H2H Match Log

.mobile-filter-details > .mobile-filter-details__toggle { display: none; } .mobile-filter-details > .mobile-filter-details__toggle + .mobile-filter-details__fields { display: flex; flex-wrap: wrap; }

Player	Score	Player	Match Data	Date	Round	Tournament	Category	Surface
Patty Schnyder #47	6-4 6-4	Daniela Hantuchova #30	Match data	Oct 16, 2010*	QF	Linz Open	International → modern equivalent WTA 250	Hard
Daniela Hantuchova #25	6-1 6-4	Patty Schnyder #46	Match data	Mar 26, 2010*	R64	Miami Open	Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000	Hard
Daniela Hantuchova #10	6-4 6-2	Patty Schnyder #17	Match data	Oct 28, 2007*	F	Linz Open	Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500	Hard
Daniela Hantuchova #10	6-3 5-7 7-5	Patty Schnyder #13	Match data	Sep 29, 2007*	QF	Luxembourg	Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500	Hard
Daniela Hantuchova #22	6-2 7-5	Patty Schnyder #8	Match data	Oct 19, 2006*	R32	Zurich	Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000	Hard
Daniela Hantuchova #17	3-6 6-3 6-4	Patty Schnyder #7	Match data	Jan 13, 2006*	R16	Sydney International	Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500	Hard
Patty Schnyder #9	6-2 6-1	Daniela Hantuchova #20	Match data	Oct 29, 2005*	QF	Linz Open	Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500	Hard
Daniela Hantuchova #20	6-4 6-3	Patty Schnyder #10	Match data	Oct 7, 2005*	R16	Porsche Tennis Grand Prix	Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500	Hard
Daniela Hantuchova #21	5-7 6-2 6-4	Patty Schnyder #11	Match data	Aug 26, 2005*	R16	New Haven	Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500	Hard
Patty Schnyder #16	6-4 4-6 7-6(6)	Daniela Hantuchova #32	Match data	Sep 5, 2004*	R32	US Open	Grand Slam	Hard
Patty Schnyder #16	3-6 6-1 6-4	Daniela Hantuchova #36	Match data	Aug 18, 2004*	R32	Athens Olympics	Olympics	Hard
Patty Schnyder #16	6-2 6-2	Daniela Hantuchova #41	Match data	May 5, 2004*	R64	Berlin Open	Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000	Clay
Patty Schnyder #21	6-4 4-6 7-6(3)	Daniela Hantuchova #13	Match data	Sep 26, 2003*	R16	Leipzig	Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500	Carpet
Daniela Hantuchova #8	7-5 6-3	Patty Schnyder #15	Match data	Jan 22, 2003*	R16	Australian Open	Grand Slam	Hard
Patty Schnyder #19	6-7(5) 6-3 7-6(5)	Daniela Hantuchova #9	Match data	Oct 19, 2002*	QF	Zurich	Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000	Hard
Daniela Hantuchova #11	6-4 6-3	Patty Schnyder #24	Match data	Aug 24, 2002*	QF	New Haven	Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500	Hard
Daniela Hantuchova #12	6-3 7-6(3)	Patty Schnyder #25	Match data	Aug 15, 2002*	R32	Canadian Open	Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000	Hard
Patty Schnyder #50	6-3 1-6 7-5	Daniela Hantuchova #53	Match data	Oct 11, 2001*	R32	Porsche Tennis Grand Prix	Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500	Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player	Current	Peak	Pts	Elo	W	L	Win %	GS	1000 including documented historical predecessor categories	Finals	500 including documented historical predecessor categories	250 including documented historical predecessor categories	Titles
Daniela Hantuchova	#317	#5	2,897	1,968	461	365	55.8%	0	2	0	1	4	7
Patty Schnyder	#278	#7	3,050	1,984	495	350	58.6%	0	1	0	1	9	11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age	Daniela Hantuchova							Patty Schnyder
Age	Yr	W-L	Win %	Rank	Elo	GS	Titles	Yr	W-L	Win %	Rank	Elo	GS	Titles
16	1999	0–1	0.0%	#197	1,494	0	0	1995	1–1	50.0%	#143	1,526	0	0
17	2000	6–7	46.2%	#108	1,550	0	0	1996	7–10	41.2%	#64	1,586	0	0
18	2001	19–16	54.3%	#38	1,710	0	0	1997	21–24	46.7%	#26	1,709	0	0
19	2002	48–24	66.7%	#8	1,919	0	1	1998	51–20	71.8%	#11	1,903	0	5
20	2003	26–23	53.1%	#19	1,751	0	1	1999	29–23	55.8%	#21	1,792	0	6
21	2004	25–25	50.0%	#31	1,710	0	1	2000	31–25	55.4%	#25	1,750	0	6
22	2005	38–25	60.3%	#19	1,863	0	1	2001	24–24	50.0%	#37	1,734	0	7
23	2006	35–25	58.3%	#17	1,837	0	1	2002	34–24	58.6%	#15	1,848	0	8
24	2007	52–26	66.7%	#9	1,932	0	3	2003	28–23	54.9%	#23	1,809	0	8
25	2008	22–20	52.4%	#21	1,757	0	3	2004	33–23	58.9%	#14	1,808	0	8
26	2009	37–24	60.7%	#24	1,809	0	3	2005	58–25	69.9%	#7	1,932	0	10
27	2010	32–24	57.1%	#30	1,781	0	3	2006	47–25	65.3%	#9	1,889	0	10
28	2011	41–25	62.1%	#24	1,791	0	4	2007	45–26	63.4%	#16	1,885	0	10
29	2012	24–23	51.1%	#32	1,692	0	5	2008	34–22	60.7%	#14	1,820	0	11
30	2013	23–24	48.9%	#33	1,683	0	6	2009	21–22	48.8%	#42	1,754	0	11
31	2014	16–24	40.0%	#62	1,571	0	6	2010	26–19	57.8%	#44	1,798	0	11
32	2015	15–19	44.1%	#83	1,572	0	7	2011	3–9	25.0%	#55	1,668	0	11
33	2016	1–9	10.0%	#228	1,514	0	7	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
34	2017	1–1	50.0%	#317	1,526	0	7	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
37	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	2016	0–1	0.0%	#324	1,631	0	11
38	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	2017	1–1	50.0%	#148	1,628	0	11
39	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	2018	1–3	25.0%	#278	1,597	0	11

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age	Daniela Hantuchova																	Patty Schnyder
	Yr	Hard				Clay				Grass				Carpet				Yr	Hard				Clay				Grass				Carpet
	Yr	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	Yr	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %
16	1999	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1995	1	1	2	50.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
17	2000	0	2	2	0.0%	2	2	4	50.0%	—	—	—	—	4	3	7	57.1%	1996	0	2	2	0.0%	5	4	9	55.6%	0	1	1	0.0%	2	3	5	40.0%
18	2001	4	8	12	33.3%	5	4	9	55.6%	5	2	7	71.4%	5	2	7	71.4%	1997	9	9	18	50.0%	11	10	21	52.4%	0	2	2	0.0%	1	3	4	25.0%
19	2002	28	13	41	68.3%	10	6	16	62.5%	6	2	8	75.0%	4	3	7	57.1%	1998	17	9	26	65.4%	27	6	33	81.8%	1	2	3	33.3%	6	3	9	66.7%
20	2003	12	12	24	50.0%	8	6	14	57.1%	2	2	4	50.0%	4	3	7	57.1%	1999	16	10	26	61.5%	12	8	20	60.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	1	4	5	20.0%
21	2004	13	14	27	48.1%	2	5	7	28.6%	7	3	10	70.0%	3	3	6	50.0%	2000	15	11	26	57.7%	9	8	17	52.9%	3	2	5	60.0%	4	4	8	50.0%
22	2005	31	17	48	64.6%	3	4	7	42.9%	2	3	5	40.0%	2	1	3	66.7%	2001	11	10	21	52.4%	11	10	21	52.4%	2	2	4	50.0%	0	2	2	0.0%
23	2006	26	18	44	59.1%	5	4	9	55.6%	3	2	5	60.0%	1	1	2	50.0%	2002	14	10	24	58.3%	16	10	26	61.5%	1	2	3	33.3%	3	2	5	60.0%
24	2007	36	18	54	66.7%	8	4	12	66.7%	8	3	11	72.7%	0	1	1	0.0%	2003	14	9	23	60.9%	10	9	19	52.6%	0	1	1	0.0%	4	4	8	50.0%
25	2008	20	17	37	54.1%	0	1	1	0.0%	1	1	2	50.0%	1	1	2	50.0%	2004	18	12	30	60.0%	11	6	17	64.7%	4	3	7	57.1%	0	2	2	0.0%
26	2009	23	15	38	60.5%	8	6	14	57.1%	5	2	7	71.4%	1	1	2	50.0%	2005	42	17	59	71.2%	15	6	21	71.4%	0	1	1	0.0%	1	1	2	50.0%
27	2010	24	18	42	57.1%	6	4	10	60.0%	2	2	4	50.0%	—	—	—	—	2006	30	15	45	66.7%	12	7	19	63.2%	1	1	2	50.0%	4	2	6	66.7%
28	2011	20	16	36	55.6%	12	6	18	66.7%	9	3	12	75.0%	—	—	—	—	2007	30	18	48	62.5%	12	6	18	66.7%	3	1	4	75.0%	0	1	1	0.0%
29	2012	21	19	40	52.5%	—	—	—	—	3	4	7	42.9%	—	—	—	—	2008	25	16	41	61.0%	9	5	14	64.3%	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—
30	2013	15	17	32	46.9%	2	5	7	28.6%	6	2	8	75.0%	—	—	—	—	2009	8	12	20	40.0%	12	8	20	60.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	1	1	2	50.0%
31	2014	5	15	20	25.0%	8	5	13	61.5%	2	3	5	40.0%	1	1	2	50.0%	2010	11	9	20	55.0%	14	8	22	63.6%	0	1	1	0.0%	1	1	2	50.0%
32	2015	11	12	23	47.8%	0	4	4	0.0%	4	3	7	57.1%	—	—	—	—	2011	3	4	7	42.9%	0	5	5	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
33	2016	0	6	6	0.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	1	2	3	33.3%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
34	2017	1	1	2	50.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
37	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	2016	—	—	—	—	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
38	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	2017	—	—	—	—	1	1	2	50.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
