H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Daniela Hantuchova vs Meghann Shaughnessy H2H: 5-1

Daniela Hantuchova holds a 5–1 lead over Meghann Shaughnessy in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Daniela Hantuchova leads 4–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Daniela Hantuchova won the 2009 US Open first round 6-2 4-6 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Daniela Hantuchova
SVK Age 43 Right-Handed 181 cm / 5'11"
H2H
5 – 1
6 main-draw meetings
Meghann Shaughnessy
USA Age 47 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Daniela Hantuchova #24 6-2 4-6 6-1 Meghann Shaughnessy #902 Match data Sep 2, 2009* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Daniela Hantuchova #10 3-6 6-3 5-3 (ret.) Meghann Shaughnessy #36 Match data Jun 22, 2007* R16 Libéma Open Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Grass
Daniela Hantuchova #20 6-4 6-0 Meghann Shaughnessy #53 Match data Oct 6, 2005* R32 Porsche Tennis Grand Prix Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Daniela Hantuchova #24 6-4 3-6 6-1 Meghann Shaughnessy #69 Match data Jul 29, 2005* R16 Stanford Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Meghann Shaughnessy #13 6-4 6-1 Daniela Hantuchova #37 Match data Jan 10, 2002* R16 Sydney International Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Daniela Hantuchova #53 6-3 6-4 Meghann Shaughnessy #12 Match data Oct 18, 2001* R32 Zurich Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Daniela Hantuchova #317 #5 2,897 1,968 461 365 55.8% 0 2 0 1 4 7
Meghann Shaughnessy #1,104 #11 1,949 1,903 233 233 50.0% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Daniela Hantuchova Meghann Shaughnessy
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1999 0–1 0.0% #197 1,494 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2000 6–7 46.2% #108 1,550 0 0 1996 3–4 42.9% #165 1,511 0 0
18 2001 19–16 54.3% #38 1,710 0 0 1997 0–1 0.0% #198 1,499 0 0
19 2002 48–24 66.7% #8 1,919 0 1 1998 8–9 47.1% #69 1,544 0 0
20 2003 26–23 53.1% #19 1,751 0 1 1999 10–22 31.2% #99 1,438 0 0
21 2004 25–25 50.0% #31 1,710 0 1 2000 23–20 53.5% #38 1,651 0 1
22 2005 38–25 60.3% #19 1,863 0 1 2001 45–25 64.3% #12 1,832 0 2
23 2006 35–25 58.3% #17 1,837 0 1 2002 29–27 51.8% #30 1,738 0 2
24 2007 52–26 66.7% #9 1,932 0 3 2003 32–23 58.2% #17 1,729 0 3
25 2008 22–20 52.4% #21 1,757 0 3 2004 20–22 47.6% #40 1,662 0 3
26 2009 37–24 60.7% #24 1,809 0 3 2005 17–25 40.5% #66 1,566 0 3
27 2010 32–24 57.1% #30 1,781 0 3 2006 27–20 57.4% #37 1,709 0 5
28 2011 41–25 62.1% #24 1,791 0 4 2007 18–22 45.0% #52 1,666 0 6
29 2012 24–23 51.1% #32 1,692 0 5 2008 0–5 0.0% #836 1,579 0 6
30 2013 23–24 48.9% #33 1,683 0 6 2009 1–8 11.1% #590 1,533 0 6
31 2014 16–24 40.0% #62 1,571 0 6 — — — — — — —
32 2015 15–19 44.1% #83 1,572 0 7 — — — — — — —
33 2016 1–9 10.0% #228 1,514 0 7 — — — — — — —
34 2017 1–1 50.0% #317 1,526 0 7 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Daniela Hantuchova Meghann Shaughnessy
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1999 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2000 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 1996 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
18 2001 4 8 12 33.3% 5 4 9 55.6% 5 2 7 71.4% 5 2 7 71.4% 1997 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2002 28 13 41 68.3% 10 6 16 62.5% 6 2 8 75.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1998 4 5 9 44.4% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 2003 12 12 24 50.0% 8 6 14 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1999 2 7 9 22.2% 5 11 16 31.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 2004 13 14 27 48.1% 2 5 7 28.6% 7 3 10 70.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2000 15 10 25 60.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 2005 31 17 48 64.6% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2001 18 14 32 56.3% 15 7 22 68.2% 5 2 7 71.4% 7 2 9 77.8%
23 2006 26 18 44 59.1% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2002 16 15 31 51.6% 6 7 13 46.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
24 2007 36 18 54 66.7% 8 4 12 66.7% 8 3 11 72.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2003 26 13 39 66.7% 6 5 11 54.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
25 2008 20 17 37 54.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2004 14 16 30 46.7% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
26 2009 23 15 38 60.5% 8 6 14 57.1% 5 2 7 71.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 2005 9 15 24 37.5% 4 7 11 36.4% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
27 2010 24 18 42 57.1% 6 4 10 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2006 14 13 27 51.9% 12 6 18 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
28 2011 20 16 36 55.6% 12 6 18 66.7% 9 3 12 75.0% — — — — 2007 7 13 20 35.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 2012 21 19 40 52.5% — — — — 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 2008 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 2013 15 17 32 46.9% 2 5 7 28.6% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2009 1 8 9 11.1% — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2014 5 15 20 25.0% 8 5 13 61.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2015 11 12 23 47.8% 0 4 4 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2016 0 6 6 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2017 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 290 239 529 54.8% 79 67 146 54.1% 66 39 105 62.9% 26 20 46 56.5% — 126 133 259 48.6% 74 67 141 52.5% 20 19 39 51.3% 13 14 27 48.1%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 512/705 of Daniela Hantuchova's and 94/240 of Meghann Shaughnessy's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Daniela Hantuchova Meghann Shaughnessy
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 2003 7/49 2.1 2.6 61.5% 62.8% 53.0% 46.0% 45.9% 59.1% 46.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2004 8/50 2.6 3.0 59.5% 62.1% 44.2% 43.0% 64.2% 55.1% 40.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2005 15/63 4.0 3.2 58.2% 69.2% 46.3% 50.6% 45.0% 59.1% 47.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2006 42/60 3.4 2.7 63.8% 66.1% 44.7% 56.1% 46.8% 58.5% 42.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2007 74/78 3.5 2.6 65.4% 68.4% 47.9% 58.5% 49.2% 61.2% 45.2% 2003 8/55 5.0 4.4 51.4% 71.2% 47.2% 53.9% 49.8% 59.4% 40.4%
25 2008 36/42 2.1 2.2 64.4% 64.5% 45.8% 57.0% 50.2% 57.8% 43.5% 2004 6/42 6.5 6.7 50.5% 72.4% 42.1% 59.3% 38.6% 57.5% 39.3%
26 2009 57/61 2.4 2.4 63.3% 63.3% 46.3% 49.7% 49.1% 57.1% 43.5% 2005 11/42 9.1 4.0 54.9% 77.0% 49.1% 57.4% 45.9% 64.4% 39.2%
27 2010 49/56 2.7 2.6 64.9% 64.3% 46.9% 52.9% 49.4% 58.1% 43.8% 2006 21/47 4.4 5.3 55.4% 68.5% 45.4% 54.3% 38.1% 57.9% 39.9%
28 2011 64/66 3.2 2.6 62.8% 65.9% 49.7% 59.9% 47.6% 59.8% 45.0% 2007 34/40 4.5 3.9 54.5% 70.0% 45.4% 56.8% 37.8% 58.6% 39.4%
29 2012 38/47 2.4 3.7 62.2% 63.6% 45.7% 53.2% 51.4% 56.9% 41.3% 2008 5/5 3.0 3.0 54.3% 56.9% 45.0% 58.1% 50.8% 51.2% 37.7%
30 2013 42/47 2.6 3.4 60.9% 63.1% 43.8% 50.7% 46.6% 55.7% 41.8% 2009 9/9 5.1 2.6 46.3% 64.4% 45.7% 49.6% 31.2% 54.0% 33.6%
