H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 22:30 UTC
Danka Kovinic vs Sílvia Soler-Espinosa H2H: 1-1
Danka Kovinic and Sílvia Soler-Espinosa are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Danka Kovinic leads 1–0 on clay, while Sílvia Soler-Espinosa leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Danka Kovinic won the 2016 Rio de Janeiro fourth round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
MNE
Age 31
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 38
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 18, 2016 | Rio de Janeiro | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Danka Kovinic | 6-2 6-3 | Sílvia Soler-Espinosa | Match data |
| Jul 24, 2014* | Baku | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Sílvia Soler-Espinosa | 6-2 6-4 | Danka Kovinic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Danka Kovinic | #1,327 | #46 | 1,312 | 1,755 | 85 | 121 | 41.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sílvia Soler-Espinosa | #858 | #54 | 1,157 | 1,643 | 56 | 102 | 35.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Danka Kovinic | Sílvia Soler-Espinosa | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2013 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #168 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2014 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #109 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2015 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #57 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2016 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #71 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #183 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2017 | 3–16 | 15.8% | #121 | 1,454 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #167 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2018 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #154 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #81 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2019 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #85 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #83 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2020 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #77 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #82 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2021 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #96 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #66 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2022 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #60 | 1,687 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #145 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2023 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #150 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #128 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #225 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #190 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1327 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #681 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |