H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Daniela Hantuchova vs Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor H2H: 0-1

Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor holds a 1–0 lead over Daniela Hantuchova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor won the 2000 Oklahoma round of 16 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Daniela Hantuchova
SVK Age 43 Right-Handed 181 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor
FRA Age 50 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor #35 6-2 6-3 Daniela Hantuchova #193 Match data Feb 25, 2000* R16 Oklahoma Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Daniela Hantuchova #317 #5 2,897 1,968 461 365 55.8% 0 2 0 1 4 7
Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor #739 #29 917 1,771 109 123 47.0% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Daniela Hantuchova Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1999 0–1 0.0% #197 1,494 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2000 6–7 46.2% #108 1,550 0 0 1993 1–3 25.0% #167 1,500 0 0
18 2001 19–16 54.3% #38 1,710 0 0 1994 2–5 28.6% #122 1,501 0 0
19 2002 48–24 66.7% #8 1,919 0 1 1995 7–12 36.8% #94 1,499 0 0
20 2003 26–23 53.1% #19 1,751 0 1 1996 12–12 50.0% #85 1,604 0 0
21 2004 25–25 50.0% #31 1,710 0 1 1997 14–17 45.2% #57 1,621 0 0
22 2005 38–25 60.3% #19 1,863 0 1 1998 21–21 50.0% #33 1,723 0 0
23 2006 35–25 58.3% #17 1,837 0 1 1999 28–21 57.1% #36 1,708 0 1
24 2007 52–26 66.7% #9 1,932 0 3 2000 19–19 50.0% #65 1,685 0 1
25 2008 22–20 52.4% #21 1,757 0 3 2001 5–13 27.8% #160 1,584 0 1
26 2009 37–24 60.7% #24 1,809 0 3 — — — — — — —
27 2010 32–24 57.1% #30 1,781 0 3 — — — — — — —
28 2011 41–25 62.1% #24 1,791 0 4 — — — — — — —
29 2012 24–23 51.1% #32 1,692 0 5 — — — — — — —
30 2013 23–24 48.9% #33 1,683 0 6 — — — — — — —
31 2014 16–24 40.0% #62 1,571 0 6 — — — — — — —
32 2015 15–19 44.1% #83 1,572 0 7 — — — — — — —
33 2016 1–9 10.0% #228 1,514 0 7 — — — — — — —
34 2017 1–1 50.0% #317 1,526 0 7 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Daniela Hantuchova Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1999 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2000 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 1993 — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
18 2001 4 8 12 33.3% 5 4 9 55.6% 5 2 7 71.4% 5 2 7 71.4% 1994 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
19 2002 28 13 41 68.3% 10 6 16 62.5% 6 2 8 75.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1995 3 6 9 33.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 2003 12 12 24 50.0% 8 6 14 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1996 3 3 6 50.0% 8 7 15 53.3% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
21 2004 13 14 27 48.1% 2 5 7 28.6% 7 3 10 70.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1997 5 7 12 41.7% 7 6 13 53.8% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 2005 31 17 48 64.6% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1998 8 8 16 50.0% 8 7 15 53.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
23 2006 26 18 44 59.1% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1999 4 7 11 36.4% 16 7 23 69.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 6 6 12 50.0%
24 2007 36 18 54 66.7% 8 4 12 66.7% 8 3 11 72.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2000 7 7 14 50.0% 6 8 14 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
