H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Daniela Hantuchova vs Lisa Raymond H2H: 3-1
Daniela Hantuchova holds a 3–1 lead over Lisa Raymond in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Daniela Hantuchova leads 3–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Daniela Hantuchova won the 2006 Los Angeles third round 7-6(2) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SVK
Age 43
Right-Handed
181 cm / 5'11"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
USA
Age 52
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 10, 2006* | Los Angeles | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Daniela Hantuchova | 7-6(2) 6-2 | Lisa Raymond | Match data |
| Aug 28, 2004* | New Haven | WTA 500 | QF | Hard | Lisa Raymond | 6-4 6-3 | Daniela Hantuchova | Match data |
| Oct 9, 2003* | Filderstadt | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Daniela Hantuchova | 6-3 6-4 | Lisa Raymond | Match data |
| Mar 11, 2002* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | QF | Hard | Daniela Hantuchova | 6-4 6-2 | Lisa Raymond | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniela Hantuchova | #317 | #5 | 2,897 | 1,968 | 457 | 361 | 55.9% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 7 |
| Lisa Raymond | #884 | #15 | 1,695 | 1,945 | 325 | 272 | 54.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Daniela Hantuchova | Lisa Raymond | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #449 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #197 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #336 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2000 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #108 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #257 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2001 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #38 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #75 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2002 | 48–24 | 66.7% | #8 | 1,919 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #55 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2003 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #19 | 1,753 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #44 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2004 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #31 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #20 | 1,813 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2005 | 38–25 | 60.3% | #19 | 1,877 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #27 | 1,859 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2006 | 35–25 | 58.3% | #17 | 1,860 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #17 | 1,910 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2007 | 52–26 | 66.7% | #9 | 1,930 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #27 | 1,837 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2008 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #21 | 1,756 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #28 | 1,784 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2009 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #24 | 1,807 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #30 | 1,795 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2010 | 32–24 | 57.1% | #30 | 1,780 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #22 | 1,833 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2011 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #24 | 1,790 | 0 | 4 | 2002 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #29 | 1,755 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2012 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #32 | 1,686 | 0 | 5 | 2003 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #27 | 1,767 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2013 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #33 | 1,683 | 0 | 6 | 2004 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #30 | 1,746 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 2014 | 16–24 | 40.0% | #62 | 1,577 | 0 | 6 | 2005 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #74 | 1,631 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | 2015 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #83 | 1,574 | 0 | 7 | 2006 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #128 | 1,580 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | 2016 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #228 | 1,514 | 0 | 7 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #884 | 1,563 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | 2017 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #317 | 1,524 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |