H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Daniela Hantuchova vs Virginia Ruano Pascual H2H: 1-0
Daniela Hantuchova holds a 1–0 lead over Virginia Ruano Pascual in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Daniela Hantuchova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Daniela Hantuchova won the 2008 Australian Open third round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SVK
Age 43
Right-Handed
181 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 52
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 20, 2008* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Daniela Hantuchova | 6-2 6-3 | Virginia Ruano Pascual | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniela Hantuchova | #317 | #5 | 2,897 | 1,968 | 457 | 361 | 55.9% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 7 |
| Virginia Ruano Pascual | #998 | #28 | 893 | 1,819 | 199 | 235 | 45.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Daniela Hantuchova | Virginia Ruano Pascual | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #197 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #307 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2000 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #108 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #194 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2001 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #38 | 1,710 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #137 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2002 | 48–24 | 66.7% | #8 | 1,919 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #126 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2003 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #19 | 1,753 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #171 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2004 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #31 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #61 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2005 | 38–25 | 60.3% | #19 | 1,877 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #87 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2006 | 35–25 | 58.3% | #17 | 1,860 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 18–10 | 64.3% | #52 | 1,730 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2007 | 52–26 | 66.7% | #9 | 1,930 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #32 | 1,774 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2008 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #21 | 1,756 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #85 | 1,659 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2009 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #24 | 1,807 | 0 | 3 | 2000 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #89 | 1,644 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2010 | 32–24 | 57.1% | #30 | 1,780 | 0 | 3 | 2001 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #56 | 1,607 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2011 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #24 | 1,790 | 0 | 4 | 2002 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #65 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2012 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #32 | 1,686 | 0 | 5 | 2003 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #55 | 1,694 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2013 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #33 | 1,683 | 0 | 6 | 2004 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #64 | 1,646 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2014 | 16–24 | 40.0% | #62 | 1,577 | 0 | 6 | 2005 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #107 | 1,560 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | 2015 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #83 | 1,574 | 0 | 7 | 2006 | 15–13 | 53.6% | #66 | 1,659 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | 2016 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #228 | 1,514 | 0 | 7 | 2007 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #81 | 1,630 | 0 | 3 |
| 34 | 2017 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #317 | 1,524 | 0 | 7 | 2008 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #107 | 1,622 | 0 | 3 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #200 | 1,621 | 0 | 3 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #998 | 1,591 | 0 | 3 |