31 2014 37/40 2.3 3.8 62.5% 61.8% 44.7% 51.5% 43.1% 55.5% 41.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2015 32/34 2.1 3.9 66.6% 62.2% 47.7% 44.5% 46.3% 57.3% 39.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2016 9/10 2.4 3.4 60.6% 53.1% 39.7% 35.1% 52.9% 48.3% 38.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2017 2/2 3.0 5.5 65.7% 66.4% 37.9% 50.0% 39.2% 56.7% 41.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 512/826 2.8 2.9 63.4% 64.6% 46.5% 53.3% 48.3% 58.0% 43.2% — 94/466 5.2 4.2 53.4% 69.5% 45.8% 55.6% 39.9% 58.3% 38.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Daniela Hantuchova Meghann Shaughnessy
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1999 1494 105.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2000 1550 115.3 — — — — +15 -2 — 44.8% -0.73 2–3 (40%) 2–1 (67%) 101.1 +0.04 1996 1512 107.9 — — — — +9 +65 — 47.1% 0.00 1–2 (33%) — — +0.72
18 2001 1710 143.1 — — — — -61 -102 +42 55.0% +0.45 4–8 (33%) 4–6 (40%) 98.9 -1.24 1997 1499 96.7 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 — — +0.03
19 2002 1920 160.1 — — — — -36 -168 -31 63.3% +1.02 13–9 (59%) 10–4 (71%) 108.1 +1.09 1998 1544 115.4 — — — — -48 +81 — 46.2% -0.03 3–2 (60%) 0–2 — +0.65
20 2003 1752 137.7 +1.71 +1.73 1.137 52.9% +26 +6 +110 50.9% -0.12 9–5 (64%) 12–5 (71%) 106.4 +2.36 1999 1439 99.7 — — — — +16 +55 +130 36.5% -0.77 3–7 (30%) 3–5 (38%) 93.7 +2.27
21 2004 1710 131.4 +0.32 -0.58 0.910 48.4% +1 -22 +176 46.7% -0.17 11–6 (65%) 9–8 (53%) 103.9 -0.74 2000 1652 133.2 — — — — -10 -80 -108 54.2% +0.11 4–6 (40%) 7–6 (54%) 102.1 +0.56
22 2005 1863 153.2 +2.43 +2.83 1.170 53.1% +26 -199 -56 56.1% +0.53 13–6 (68%) 6–8 (43%) 103.6 -0.05 2001 1832 151.0 — — — — -45 -52 -141 59.9% +0.71 15–6 (71%) 15–11 (58%) 110.5 +1.29
23 2006 1838 147.6 +2.67 -0.32 1.025 50.7% +7 -127 +7 54.0% +0.26 17–8 (68%) 8–4 (67%) 107.0 +0.07 2002 1738 139.5 — — — — +19 -30 -36 51.6% +0.17 9–9 (50%) 5–6 (45%) 94.1 +0.83
24 2007 1932 154.4 +5.20 +1.87 1.165 53.3% -6 -130 +1 63.3% +0.90 15–10 (60%) 14–4 (78%) 108.1 +2.67 2003 1730 144.7 +2.14 -0.89 0.995 50.1% +45 -9 — 57.6% +0.54 9–8 (53%) 7–10 (41%) 96.1 +1.17
25 2008 1757 140.8 +2.10 -0.03 1.032 50.5% +2 — — 53.2% +0.13 6–6 (50%) 5–3 (63%) 97.7 +0.80 2004 1662 135.5 +1.00 -1.59 0.925 48.6% +19 +57 -22 50.0% +0.18 5–7 (42%) 5–8 (38%) 96.1 +1.24
26 2009 1809 138.5 +1.75 -0.25 1.015 50.3% -33 -39 +107 55.7% +0.39 18–9 (67%) 11–5 (69%) 106.6 +1.00 2005 1566 122.3 +4.57 -2.35 1.103 51.7% +20 +69 +81 44.8% -0.34 4–9 (31%) 7–6 (54%) 94.8 +0.33
27 2010 1782 145.6 +2.86 +0.69 1.046 51.1% -3 -1 +88 55.6% +0.57 10–10 (50%) 4–7 (36%) 95.2 -1.22 2006 1709 130.5 +1.38 -2.93 0.947 48.9% -49 +14 — 55.0% +0.25 9–6 (60%) 4–1 (80%) 107.6 -1.20
28 2011 1791 150.0 +3.89 +1.34 1.119 52.5% -42 +70 +168 60.4% +0.95 11–10 (52%) 8–9 (47%) 99.6 -1.84 2007 1666 128.5 +1.99 -3.46 0.952 49.3% -76 +156 -17 47.7% -0.09 4–6 (40%) 3–6 (33%) 96.4 +0.26
29 2012 1692 138.5 +1.52 -0.83 0.958 49.3% +8 — +159 46.3% -0.01 12–6 (67%) 5–11 (31%) 98.0 -1.10 2008 1580 93.2 -2.35 -2.24 0.773 45.3% — +131 — 14.3% -2.86 0–1 — — -0.09
30 2013 1684 132.7 +0.51 -1.74 0.944 48.9% -14 +86 +204 48.1% +0.01 12–6 (67%) 5–8 (38%) 100.2 +1.34 2009 1534 114.6 -0.18 -4.49 0.730 44.3% -22 — — 23.8% -2.14 0–3 (0%) — — -0.71
31 2014 1571 119.0 -0.43 -1.17 0.933 48.4% -17 +164 +244 39.5% -0.75 5–4 (56%) 0–2 — +2.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2015 1573 117.2 -0.30 -2.09 0.931 48.5% -5 +70 +227 43.0% -0.67 7–4 (64%) 8–4 (67%) 106.6 -0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2016 1514 111.4 -2.93 -2.64 0.748 43.7% -12 — +237 18.2% -2.18 0–2 1–1 — -0.58 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2017 1527 110.5 -1.92 +0.79 0.967 49.2% — — — 40.0% +0.20 1–0 — — -0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1968 147.9 +2.22 +0.08 1.029 50.6% -7 -28 +111 53.5% +0.29 166–112 (60%) 112–90 (55%) 107.0 +0.52 — 1904 137.9 +1.67 -2.91 0.933 48.8% -6 +25 -17 50.9% +0.08 66–73 (47%) 56–61 (48%) 95.9 +1.59

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.