39	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	2018	0	1	1	0.0%	1	2	3	33.3%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Career	—	290	239	529	54.8%	79	67	146	54.1%	66	39	105	62.9%	26	20	46	56.5%	—	264	175	439	60.1%	188	120	308	61.0%	15	22	37	40.5%	28	33	61	45.9%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 512/705 of Daniela Hantuchova's and 311/496 of Patty Schnyder's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age	Daniela Hantuchova											Patty Schnyder
Age	Yr	Sample	Aces/M	DFs/M	1st Sv%	1st Pts%	2nd Pts%	BP Saved%	BP Conv%	Svc Pts%	Ret Pts%	Yr	Sample	Aces/M	DFs/M	1st Sv%	1st Pts%	2nd Pts%	BP Saved%	BP Conv%	Svc Pts%	Ret Pts%
20	2003	7/49	2.1	2.6	61.5%	62.8%	53.0%	46.0%	45.9%	59.1%	46.5%	—	—/—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
21	2004	8/50	2.6	3.0	59.5%	62.1%	44.2%	43.0%	64.2%	55.1%	40.9%	—	—/—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
22	2005	15/63	4.0	3.2	58.2%	69.2%	46.3%	50.6%	45.0%	59.1%	47.9%	—	—/—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
23	2006	42/60	3.4	2.7	63.8%	66.1%	44.7%	56.1%	46.8%	58.5%	42.5%	—	—/—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
24	2007	74/78	3.5	2.6	65.4%	68.4%	47.9%	58.5%	49.2%	61.2%	45.2%	2003	7/51	2.3	1.3	62.4%	65.7%	61.0%	60.5%	42.0%	63.0%	42.9%
25	2008	36/42	2.1	2.2	64.4%	64.5%	45.8%	57.0%	50.2%	57.8%	43.5%	2004	12/56	3.3	3.0	61.5%	66.1%	51.6%	45.1%	45.4%	60.7%	45.6%
26	2009	57/61	2.4	2.4	63.3%	63.3%	46.3%	49.7%	49.1%	57.1%	43.5%	2005	20/83	3.7	2.4	60.5%	64.6%	49.7%	59.6%	51.8%	58.6%	45.3%
27	2010	49/56	2.7	2.6	64.9%	64.3%	46.9%	52.9%	49.4%	58.1%	43.8%	2006	50/72	3.8	2.2	63.4%	65.7%	51.4%	61.6%	49.7%	60.3%	45.6%
28	2011	64/66	3.2	2.6	62.8%	65.9%	49.7%	59.9%	47.6%	59.8%	45.0%	2007	66/71	3.2	2.3	65.5%	66.1%	52.0%	58.4%	49.6%	61.1%	45.3%
29	2012	38/47	2.4	3.7	62.2%	63.6%	45.7%	53.2%	51.4%	56.9%	41.3%	2008	51/56	2.6	2.4	63.7%	64.1%	50.4%	55.4%	43.9%	59.2%	44.8%
30	2013	42/47	2.6	3.4	60.9%	63.1%	43.8%	50.7%	46.6%	55.7%	41.8%	2009	42/43	2.5	2.5	61.8%	61.6%	51.0%	56.5%	52.6%	57.4%	42.2%
31	2014	37/40	2.3	3.8	62.5%	61.8%	44.7%	51.5%	43.1%	55.5%	41.5%	2010	44/45	2.2	2.3	63.9%	60.2%	47.9%	54.6%	45.7%	55.7%	43.1%
32	2015	32/34	2.1	3.9	66.6%	62.2%	47.7%	44.5%	46.3%	57.3%	39.7%	2011	12/12	1.8	2.6	61.5%	55.2%	44.6%	47.4%	46.7%	51.2%	37.7%
33	2016	9/10	2.4	3.4	60.6%	53.1%	39.7%	35.1%	52.9%	48.3%	38.7%	—	—/—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
34	2017	2/2	3.0	5.5	65.7%	66.4%	37.9%	50.0%	39.2%	56.7%	41.9%	—	—/—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
37	—	—/—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	2016	1/1	1.0	3.0	58.2%	54.7%	41.3%	66.7%	57.1%	49.1%	52.3%
38	—	—/—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	2017	2/2	3.5	3.5	64.6%	64.7%	55.9%	67.9%	30.6%	61.7%	39.6%
39	—	—/—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	2018	4/4	1.0	2.3	66.7%	59.9%	44.0%	41.5%	33.6%	54.4%	39.3%
Career	—	512/826	2.8	2.9	63.4%	64.6%	46.5%	53.3%	48.3%	58.0%	43.2%	—	311/845	2.9	2.4	63.4%	63.6%	50.6%	56.7%	47.9%	58.7%	44.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age	Daniela Hantuchova																Patty Schnyder
Age	Yr	Elo	P+	Serve+	Return+	PD	TPW%	Hard Elo	Clay Elo	Grass Elo	Set Win %	Set Margin	Dec. Set	Tiebreak	Pressure+	Schedule	Yr	Elo	P+	Serve+	Return+	PD	TPW%	Hard Elo	Clay Elo	Grass Elo	Set Win %	Set Margin	Dec. Set	Tiebreak	Pressure+	Schedule
16	1999	1494	105.1	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0.0%	-2.00	—	—	—	-0.20	1995	1527	112.0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	40.0%	-1.40	1–0	—	—	-0.07
17	2000	1550	115.3	—	—	—	—	+15	-2	—	44.8%	-0.73	2–3 (40%)	2–1 (67%)	101.1	+0.04	1996	1586	120.2	—	—	—	—	-33	+52	—	40.5%	-0.76	5–3 (63%)	4–3 (57%)	105.4	-0.06
18	2001	1710	143.1	—	—	—	—	-61	-102	+42	55.0%	+0.45	4–8 (33%)	4–6 (40%)	98.9	-1.24	1997	1710	151.6	—	—	—	—	-46	+9	—	50.0%	+0.26	1–11 (8%)	4–5 (44%)	90.4	-0.80
19	2002	1920	160.1	—	—	—	—	-36	-168	-31	63.3%	+1.02	13–9 (59%)	10–4 (71%)	108.1	+1.09	1998	1903	159.4	—	—	—	—	-62	+111	-333	66.7%	+1.21	15–12 (56%)	10–5 (67%)	109.2	-0.16
20	2003	1752	137.7	+1.71	+1.73	1.137	52.9%	+26	+6	+110	50.9%	-0.12	9–5 (64%)	12–5 (71%)	106.4	+2.36	1999	1792	148.7	—	—	—	—	+35	+80	—	54.3%	-0.08	13–12 (52%)	8–1 (89%)	102.0	-0.13
21	2004	1710	131.4	+0.32	-0.58	0.910	48.4%	+1	-22	+176	46.7%	-0.17	11–6 (65%)	9–8 (53%)	103.9	-0.74	2000	1751	142.6	—	—	—	—	+23	+53	-191	53.4%	+0.31	11–8 (58%)	9–5 (64%)	103.8	-1.04
22	2005	1863	153.2	+2.43	+2.83	1.170	53.1%	+26	-199	-56	56.1%	+0.53	13–6 (68%)	6–8 (43%)	103.6	-0.05	2001	1734	129.7	—	—	—	—	-24	+33	-136	53.1%	-0.08	7–14 (33%)	7–4 (64%)	95.1	+0.22
23	2006	1838	147.6	+2.67	-0.32	1.025	50.7%	+7	-127	+7	54.0%	+0.26	17–8 (68%)	8–4 (67%)	107.0	+0.07	2002	1848	146.2	—	—	—	—	-30	-40	-263	53.7%	+0.32	15–7 (68%)	10–5 (67%)	109.0	-1.16
24	2007	1932	154.4	+5.20	+1.87	1.165	53.3%	-6	-130	+1	63.3%	+0.90	15–10 (60%)	14–4 (78%)	108.1	+2.67	2003	1810	143.5	+3.50	+0.33	1.160	53.0%	+28	-43	—	51.4%	+0.06	7–4 (64%)	5–5 (50%)	100.7	+0.37
25	2008	1757	140.8	+2.10	-0.03	1.032	50.5%	+2	—	—	53.2%	+0.13	6–6 (50%)	5–3 (63%)	97.7	+0.80	2004	1809	142.7	+3.52	+0.81	1.159	52.9%	+2	+9	-226	59.7%	+0.61	12–8 (60%)	5–5 (50%)	99.4	+1.41
26	2009	1809	138.5	+1.75	-0.25	1.015	50.3%	-33	-39	+107	55.7%	+0.39	18–9 (67%)	11–5 (69%)	106.6	+1.00	2005	1932	158.1	+2.86	+1.20	1.093	51.8%	-18	+31	—	66.2%	+1.20	19–17 (53%)	8–7 (53%)	99.0	+3.23
27	2010	1782	145.6	+2.86	+0.69	1.046	51.1%	-3	-1	+88	55.6%	+0.57	10–10 (50%)	4–7 (36%)	95.2	-1.22	2006	1890	156.1	+3.89	+1.47	1.148	53.0%	+35	+25	—	62.8%	+0.85	10–8 (56%)	12–7 (63%)	102.4	+1.42
28	2011	1791	150.0	+3.89	+1.34	1.119	52.5%	-42	+70	+168	60.4%	+0.95	11–10 (52%)	8–9 (47%)	99.6	-1.84	2007	1886	151.5	+4.70	+1.91	1.163	53.3%	-17	+90	-218	61.6%	+1.02	13–13 (50%)	4–7 (36%)	94.4	+2.16
29	2012	1692	138.5	+1.52	-0.83	0.958	49.3%	+8	—	+159	46.3%	-0.01	12–6 (67%)	5–11 (31%)	98.0	-1.10	2008	1821	141.5	+3.54	+0.46	1.097	51.8%	-3	+98	—	57.7%	+0.47	11–9 (55%)	10–3 (77%)	102.4	+2.47
30	2013	1684	132.7	+0.51	-1.74	0.944	48.9%	-14	+86	+204	48.1%	+0.01	12–6 (67%)	5–8 (38%)	100.2	+1.34	2009	1754	137.4	+1.61	-0.95	0.991	49.8%	-10	+114	—	49.0%	-0.07	7–5 (58%)	8–2 (80%)	103.6	-1.38
31	2014	1571	119.0	-0.43	-1.17	0.933	48.4%	-17	+164	+244	39.5%	-0.75	5–4 (56%)	0–2	—	+2.28	2010	1799	133.5	-0.01	-0.10	0.972	49.4%	-35	+64	—	51.0%	+0.09	12–2 (86%)	3–8 (27%)	104.3	-1.95
32	2015	1573	117.2	-0.30	-2.09	0.931	48.5%	-5	+70	+227	43.0%	-0.67	7–4 (64%)	8–4 (67%)	106.6	-0.22	2011	1668	112.8	-2.14	-2.61	0.773	44.9%	+67	+63	—	27.6%	-1.34	3–2 (60%)	2–0	—	-0.02
33	2016	1514	111.4	-2.93	-2.64	0.748	43.7%	-12	—	+237	18.2%	-2.18	0–2	1–1	—	-0.58	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
34	2017	1527	110.5	-1.92	+0.79	0.967	49.2%	—	—	—	40.0%	+0.20	1–0	—	—	-0.21	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
37	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	2016	1632	99.5	-0.77	+0.04	1.027	50.7%	—	—	—	33.3%	0.00	0–1	—	—	-0.10
38	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	2017	1628	107.6	-0.85	-0.91	1.035	50.3%	—	—	—	50.0%	+0.34	1–1	1–2 (33%)	—	+0.25
39	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	2018	1597	111.4	-1.17	-1.12	0.861	46.5%	—	+29	—	22.2%	-1.22	1–0	0–1	—	-0.22
Career	—	1968	147.9	+2.22	+0.08	1.029	50.6%	-7	-28	+111	53.5%	+0.29	166–112 (60%)	112–90 (55%)	107.0	+0.52	—	1984	151.9	+2.71	+0.57	1.069	51.4%	-6	+46	-221	56.5%	+0.46	164–137 (54%)	110–75 (59%)	105.5	+0.53

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.

Daniela Hantuchova's most-played WTA rivals
Opponent	W	L	M	Last Played	H2H
Patty Schnyder	10	8	18	Oct 16, 2010	H2H
Svetlana Kuznetsova	4	11	15	Jan 20, 2016	H2H
Elena Dementieva	4	11	15	Sep 5, 2010	H2H
Sara Errani	6	5	11	May 13, 2015	H2H
Maria Sharapova	2	9	11	Jan 31, 2014	H2H

Patty Schnyder's most-played WTA rivals
Opponent	W	L	M	Last Played	H2H
Daniela Hantuchova	8	10	18	Oct 16, 2010	H2H
Elena Dementieva	8	10	18	Sep 4, 2008	H2H
Amélie Mauresmo	5	13	18	Aug 22, 2008	H2H
Nadia Petrova	8	7	15	Mar 13, 2010	H2H
Serena Williams	4	8	12	May 6, 2009	H2H