H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Daniela Hantuchova vs Meghann Shaughnessy H2H: 5-1

Daniela Hantuchova holds a 5–1 lead over Meghann Shaughnessy in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Daniela Hantuchova leads 4–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Daniela Hantuchova won the 2009 US Open first round 6-2 4-6 6-1.

SVK Age 43 Right-Handed 181 cm / 5'11"
H2H
5 1
6 main draw meetings
USA Age 47 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 2, 2009* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Daniela Hantuchova #24 6-2 4-6 6-1 Meghann Shaughnessy #902 Match data
Jun 22, 2007* 's-Hertogenbosch WTA 500 R16 Grass Daniela Hantuchova #10 3-6 6-3 5-3 (ret.) Meghann Shaughnessy #36 Match data
Oct 6, 2005* Filderstadt WTA 500 R32 Hard Daniela Hantuchova #20 6-4 6-0 Meghann Shaughnessy #53 Match data
Jul 29, 2005* Stanford WTA 500 R16 Hard Daniela Hantuchova #24 6-4 3-6 6-1 Meghann Shaughnessy #69 Match data
Jan 10, 2002* Sydney WTA 500 R16 Hard Meghann Shaughnessy #13 6-4 6-1 Daniela Hantuchova #37 Match data
Oct 18, 2001* Zurich WTA 1000 R32 Hard Daniela Hantuchova #53 6-3 6-4 Meghann Shaughnessy #12 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Daniela Hantuchova #317 #5 2,897 1,968 457 361 55.9% 0 2 0 1 4 7
Meghann Shaughnessy #1,104 #11 1,949 1,888 233 233 50.0% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Daniela Hantuchova Meghann Shaughnessy
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1999 0–1 0.0% #197 1,494 0 0
17 2000 6–7 46.2% #108 1,551 0 0 1996 3–4 42.9% #165 1,512 0 0
18 2001 19–16 54.3% #38 1,710 0 0 1997 0–1 0.0% #198 1,499 0 0
19 2002 48–24 66.7% #8 1,919 0 1 1998 8–9 47.1% #69 1,544 0 0
20 2003 26–23 53.1% #19 1,753 0 1 1999 10–22 31.2% #99 1,439 0 0
21 2004 24–24 50.0% #31 1,714 0 1 2000 23–20 53.5% #38 1,652 0 1
22 2005 38–25 60.3% #19 1,877 0 1 2001 45–25 64.3% #12 1,825 0 2
23 2006 35–25 58.3% #17 1,860 0 1 2002 29–27 51.8% #30 1,716 0 2
24 2007 52–26 66.7% #9 1,930 0 3 2003 32–23 58.2% #17 1,725 0 3
25 2008 21–19 52.5% #21 1,756 0 3 2004 20–22 47.6% #40 1,663 0 3
26 2009 37–24 60.7% #24 1,807 0 3 2005 17–25 40.5% #66 1,563 0 3
27 2010 32–24 57.1% #30 1,780 0 3 2006 27–20 57.4% #37 1,709 0 5
28 2011 41–25 62.1% #24 1,790 0 4 2007 18–22 45.0% #52 1,666 0 6
29 2012 22–22 50.0% #32 1,686 0 5 2008 0–5 0.0% #836 1,579 0 6
30 2013 23–24 48.9% #33 1,683 0 6 2009 1–8 11.1% #590 1,533 0 6
31 2014 16–24 40.0% #62 1,577 0 6
32 2015 15–19 44.1% #83 1,574 0 7
33 2016 1–8 11.1% #228 1,514 0 7
34 2017 1–1 50.0% #317 1,524 0 7