25 2008 20 17 37 54.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2001 2 6 8 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2009 23 15 38 60.5% 8 6 14 57.1% 5 2 7 71.4% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2010 24 18 42 57.1% 6 4 10 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2011 20 16 36 55.6% 12 6 18 66.7% 9 3 12 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2012 21 19 40 52.5% — — — — 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2013 15 17 32 46.9% 2 5 7 28.6% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2014 5 15 20 25.0% 8 5 13 61.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2015 11 12 23 47.8% 0 4 4 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2016 0 6 6 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2017 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 290 239 529 54.8% 79 67 146 54.1% 66 39 105 62.9% 26 20 46 56.5% — 32 45 77 41.6% 54 51 105 51.4% 6 11 17 35.3% 17 16 33 51.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Daniela Hantuchova Sarah Pitkowski-Malcor
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1999 1494 105.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2000 1550 115.3 — — — — +15 -2 — 44.8% -0.73 2–3 (40%) 2–1 (67%) 101.1 +0.04 1993 1500 99.2 — — — — — +21 — 22.2% -1.11 1–0 0–1 — -0.37
18 2001 1710 143.1 — — — — -61 -102 +42 55.0% +0.45 4–8 (33%) 4–6 (40%) 98.9 -1.24 1994 1501 106.6 — — — — +33 +24 — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 1–1 — -0.18
19 2002 1920 160.1 — — — — -36 -168 -31 63.3% +1.02 13–9 (59%) 10–4 (71%) 108.1 +1.09 1995 1499 114.1 — — — — +22 +53 — 41.3% -0.57 3–5 (38%) 0–2 — +1.84
20 2003 1752 137.7 +1.71 +1.73 1.137 52.9% +26 +6 +110 50.9% -0.12 9–5 (64%) 12–5 (71%) 106.4 +2.36 1996 1605 116.8 — — — — -51 +10 — 49.1% -0.17 3–2 (60%) 2–4 (33%) 101.4 +0.63
21 2004 1710 131.4 +0.32 -0.58 0.910 48.4% +1 -22 +176 46.7% -0.17 11–6 (65%) 9–8 (53%) 103.9 -0.74 1997 1622 127.2 — — — — -60 +70 -53 42.3% -0.52 7–4 (64%) 3–2 (60%) 104.9 +0.34
22 2005 1863 153.2 +2.43 +2.83 1.170 53.1% +26 -199 -56 56.1% +0.53 13–6 (68%) 6–8 (43%) 103.6 -0.05 1998 1723 142.2 — — — — -8 +16 -196 51.5% -0.22 7–8 (47%) 3–3 (50%) 103.8 -2.23
23 2006 1838 147.6 +2.67 -0.32 1.025 50.7% +7 -127 +7 54.0% +0.26 17–8 (68%) 8–4 (67%) 107.0 +0.07 1999 1708 133.4 — — — — -20 +50 -170 53.7% +0.36 8–4 (67%) 4–2 (67%) 104.9 +1.32
24 2007 1932 154.4 +5.20 +1.87 1.165 53.3% -6 -130 +1 63.3% +0.90 15–10 (60%) 14–4 (78%) 108.1 +2.67 2000 1685 129.4 — — — — +41 -11 -131 49.4% -0.17 8–3 (73%) 3–1 (75%) 107.1 -0.58
25 2008 1757 140.8 +2.10 -0.03 1.032 50.5% +2 — — 53.2% +0.13 6–6 (50%) 5–3 (63%) 97.7 +0.80 2001 1584 110.0 — — — — +63 +22 — 35.7% -1.17 1–5 (17%) 2–2 (50%) 94.5 -0.91
26 2009 1809 138.5 +1.75 -0.25 1.015 50.3% -33 -39 +107 55.7% +0.39 18–9 (67%) 11–5 (69%) 106.6 +1.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2010 1782 145.6 +2.86 +0.69 1.046 51.1% -3 -1 +88 55.6% +0.57 10–10 (50%) 4–7 (36%) 95.2 -1.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2011 1791 150.0 +3.89 +1.34 1.119 52.5% -42 +70 +168 60.4% +0.95 11–10 (52%) 8–9 (47%) 99.6 -1.84 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2012 1692 138.5 +1.52 -0.83 0.958 49.3% +8 — +159 46.3% -0.01 12–6 (67%) 5–11 (31%) 98.0 -1.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2013 1684 132.7 +0.51 -1.74 0.944 48.9% -14 +86 +204 48.1% +0.01 12–6 (67%) 5–8 (38%) 100.2 +1.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2014 1571 119.0 -0.43 -1.17 0.933 48.4% -17 +164 +244 39.5% -0.75 5–4 (56%) 0–2 — +2.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2015 1573 117.2 -0.30 -2.09 0.931 48.5% -5 +70 +227 43.0% -0.67 7–4 (64%) 8–4 (67%) 106.6 -0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2016 1514 111.4 -2.93 -2.64 0.748 43.7% -12 — +237 18.2% -2.18 0–2 1–1 — -0.58 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2017 1527 110.5 -1.92 +0.79 0.967 49.2% — — — 40.0% +0.20 1–0 — — -0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1968 147.9 +2.22 +0.08 1.029 50.6% -7 -28 +111 53.5% +0.29 166–112 (60%) 112–90 (55%) 107.0 +0.52 — 1771 132.0 — — — — -2 +30 -126 46.9% -0.27 38–32 (54%) 18–18 (50%) 106.9 -0.06

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.