H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Danka Kovinic vs Shuai Peng H2H: 0-2

Shuai Peng holds a 2–0 lead over Danka Kovinic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Shuai Peng leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Shuai Peng won the 2017 Miami Open first round 6-2 0-0 RET.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Danka Kovinic
Montenegro Age 31 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
Shuai Peng
CHN Age 40 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Shuai Peng #43 6-2 0-0 (ret.) Danka Kovinic #78 Match data Mar 23, 2017* R128 Miami Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Shuai Peng #182 3-6 7-5 6-3 Danka Kovinic #63 Match data Oct 15, 2016* SF Tianjin International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Danka Kovinic #1,327 #46 1,312 1,755 85 124 40.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Shuai Peng #820 #14 2,825 1,907 301 263 53.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Danka Kovinic Shuai Peng
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 2001 0–1 0.0% #518 1,493 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 2002 0–1 0.0% #366 1,484 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2003 0–2 0.0% #221 1,455 0 0
18 2013 2–2 50.0% #168 1,511 0 0 2004 5–4 55.6% #80 1,516 0 0
19 2014 6–12 33.3% #109 1,458 0 0 2005 20–16 55.6% #36 1,680 0 0
20 2015 16–13 55.2% #57 1,611 0 0 2006 18–17 51.4% #55 1,729 0 0
21 2016 18–23 43.9% #71 1,571 0 0 2007 19–17 52.8% #45 1,738 0 0
22 2017 3–16 15.8% #121 1,452 0 0 2008 25–23 52.1% #40 1,707 0 0
23 2018 3–5 37.5% #154 1,517 0 0 2009 23–22 51.1% #46 1,773 0 0
24 2019 2–3 40.0% #85 1,566 0 0 2010 15–13 53.6% #72 1,760 0 0
25 2020 5–7 41.7% #77 1,633 0 0 2011 48–23 67.6% #17 1,840 0 0
26 2021 12–17 41.4% #96 1,586 0 0 2012 22–23 48.9% #40 1,707 0 0
27 2022 9–11 45.0% #60 1,685 0 0 2013 18–18 50.0% #42 1,656 0 0
28 2023 8–11 42.1% #150 1,628 0 0 2014 28–22 56.0% #21 1,746 0 0
29 2024 0–1 0.0% #1327 1,621 0 0 2015 6–7 46.2% #137 1,701 0 0
30 2025 1–1 50.0% — 1,608 0 0 2016 8–11 42.1% #84 1,660 0 1
31 2026 0–2 0.0% #1327 1,542 0 0 2017 36–22 62.1% #27 1,794 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2018 1–9 10.0% #125 1,723 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2019 7–9 43.8% #109 1,670 0 2
34 — — — — — — — 2020 2–3 40.0% #117 1,627 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Danka Kovinic Shuai Peng
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2013 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — 2004 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
19 2014 3 8 11 27.3% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — 2005 13 9 22 59.1% 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 2015 5 5 10 50.0% 11 7 18 61.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2006 6 9 15 40.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
21 2016 8 14 22 36.4% 10 7 17 58.8% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2007 14 13 27 51.9% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 2017 2 10 12 16.7% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2008 19 16 35 54.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2018 1 1 2 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2009 17 14 31 54.8% 5 7 12 41.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
24 2019 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 6 8 14 42.9% 9 5 14 64.3% — — — — — — — —
25 2020 1 4 5 20.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — 2011 32 15 47 68.1% 10 5 15 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — —
26 2021 3 11 14 21.4% 9 5 14 64.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2012 16 16 32 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
27 2022 4 7 11 36.4% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2013 10 12 22 45.5% 7 5 12 58.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
28 2023 5 7 12 41.7% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — 2014 19 13 32 59.4% 6 7 13 46.2% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
29 2024 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2015 6 5 11 54.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 2025 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 8 7 15 53.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
31 2026 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2017 29 16 45 64.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 0 4 4 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 7 9 16 43.8% — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 35 72 107 32.7% 50 46 96 52.1% 0 6 6 0.0% — — — — — 209 176 385 54.3% 68 64 132 51.5% 24 21 45 53.3% 0 2 2 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 188/207 of Danka Kovinic's and 451/553 of Shuai Peng's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Danka Kovinic Shuai Peng
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2013 2/4 5.0 5.5 55.0% 57.3% 52.0% 65.2% 50.0% 55.9% 45.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2014 14/18 3.7 5.7 51.1% 67.8% 44.2% 54.0% 43.4% 56.2% 40.3% 2005 5/36 2.6 2.6 61.4% 60.8% 37.6% 50.9% 53.6% 53.2% 54.0%
20 2015 20/29 4.3 4.0 56.8% 65.8% 53.1% 48.2% 46.4% 60.0% 38.8% 2006 19/35 2.0 2.5 64.1% 56.9% 41.5% 48.6% 49.0% 51.0% 42.0%
21 2016 38/41 3.0 3.7 52.2% 65.7% 48.0% 54.6% 50.3% 57.6% 41.9% 2007 30/36 2.7 1.5 65.5% 61.9% 52.3% 56.6% 43.5% 58.3% 45.5%
22 2017 19/19 3.5 4.1 53.8% 59.7% 40.7% 52.5% 41.1% 51.0% 39.9% 2008 34/48 2.1 2.1 68.0% 60.8% 48.5% 49.1% 48.0% 56.8% 47.4%
23 2018 8/8 1.9 3.8 54.9% 62.5% 40.5% 42.1% 40.9% 52.7% 39.4% 2009 42/45 1.6 1.9 67.7% 60.9% 47.4% 48.7% 47.7% 56.5% 44.5%
24 2019 5/5 2.4 7.4 59.7% 60.2% 42.0% 55.2% 63.4% 52.9% 43.8% 2010 24/28 1.0 1.7 70.1% 61.3% 50.6% 44.9% 43.8% 58.0% 44.3%
25 2020 12/12 3.0 5.0 58.4% 69.7% 41.9% 54.5% 47.4% 59.0% 39.8% 2011 65/71 2.3 1.8 68.3% 66.5% 48.1% 53.5% 47.4% 60.5% 45.7%
26 2021 29/30 2.4 4.6 52.5% 59.1% 43.8% 43.4% 54.5% 51.8% 41.9% 2012 40/45 2.8 2.3 66.8% 64.1% 47.3% 44.4% 52.1% 58.4% 42.4%
27 2022 20/20 3.0 4.9 51.6% 62.2% 41.5% 52.7% 46.6% 52.1% 39.4% 2013 35/36 2.1 2.6 65.1% 62.3% 44.6% 52.6% 47.6% 55.9% 44.7%
28 2023 19/19 3.5 4.6 57.7% 64.5% 42.4% 50.2% 54.5% 54.6% 43.3% 2014 43/50 2.7 2.4 63.3% 64.2% 46.5% 53.4% 53.6% 57.5% 42.3%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 13/13 3.0 3.2 63.2% 59.9% 44.5% 44.8% 38.1% 54.2% 41.2%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 14/21 2.0 1.8 61.4% 60.2% 45.4% 54.0% 45.8% 54.7% 36.8%
31 2026 2/2 1.0 5.5 59.9% 45.3% 25.1% 12.5% 54.8% 37.4% 42.0% 2017 57/58 1.7 2.2 63.7% 63.7% 47.7% 55.3% 49.4% 57.8% 47.0%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 9/10 1.8 2.9 63.8% 60.8% 46.5% 57.7% 47.4% 56.2% 33.5%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 16/16 1.6 2.1 67.6% 62.3% 44.1% 51.6% 41.3% 56.1% 43.6%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 5/5 1.2 1.4 71.8% 63.2% 52.9% 53.4% 56.9% 60.0% 43.9%
Career — 188/210 3.1 4.5 54.1% 63.4% 44.5% 50.4% 48.9% 54.8% 40.9% — 451/566 2.1 2.1 66.0% 62.7% 47.2% 51.4% 48.0% 57.3% 44.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Danka Kovinic Shuai Peng
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1494 102.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.19
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1485 102.4 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 — — -0.02
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1455 96.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.25 — — — +0.22
18 2013 1512 105.6 -0.09 -0.79 1.028 50.4% — +61 — 45.5% +0.18 2–1 (67%) 0–1 — +0.28 2004 1516 114.6 — — — — +25 — — 50.0% +0.60 2–0 — — +0.25
19 2014 1459 99.7 -1.02 -2.74 0.921 48.4% -5 +95 — 38.6% -0.52 3–5 (38%) 1–5 (17%) 94.1 +1.27 2005 1680 142.9 -0.36 +4.21 1.154 53.6% -27 -58 — 56.8% +0.53 2–6 (25%) 3–5 (38%) 95.0 +0.12
20 2015 1611 119.5 +1.23 -1.90 0.970 49.1% -90 +28 — 52.3% +0.22 7–4 (64%) 1–2 (33%) 105.0 -0.31 2006 1729 119.5 -2.95 -1.68 0.858 46.7% -74 -31 -96 53.5% -0.15 5–4 (56%) 2–1 (67%) 103.6 -0.81
21 2016 1571 121.1 +1.05 -0.55 0.987 49.9% -60 +117 — 46.2% -0.26 3–6 (33%) 4–3 (57%) 99.4 -0.03 2007 1738 140.7 +2.26 +2.00 1.092 51.8% -34 +14 — 53.2% +0.52 5–6 (45%) 2–3 (40%) 98.4 -0.16
22 2017 1453 98.5 -3.39 -2.67 0.813 45.8% +3 +129 — 18.4% -1.58 1–3 (25%) 0–8 (0%) 91.9 +0.40 2008 1707 128.9 +0.94 +2.05 1.097 52.0% -3 -20 -79 53.3% +0.38 4–11 (27%) 7–3 (70%) 97.0 +1.57
23 2018 1518 106.0 -1.79 -2.54 0.832 45.9% — +59 — 36.8% -1.32 2–1 (67%) 1–0 — +0.15 2009 1773 142.5 +1.21 +1.78 1.022 50.6% +16 -138 — 52.0% +0.22 7–9 (44%) 6–3 (67%) 101.4 -1.70
24 2019 1566 103.9 -0.76 -0.72 0.932 49.2% -43 — — 46.2% -0.08 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — +0.20 2010 1760 128.8 +1.83 +0.38 1.056 51.1% +2 -76 — 51.6% +0.14 7–7 (50%) 2–3 (40%) 97.6 -1.67
25 2020 1633 123.6 +1.55 -0.81 0.969 49.6% -122 +85 — 46.4% -0.29 1–3 (25%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.18 2011 1840 146.6 +4.59 +2.04 1.157 53.1% +11 -74 -116 64.2% +1.13 18–8 (69%) 7–9 (44%) 105.6 +1.38
26 2021 1587 117.6 -3.32 -0.37 0.869 46.9% -131 +176 — 41.0% -0.95 4–1 (80%) 2–1 (67%) 104.6 -1.02 2012 1708 129.2 +1.71 -0.73 1.018 50.2% +13 +6 +50 52.0% +0.11 8–8 (50%) 5–5 (50%) 96.7 +1.22
27 2022 1686 120.8 -2.62 -1.70 0.821 46.1% -179 +154 — 40.4% -0.91 6–1 (86%) 0–3 (0%) 105.3 -0.27 2013 1656 128.2 +0.33 +0.95 1.015 50.5% -3 +77 — 50.6% +0.07 7–5 (58%) 3–3 (50%) 99.6 -0.24
28 2023 1628 123.5 -2.04 -0.40 0.953 49.1% -99 +136 — 46.2% -0.03 3–2 (60%) 0–1 — -0.17 2014 1747 135.0 +1.13 -0.79 0.996 50.1% -12 -53 +25 57.1% +0.46 7–6 (54%) 5–6 (45%) 99.7 +0.27
29 2024 1621 98.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.50 — — — -0.08 2015 1701 126.5 -2.49 +0.54 0.900 47.6% +36 — — 53.6% -0.04 1–3 (25%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.02
30 2025 1609 100.3 — — — — — — — 50.0% -1.50 — — — +0.25 2016 1660 114.8 +0.32 -3.37 0.812 46.4% +54 — +28 41.5% -0.78 2–5 (29%) 3–4 (43%) 95.6 +0.09
31 2026 1542 98.8 -1.17 -0.84 0.671 39.7% — — — 0.0% -3.75 — — — 0.00 2017 1794 144.9 +1.43 +3.25 1.114 52.3% +9 -153 -47 59.8% +0.67 9–7 (56%) 9–6 (60%) 102.1 -1.14
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1724 109.2 -0.92 -4.14 0.764 45.6% +31 -67 — 21.7% -1.91 0–3 (0%) — — -0.14
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1670 122.1 -0.89 +0.34 0.993 49.8% +20 — — 51.4% -0.34 1–4 (20%) 4–1 (80%) 97.5 +0.01
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1627 111.9 +1.00 -0.04 1.097 52.2% +20 — — 41.7% 0.00 1–1 0–2 — +0.30
Career — 1756 118.4 -1.08 -1.26 0.906 48.0% -79 +104 — 41.8% -0.55 33–29 (53%) 11–26 (30%) 99.6 +0.24 — 1908 141.0 +1.33 +0.93 1.037 50.8% +2 -48 -41 53.9% +0.30 86–94 (48%) 60–55 (52%) 98.4 -0.11

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.