Danielle Collins
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Iga Swiatek | 2 | 8 | 10 | Jul 5, 2025 | H2H |
| Aryna Sabalenka | 0 | 7 | 7 | Mar 24, 2025 | H2H |
| Elise Mertens | 4 | 3 | 7 | Apr 6, 2024 | H2H |
| Ons Jabeur | 3 | 2 | 5 | Jan 7, 2025 | H2H |
| Caroline Garcia | 5 | 0 | 5 | May 12, 2024 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Danielle Collins vs Lauren Davis H2H: 1-0
Danielle Collins holds a 1–0 lead over Lauren Davis in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Danielle Collins leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Danielle Collins won the 2021 Indian Wells Open second round 6-1 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
1
–
0
1 main-draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Danielle Collins | 6-1 (ret.) | Lauren Davis | Match data | Oct 9, 2021* | R64 | Indian Wells Open | WTA 1000 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Danielle Collins | #343 | #7 | 3,702 | 2,073 | 174 | 118 | 59.6% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| Lauren Davis | #499 | #26 | 1,646 | 1,837 | 143 | 182 | 44.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Danielle Collins | Lauren Davis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #319 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #91 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #70 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #915 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #55 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #88 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #259 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 15–9 | 62.5% | #61 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #177 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #50 | 1,624 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2018 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #36 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #173 | 1,603 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2019 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #29 | 1,717 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #64 | 1,733 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2020 | 10–6 | 62.5% | #45 | 1,812 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #75 | 1,622 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2021 | 37–15 | 71.2% | #29 | 1,891 | 0 | 2 | 2021 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #89 | 1,646 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2022 | 20–11 | 64.5% | #14 | 1,898 | 0 | 2 | 2022 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #87 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2023 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #52 | 1,854 | 0 | 2 | 2023 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #68 | 1,682 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2024 | 38–16 | 70.4% | #11 | 1,950 | 0 | 4 | 2024 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #270 | 1,625 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2025 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #64 | 1,859 | 0 | 4 | 2025 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #362 | 1,592 | 0 | 2 |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Danielle Collins | Lauren Davis | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 11 | 12 | 23 | 47.8% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 20 | 2014 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 13 | 12 | 25 | 52.0% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 7 | 14 | 21 | 33.3% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% |
| 22 | 2016 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 15 | 6 | 21 | 71.4% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 23 | 2017 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 14 | 13 | 27 | 51.9% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% |
| 24 | 2018 | 14 | 10 | 24 | 58.3% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 2018 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2019 | 10 | 11 | 21 | 47.6% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 2019 | 5 | 8 | 13 | 38.5% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% |
| 26 | 2020 | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 4 | 1 | 5 | 80.0% | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2021 | 25 | 11 | 36 | 69.4% | 11 | 3 | 14 | 78.6% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2021 | 5 | 9 | 14 | 35.7% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% |
| 28 | 2022 | 17 | 6 | 23 | 73.9% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2022 | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% |
| 29 | 2023 | 17 | 15 | 32 | 53.1% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2023 | 10 | 8 | 18 | 55.6% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% |
| 30 | 2024 | 16 | 10 | 26 | 61.5% | 19 | 5 | 24 | 79.2% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 2024 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 31 | 2025 | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 2025 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 111 | 79 | 190 | 58.4% | 52 | 28 | 80 | 65.0% | 11 | 11 | 22 | 50.0% | — | 97 | 113 | 210 | 46.2% | 25 | 41 | 66 | 37.9% | 21 | 28 | 49 | 42.9% |
Performance Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 279/293 of Danielle Collins's and 304/325 of Lauren Davis's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Danielle Collins | Lauren Davis | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 17 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 3/3 | 0.7 | 3.0 | 49.5% | 55.1% | 40.4% | 46.3% | 16.7% | 47.3% | 23.6% |
| 18 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 10/10 | 1.0 | 2.2 | 66.5% | 59.2% | 48.6% | 48.5% | 36.9% | 55.6% | 42.9% |
| 19 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 23/30 | 0.7 | 2.6 | 62.6% | 56.8% | 42.6% | 49.6% | 41.8% | 51.6% | 39.9% |
| 20 | 2014 | 1/1 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 59.0% | 63.3% | 52.9% | 64.3% | 20.0% | 59.0% | 32.3% | 2014 | 38/41 | 0.8 | 2.9 | 63.1% | 60.7% | 42.4% | 47.5% | 42.8% | 54.0% | 42.8% |
| 21 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 29/34 | 1.0 | 4.4 | 64.0% | 63.0% | 46.0% | 43.8% | 54.2% | 56.8% | 40.7% |
| 22 | 2016 | 1/1 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 55.3% | 26.9% | 42.9% | 30.0% | 50.0% | 34.0% | 36.6% | 2016 | 19/24 | 1.6 | 2.9 | 59.7% | 62.9% | 44.5% | 51.5% | 50.5% | 55.7% | 45.3% |
| 23 | 2017 | 1/1 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 56.3% | 37.0% | 33.3% | 25.0% | 33.3% | 35.4% | 40.0% | 2017 | 41/42 | 1.4 | 5.6 | 60.5% | 59.3% | 40.8% | 50.4% | 56.0% | 52.1% | 47.6% |
| 24 | 2018 | 30/35 | 2.4 | 3.2 | 58.0% | 60.3% | 46.2% | 47.0% | 47.7% | 54.1% | 41.8% | 2018 | 8/8 | 1.5 | 6.3 | 59.3% | 57.6% | 37.5% | 54.0% | 48.6% | 49.5% | 41.6% |
| 25 | 2019 | 35/36 | 3.2 | 3.1 | 59.4% | 62.0% | 47.0% | 51.0% | 52.5% | 56.2% | 41.8% | 2019 | 21/21 | 1.6 | 3.4 | 61.4% | 60.2% | 48.6% | 60.3% | 50.7% | 55.7% | 41.3% |
| 26 | 2020 | 16/16 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 58.9% | 71.1% | 48.3% | 61.6% | 48.3% | 61.3% | 43.8% | 2020 | 14/14 | 1.4 | 1.7 | 66.5% | 57.2% | 45.3% | 49.9% | 52.1% | 53.2% | 43.2% |
| 27 | 2021 | 52/52 | 3.6 | 3.9 | 54.6% | 70.3% | 48.5% | 54.9% | 54.3% | 60.2% | 46.1% | 2021 | 28/28 | 1.9 | 3.0 | 55.3% | 63.8% | 44.5% | 46.1% | 45.0% | 55.1% | 42.0% |
| 28 | 2022 | 31/31 | 3.8 | 6.1 | 54.1% | 69.6% | 48.1% | 57.9% | 52.5% | 59.6% | 45.1% | 2022 | 30/30 | 2.1 | 3.4 | 56.8% | 64.4% | 42.8% | 50.4% | 50.5% | 54.9% | 42.7% |
| 29 | 2023 | 36/36 | 3.6 | 4.6 | 59.0% | 67.2% | 47.2% | 55.1% | 48.1% | 58.8% | 42.2% | 2023 | 30/30 | 1.6 | 3.4 | 61.1% | 61.0% | 45.3% | 48.1% | 52.8% | 54.9% | 42.8% |
| 30 | 2024 | 50/54 | 3.8 | 4.8 | 56.5% | 71.1% | 47.4% | 58.9% | 52.9% | 60.8% | 45.4% | 2024 | 5/5 | 0.6 | 3.0 | 56.6% | 48.9% | 39.4% | 44.0% | 51.9% | 43.5% | 35.7% |
| 31 | 2025 | 26/30 | 4.2 | 5.2 | 57.9% | 66.1% | 49.5% | 55.1% | 51.5% | 58.8% | 41.9% | 2025 | 5/5 | 0.8 | 1.6 | 57.8% | 48.9% | 44.0% | 47.2% | 43.9% | 47.3% | 41.8% |
