H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Daniela Hantuchova vs Jill Craybas H2H: 6-0

Daniela Hantuchova holds a 6–0 lead over Jill Craybas in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Daniela Hantuchova leads 5–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Daniela Hantuchova won the 2010 Luxembourg third round 7-5 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Daniela Hantuchova
SVK Age 43 Right-Handed 181 cm / 5'11"
H2H
6 – 0
6 main draw meetings
Jill Craybas
USA Age 52 Right-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 21, 2010* Luxembourg WTA 250 R32 Hard Daniela Hantuchova #30 7-5 6-1 Jill Craybas #104 Match data
Sep 30, 2009* Tokyo WTA 1000 R64 Hard Daniela Hantuchova #22 6-3 6-3 Jill Craybas #85 Match data
Aug 9, 2007* Los Angeles WTA 500 R32 Hard Daniela Hantuchova #10 6-3 7-6(5) Jill Craybas #74 Match data
Jan 6, 2006* Auckland WTA 250 R16 Hard Daniela Hantuchova #19 6-3 6-1 Jill Craybas #48 Match data
Aug 11, 2003 Toronto WTA 1000 R32 Hard Daniela Hantuchova #8 6-1 6-2 Jill Craybas #76 Match data
Apr 11, 2003* Charleston WTA 1000 R16 Clay Daniela Hantuchova #9 7-6(10) 6-3 Jill Craybas #57 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Daniela Hantuchova #317 #5 2,897 1,968 457 361 55.9% 0 2 0 1 4 7
Jill Craybas #336 #39 974 1,695 161 256 38.6% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Daniela Hantuchova Jill Craybas
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1999 0–1 0.0% #197 1,494 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2000 6–7 46.2% #108 1,551 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2001 19–16 54.3% #38 1,710 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2002 48–24 66.7% #8 1,919 0 1 — — — — — — —
20 2003 26–23 53.1% #19 1,753 0 1 — — — — — — —
21 2004 24–24 50.0% #31 1,714 0 1 1996 0–1 0.0% — 1,488 0 0
22 2005 38–25 60.3% #19 1,877 0 1 — — — — — — —
23 2006 35–25 58.3% #17 1,860 0 1 1998 0–1 0.0% #154 1,473 0 0
24 2007 52–26 66.7% #9 1,930 0 3 1999 0–4 0.0% #175 1,445 0 0
25 2008 21–19 52.5% #21 1,756 0 3 2000 1–2 33.3% #145 1,449 0 0
26 2009 37–24 60.7% #24 1,807 0 3 2001 8–17 32.0% #98 1,479 0 0
27 2010 32–24 57.1% #30 1,780 0 3 2002 19–15 55.9% #57 1,652 0 1
28 2011 41–25 62.1% #24 1,790 0 4 2003 16–22 42.1% #99 1,568 0 1
29 2012 22–22 50.0% #32 1,686 0 5 2004 12–21 36.4% #59 1,499 0 1
30 2013 23–24 48.9% #33 1,683 0 6 2005 19–23 45.2% #48 1,614 0 1
31 2014 16–24 40.0% #62 1,577 0 6 2006 18–25 41.9% #70 1,569 0 1
32 2015 15–19 44.1% #83 1,574 0 7 2007 12–27 30.8% #79 1,472 0 1
33 2016 1–8 11.1% #228 1,514 0 7 2008 22–25 46.8% #64 1,575 0 1
34 2017 1–1 50.0% #317 1,524 0 7 2009 12–21 36.4% #76 1,592 0 1
35 — — — — — — — 2010 12–23 34.3% #98 1,546 0 1
36 — — — — — — — 2011 6–20 23.1% #150 1,442 0 1
37 — — — — — — — 2012 3–7 30.0% #189 1,449 0 1
38 — — — — — — — 2013 1–2 33.3% #336 1,451 0 1