H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Daniela Hantuchova vs Jarmila Wolfe H2H: 0-1

Jarmila Wolfe holds a 1–0 lead over Daniela Hantuchova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jarmila Wolfe leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jarmila Wolfe won the 2014 Tokyo third round 6-2 5-7 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Daniela Hantuchova
SVK Age 43 Right-Handed 181 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Jarmila Wolfe
AUS Age 39 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 18, 2014* Tokyo WTA 500 R32 Hard Jarmila Wolfe #91 6-2 5-7 7-5 Daniela Hantuchova #55 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Daniela Hantuchova #317 #5 2,897 1,968 457 361 55.9% 0 2 0 1 4 7
Jarmila Wolfe #623 #25 2,060 1,799 104 137 43.2% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Daniela Hantuchova Jarmila Wolfe
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1999 0–1 0.0% #197 1,494 0 0 2003 2–1 66.7% #195 1,532 0 0
17 2000 6–7 46.2% #108 1,551 0 0 2004 0–1 0.0% #222 1,515 0 0
18 2001 19–16 54.3% #38 1,710 0 0 2005 2–2 50.0% #147 1,538 0 0
19 2002 48–24 66.7% #8 1,919 0 1 2006 8–12 40.0% #69 1,533 0 0
20 2003 26–23 53.1% #19 1,753 0 1 2007 6–14 30.0% #142 1,475 0 0
21 2004 24–24 50.0% #31 1,714 0 1 2008 3–6 33.3% #99 1,505 0 0
22 2005 38–25 60.3% #19 1,877 0 1 2009 9–14 39.1% #110 1,562 0 0
23 2006 35–25 58.3% #17 1,860 0 1 2010 19–12 61.3% #42 1,687 0 1
24 2007 52–26 66.7% #9 1,930 0 3 2011 28–23 54.9% #33 1,696 0 2
25 2008 21–19 52.5% #21 1,756 0 3 2012 7–19 26.9% #183 1,509 0 2
26 2009 37–24 60.7% #24 1,807 0 3 2013 3–3 50.0% #238 1,535 0 2
27 2010 32–24 57.1% #30 1,780 0 3 2014 6–10 37.5% #71 1,555 0 2
28 2011 41–25 62.1% #24 1,790 0 4 2015 11–18 37.9% #105 1,537 0 2
29 2012 22–22 50.0% #32 1,686 0 5 2016 0–2 0.0% #624 1,480 0 2
30 2013 23–24 48.9% #33 1,683 0 6 — — — — — — —
31 2014 16–24 40.0% #62 1,577 0 6 — — — — — — —
32 2015 15–19 44.1% #83 1,574 0 7 — — — — — — —
33 2016 1–8 11.1% #228 1,514 0 7 — — — — — — —
34 2017 1–1 50.0% #317 1,524 0 7 — — — — — — —