| Career | — | 279/293 | 3.5 | 4.3 | 57.0% | 67.2% | 47.7% | 54.9% | 51.3% | 58.7% | 43.7% | — | 304/325 | 1.4 | 3.5 | 60.8% | 60.5% | 43.8% | 49.3% | 48.9% | 53.9% | 42.7% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Danielle Collins | Lauren Davis | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 1469 | 96.1 | -1.99 | -3.92 | 0.448 | 35.8% | +25 | — | — | 0.0% | -3.83 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.06 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 1497 | 108.5 | -1.41 | -0.02 | 0.967 | 49.1% | +2 | +46 | — | 42.9% | -0.10 | 0–1 | 1–2 (33%) | — | +0.28 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1576 | 111.7 | -3.39 | -2.88 | 0.824 | 45.7% | +11 | -54 | -36 | 40.6% | -1.01 | 7–4 (64%) | 6–2 (75%) | 108.1 | -0.03 |
| 20 | 2014 | 1498 | 107.7 | +4.54 | +2.42 | 0.787 | 44.9% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -2.67 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | -0.24 | 2014 | 1654 | 126.2 | -1.49 | -0.23 | 0.930 | 48.3% | -1 | -154 | +33 | 51.1% | -0.11 | 6–4 (60%) | 5–1 (83%) | 105.7 | +0.07 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 1580 | 117.4 | -0.82 | -0.57 | 0.941 | 48.6% | -2 | -59 | +76 | 36.0% | -1.15 | 6–5 (55%) | 7–4 (64%) | 103.8 | -1.82 |
| 22 | 2016 | 1492 | 98.2 | -2.62 | -4.63 | 0.555 | 35.2% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.50 | — | — | — | +0.13 | 2016 | 1699 | 128.3 | -1.36 | +1.29 | 1.023 | 50.4% | +49 | — | — | 57.1% | +0.29 | 6–4 (60%) | 2–1 (67%) | 104.7 | -0.31 |
| 23 | 2017 | 1484 | 100.8 | -2.48 | +1.44 | 0.619 | 37.6% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -5.00 | — | — | — | -0.14 | 2017 | 1624 | 128.1 | -3.03 | +3.62 | 0.995 | 50.0% | +63 | -69 | -64 | 47.4% | -0.11 | 6–7 (46%) | 4–3 (57%) | 99.9 | +0.39 |
| 24 | 2018 | 1659 | 126.6 | -1.48 | -1.03 | 0.910 | 48.1% | +14 | -93 | -38 | 46.8% | -0.30 | 9–4 (69%) | 2–2 (50%) | 106.1 | +0.97 | 2018 | 1603 | 108.4 | -2.94 | -0.71 | 0.824 | 45.7% | +42 | — | — | 30.0% | -1.00 | 2–2 (50%) | 0–1 | — | +0.10 |
| 25 | 2019 | 1717 | 138.4 | -0.18 | -0.13 | 0.953 | 49.3% | -18 | -87 | -80 | 51.3% | -0.12 | 5–7 (42%) | 6–4 (60%) | 101.1 | -1.21 | 2019 | 1734 | 133.2 | -0.71 | -1.22 | 0.932 | 48.8% | -2 | -166 | -55 | 43.2% | -0.39 | 3–1 (75%) | 1–2 (33%) | 103.3 | -0.90 |
| 26 | 2020 | 1813 | 147.3 | +3.14 | +1.35 | 1.131 | 52.7% | -60 | -109 | — | 60.0% | +0.85 | 4–4 (50%) | 0–1 | — | -1.27 | 2020 | 1623 | 118.4 | -2.04 | -0.34 | 0.923 | 48.3% | +39 | — | — | 40.6% | -0.75 | 1–3 (25%) | 2–2 (50%) | 96.2 | -0.17 |
| 27 | 2021 | 1891 | 152.7 | +3.13 | +2.70 | 1.158 | 53.3% | +4 | -43 | — | 71.3% | +1.40 | 9–5 (64%) | 7–3 (70%) | 107.5 | +0.72 | 2021 | 1646 | 122.0 | -1.24 | -0.82 | 0.936 | 48.4% | -3 | -115 | +89 | 42.6% | -0.66 | 5–4 (56%) | 1–3 (25%) | 101.0 | -0.59 |
| 28 | 2022 | 1898 | 149.2 | +2.47 | +2.92 | 1.117 | 52.3% | +79 | -119 | — | 66.2% | +0.81 | 3–5 (38%) | 6–3 (67%) | 99.8 | +0.10 | 2022 | 1715 | 129.3 | -1.29 | -0.08 | 0.947 | 48.7% | -7 | -84 | -9 | 42.4% | -0.62 | 4–4 (50%) | 4–6 (40%) | 99.0 | -1.24 |
| 29 | 2023 | 1855 | 153.7 | +2.52 | +1.03 | 1.025 | 50.4% | +53 | — | — | 53.6% | +0.20 | 5–9 (36%) | 5–7 (42%) | 91.8 | -2.00 | 2023 | 1682 | 126.0 | -1.26 | -0.82 | 0.950 | 48.9% | +20 | -11 | -71 | 50.7% | -0.24 | 5–8 (38%) | 6–0 (100%) | 100.9 | -0.58 |
| 30 | 2024 | 1951 | 160.8 | +3.69 | +3.10 | 1.157 | 53.2% | -11 | +71 | -239 | 68.1% | +1.30 | 9–7 (56%) | 7–1 (88%) | 104.9 | -1.22 | 2024 | 1625 | 96.9 | -3.79 | -3.39 | 0.631 | 39.9% | — | — | — | 9.1% | -3.18 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | -0.30 |
| 31 | 2025 | 1860 | 143.1 | +1.81 | -0.05 | 1.019 | 50.4% | -7 | +142 | -159 | 50.7% | +0.09 | 5–4 (56%) | 4–3 (57%) | 100.4 | -0.97 | 2025 | 1593 | 110.2 | -1.83 | -2.46 | 0.794 | 44.6% | +38 | — | — | 33.3% | -1.42 | 2–0 | — | — | 0.00 |
| Career | — | 2074 | 154.6 | +2.01 | +1.46 | 1.057 | 51.3% | +14 | -3 | -124 | 59.0% | +0.55 | 49–46 (52%) | 38–24 (61%) | 107.7 | -1.76 | — | 1838 | 128.2 | -1.76 | -0.15 | 0.925 | 48.3% | +20 | -77 | +9 | 43.9% | -0.54 | 53–48 (52%) | 39–29 (57%) | 108.1 | -1.56 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Lauren Davis
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sloane Stephens | 3 | 3 | 6 | Aug 23, 2023 | H2H |
| Danka Kovinic | 3 | 2 | 5 | Aug 30, 2023 | H2H |
| Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova | 2 | 3 | 5 | May 26, 2023 | H2H |
| Jelena Ostapenko | 2 | 3 | 5 | Oct 19, 2022 | H2H |
| Madison Keys | 1 | 4 | 5 | Jun 23, 2022 | H2H |