H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Daniela Hantuchova vs Jennifer Capriati H2H: 0-2
Jennifer Capriati holds a 2–0 lead over Daniela Hantuchova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jennifer Capriati leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jennifer Capriati won the 2001 Toronto third round 5-7 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SVK
Age 43
Right-Handed
181 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 50
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 13, 2001 | Toronto | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Jennifer Capriati | 5-7 7-5 6-2 | Daniela Hantuchova | Match data |
| Feb 24, 2001* | Oklahoma City | WTA 250 | SF | Carpet | Jennifer Capriati | 6-4 3-6 6-2 | Daniela Hantuchova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniela Hantuchova | #317 | #5 | 2,897 | 1,968 | 457 | 361 | 55.9% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 7 |
| Jennifer Capriati | #54 | #1 | 5,123 | 2,216 | 405 | 170 | 70.4% | 3 | 2 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 13 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Daniela Hantuchova | Jennifer Capriati | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 37–11 | 77.1% | #8 | 1,961 | 0 | 1 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 39–11 | 78.0% | #6 | 2,194 | 0 | 3 |
| 16 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #197 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 29–11 | 72.5% | #7 | 2,159 | 0 | 4 |
| 17 | 2000 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #108 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 30–11 | 73.2% | #9 | 2,142 | 0 | 5 |
| 18 | 2001 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #38 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #42 | 2,119 | 0 | 5 |
| 19 | 2002 | 48–24 | 66.7% | #8 | 1,919 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2003 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #19 | 1,753 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 16–9 | 64.0% | #36 | 2,068 | 0 | 5 |
| 21 | 2004 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #31 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #65 | 1,878 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | 2005 | 38–25 | 60.3% | #19 | 1,877 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #99 | 1,748 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 2006 | 35–25 | 58.3% | #17 | 1,860 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 26–13 | 66.7% | #23 | 1,907 | 0 | 7 |
| 24 | 2007 | 52–26 | 66.7% | #9 | 1,930 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 35–19 | 64.8% | #14 | 1,906 | 0 | 8 |
| 25 | 2008 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #21 | 1,756 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 56–14 | 80.0% | #2 | 2,094 | 2 | 11 |
| 26 | 2009 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #24 | 1,807 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 48–16 | 75.0% | #3 | 2,019 | 3 | 12 |
| 27 | 2010 | 32–24 | 57.1% | #30 | 1,780 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 42–18 | 70.0% | #6 | 2,022 | 3 | 13 |
| 28 | 2011 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #24 | 1,790 | 0 | 4 | 2004 | 29–12 | 70.7% | #10 | 2,019 | 3 | 13 |
| 29 | 2012 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #32 | 1,686 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2013 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #33 | 1,683 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2014 | 16–24 | 40.0% | #62 | 1,577 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2015 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #83 | 1,574 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2016 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #228 | 1,514 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2017 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #317 | 1,524 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |