H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Danielle Collins vs Monica Puig H2H: 2-2
Danielle Collins and Monica Puig are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Danielle Collins won the 2022 Madrid second round 7-5 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 32
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
PUR
Age 32
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 30, 2022* | Madrid | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Danielle Collins | 7-5 6-0 | Monica Puig | Match data |
| Apr 6, 2019* | Charleston | WTA 500 | QF | Clay | Monica Puig | 6-3 6-2 | Danielle Collins | Match data |
| Mar 23, 2018* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R16 | Hard | Danielle Collins | 3-6 6-4 6-2 | Monica Puig | Match data |
| Mar 10, 2017* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Monica Puig | 6-0 6-2 | Danielle Collins | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Danielle Collins | #343 | #7 | 3,702 | 2,073 | 169 | 115 | 59.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| Monica Puig | #1,073 | #27 | 1,570 | 1,838 | 128 | 136 | 48.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Danielle Collins | Monica Puig | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #211 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #124 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #56 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #915 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #59 | 1,616 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #92 | 1,579 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #259 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #32 | 1,713 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #177 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #58 | 1,709 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2018 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #36 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 18–14 | 56.2% | #53 | 1,775 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2019 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #29 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #79 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2020 | 10–6 | 62.5% | #45 | 1,811 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #105 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2021 | 37–15 | 71.2% | #29 | 1,889 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2022 | 20–11 | 64.5% | #14 | 1,894 | 0 | 2 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1073 | 1,625 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2023 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #52 | 1,853 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2024 | 35–15 | 70.0% | #11 | 1,937 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2025 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #64 | 1,855 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |