H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Daniela Hantuchova vs Lourdes Domínguez Lino H2H: 6-0

Daniela Hantuchova holds a 6–0 lead over Lourdes Domínguez Lino in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Daniela Hantuchova leads 4–0 on hard courts and 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Daniela Hantuchova won the 2014 Marrakech fourth round 7-5 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Daniela Hantuchova
SVK Age 43 Right-Handed 181 cm / 5'11"
H2H
6 – 0
6 main draw meetings
Lourdes Domínguez Lino
ESP Age 45 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 25, 2014* Marrakech WTA 250 R16 Clay Daniela Hantuchova #30 7-5 6-2 Lourdes Domínguez Lino #75 Match data
Jan 3, 2013* Brisbane WTA 500 R32 Hard Daniela Hantuchova #32 7-5 6-2 Lourdes Domínguez Lino #48 Match data
Oct 20, 2012* Luxembourg WTA 250 QF Hard Daniela Hantuchova #38 7-5 6-0 Lourdes Domínguez Lino #54 Match data
Aug 17, 2011* Cincinnati WTA 1000 R64 Hard Daniela Hantuchova #23 6-3 4-1 (ret.) Lourdes Domínguez Lino #47 Match data
Mar 4, 2010* Monterrey WTA 500 R32 Hard Daniela Hantuchova #24 6-3 7-6(6) Lourdes Domínguez Lino #146 Match data
May 30, 2006* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Daniela Hantuchova #18 6-1 6-4 Lourdes Domínguez Lino #44 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Daniela Hantuchova #317 #5 2,897 1,968 457 361 55.9% 0 2 0 1 4 7
Lourdes Domínguez Lino #1,129 #40 1,305 1,674 125 157 44.3% 0 0 0 1 1 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Daniela Hantuchova Lourdes Domínguez Lino
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1999 0–1 0.0% #197 1,494 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2000 6–7 46.2% #108 1,551 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2001 19–16 54.3% #38 1,710 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2002 48–24 66.7% #8 1,919 0 1 2000 0–1 0.0% #141 1,489 0 0
20 2003 26–23 53.1% #19 1,753 0 1 2001 0–1 0.0% #378 1,479 0 0
21 2004 24–24 50.0% #31 1,714 0 1 2002 4–3 57.1% #390 1,518 0 0
22 2005 38–25 60.3% #19 1,877 0 1 2003 0–1 0.0% #319 1,503 0 0
23 2006 35–25 58.3% #17 1,860 0 1 2004 1–1 50.0% #208 1,508 0 0
24 2007 52–26 66.7% #9 1,930 0 3 2005 6–4 60.0% #72 1,553 0 0
25 2008 21–19 52.5% #21 1,756 0 3 2006 21–19 52.5% #52 1,622 0 1
26 2009 37–24 60.7% #24 1,807 0 3 2007 16–21 43.2% #71 1,558 0 1
27 2010 32–24 57.1% #30 1,780 0 3 2008 6–11 35.3% #91 1,521 0 1
28 2011 41–25 62.1% #24 1,790 0 4 2009 6–13 31.6% #134 1,484 0 1
29 2012 22–22 50.0% #32 1,686 0 5 2010 2–4 33.3% #85 1,493 0 1
30 2013 23–24 48.9% #33 1,683 0 6 2011 16–16 50.0% #79 1,583 0 2
31 2014 16–24 40.0% #62 1,577 0 6 2012 16–16 50.0% #48 1,653 0 2
32 2015 15–19 44.1% #83 1,574 0 7 2013 17–22 43.6% #69 1,620 0 2
33 2016 1–8 11.1% #228 1,514 0 7 2014 7–11 38.9% #110 1,570 0 2
34 2017 1–1 50.0% #317 1,524 0 7 2015 4–5 44.4% #100 1,552 0 2
35 — — — — — — — 2016 3–8 27.3% #220 1,517 0 2