuchova #33 Match data
May 5, 2010* Rome WTA 1000 R64 Clay Francesca Schiavone #17 3-6 6-2 6-3 Daniela Hantuchova #24 Match data
Oct 9, 2008* Moscow WTA 1000 R32 Hard Daniela Hantuchova #13 6-3 6-2 Francesca Schiavone #23 Match data
Sep 18, 2008* Tokyo WTA 1000 R32 Hard Francesca Schiavone #28 6-1 7-5 Daniela Hantuchova #12 Match data
Mar 8, 2007* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R32 Hard Daniela Hantuchova #18 6-2 7-6(3) Francesca Schiavone #21 Match data
Feb 9, 2002* Paris WTA 500 R16 Carpet Francesca Schiavone #29 6-2 7-5 Daniela Hantuchova #27 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Daniela Hantuchova #317 #5 2,897 1,968 457 361 55.9% 0 2 0 1 4 7
Francesca Schiavone #486 #4 5,246 1,984 439 367 54.5% 1 0 0 3 4 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Daniela Hantuchova Francesca Schiavone
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1999 0–1 0.0% #197 1,494 0 0
17 2000 6–7 46.2% #108 1,551 0 0
18 2001 19–16 54.3% #38 1,710 0 0
19 2002 48–24 66.7% #8 1,919 0 1 1999 0–1 0.0% #200 1,494 0 0
20 2003 26–23 53.1% #19 1,753 0 1 2000 7–4 63.6% #80 1,577 0 0
21 2004 24–24 50.0% #31 1,714 0 1 2001 26–22 54.2% #31 1,657 0 0
22 2005 38–25 60.3% #19 1,877 0 1 2002 20–22 47.6% #41 1,691 0 0
23 2006 35–25 58.3% #17 1,860 0 1 2003 32–23 58.2% #20 1,803 0 0
24 2007 52–26 66.7% #9 1,930 0 3 2004 32–22 59.3% #19 1,822 0 0
25 2008 21–19 52.5% #21 1,756 0 3 2005 39–21 65.0% #13 1,952 0 0
26 2009 37–24 60.7% #24 1,807 0 3 2006 35–23 60.3% #15 1,802 0 0
27 2010 32–24 57.1% #30 1,780 0 3 2007 27–22 55.1% #24 1,835 0 1
28 2011 41–25 62.1% #24 1,790 0 4 2008 22–21 51.2% #30 1,757 0 1
29 2012 22–22 50.0% #32 1,686 0 5 2009 35–25 58.3% #17 1,837 0 2
30 2013 23–24 48.9% #33 1,683 0 6 2010 38–21 64.4% #7 1,898 1 4
31 2014 16–24 40.0% #62 1,577 0 6 2011 34–21 61.8% #11 1,819 1 4
32 2015 15–19 44.1% #83 1,574 0 7 2012 20–21 48.8% #35 1,687 1 5
33 2016 1–8 11.1% #228 1,514 0 7 2013 25–24 51.0% #39 1,722 1 6
34 2017 1–1 50.0% #317 1,524 0 7 2014 14–25 35.9% #78 1,619 1 6
35 2015 9–17 34.6% #114 1,562 1 6
36 2016 13–13 50.0% #103 1,594 1 7
37 2017 11–14 44.0% #91 1,619 1 8
38 2018 0–5 0.0% #486 1,501 1 8