H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Daria Kasatkina vs Alison Riske-Amritraj H2H: 1-1
Daria Kasatkina and Alison Riske-Amritraj are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Daria Kasatkina won the 2017 Wuhan second round 6-1 2-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 29
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 36
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 26, 2017* | Wuhan | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Daria Kasatkina | 6-1 2-6 6-3 | Alison Riske-Amritraj | Match data |
| Oct 16, 2014* | Moscow | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Alison Riske-Amritraj | 6-1 6-2 | Daria Kasatkina | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daria Kasatkina | #63 | #8 | 3,525 | 1,988 | 316 | 224 | 58.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 8 |
| Alison Riske-Amritraj | #1,157 | #18 | 2,360 | 1,853 | 191 | 202 | 48.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Daria Kasatkina | Alison Riske-Amritraj | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #354 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2015 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #75 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2016 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #26 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #115 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2017 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #24 | 1,848 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #136 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2018 | 40–23 | 63.5% | #10 | 1,893 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #180 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2019 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #70 | 1,756 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 11–6 | 64.7% | #57 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2020 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #72 | 1,774 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #43 | 1,713 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2021 | 37–19 | 66.1% | #26 | 1,842 | 0 | 4 | 2015 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #97 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2022 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #8 | 1,908 | 0 | 6 | 2016 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #39 | 1,742 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2023 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #18 | 1,914 | 0 | 6 | 2017 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #70 | 1,650 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2024 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #9 | 1,929 | 0 | 8 | 2018 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #62 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2025 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #37 | 1,781 | 0 | 8 | 2019 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #18 | 1,797 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2026 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #63 | 1,779 | 0 | 8 | 2020 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #26 | 1,739 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #51 | 1,771 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #41 | 1,750 | 0 | 3 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 0–8 | 0.0% | #659 | 1,614 | 0 | 3 |