H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Daniela Hantuchova vs Monica Seles H2H: 0-1
Monica Seles holds a 1–0 lead over Daniela Hantuchova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Monica Seles leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Monica Seles won the 2002 Roland Garros fourth round 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SVK
Age 43
Right-Handed
181 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 52
Left-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 4, 2002* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R16 | Clay | Monica Seles | 6-4 7-5 | Daniela Hantuchova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniela Hantuchova | #317 | #5 | 2,897 | 1,968 | 457 | 361 | 55.9% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 7 |
| Monica Seles | #223 | #1 | 4,056 | 2,540 | 578 | 121 | 82.7% | 9 | 12 | 3 | 7 | 22 | 53 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Daniela Hantuchova | Monica Seles | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #86 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 33–9 | 78.6% | #6 | 2,002 | 0 | 1 |
| 16 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #197 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 55–6 | 90.2% | #2 | 2,295 | 1 | 10 |
| 17 | 2000 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #108 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 74–6 | 92.5% | #1 | 2,443 | 4 | 20 |
| 18 | 2001 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #38 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 70–5 | 93.3% | #1 | 2,499 | 7 | 30 |
| 19 | 2002 | 48–24 | 66.7% | #8 | 1,919 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 17–2 | 89.5% | #8 | 2,485 | 8 | 32 |
| 20 | 2003 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #19 | 1,753 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2004 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #31 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 11–1 | 91.7% | #1 | 2,487 | 8 | 33 |
| 22 | 2005 | 38–25 | 60.3% | #19 | 1,877 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 43–8 | 84.3% | #2 | 2,342 | 9 | 38 |
| 23 | 2006 | 35–25 | 58.3% | #17 | 1,860 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 45–14 | 76.3% | #5 | 2,159 | 9 | 41 |
| 24 | 2007 | 52–26 | 66.7% | #9 | 1,930 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 42–13 | 76.4% | #6 | 2,174 | 9 | 43 |
| 25 | 2008 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #21 | 1,756 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 36–12 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,116 | 9 | 44 |
| 26 | 2009 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #24 | 1,807 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 51–12 | 81.0% | #4 | 2,144 | 9 | 47 |
| 27 | 2010 | 32–24 | 57.1% | #30 | 1,780 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 40–10 | 80.0% | #10 | 2,127 | 9 | 51 |
| 28 | 2011 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #24 | 1,790 | 0 | 4 | 2002 | 46–13 | 78.0% | #7 | 2,088 | 9 | 53 |
| 29 | 2012 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #32 | 1,686 | 0 | 5 | 2003 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #60 | 1,993 | 9 | 53 |
| 30 | 2013 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #33 | 1,683 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2014 | 16–24 | 40.0% | #62 | 1,577 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2015 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #83 | 1,574 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2016 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #228 | 1,514 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2017 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #317 | 1,524 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |