H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Daria Kasatkina vs Lesia Tsurenko H2H: 3-1
Daria Kasatkina holds a 3–1 lead over Lesia Tsurenko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Daria Kasatkina leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Daria Kasatkina won the 2023 Madrid third round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 29
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
UKR
Age 37
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 30, 2023* | Madrid | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Daria Kasatkina | 6-4 6-2 | Lesia Tsurenko | Match data |
| Oct 17, 2018* | Moscow | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Daria Kasatkina | 6-4 7-6(1) | Lesia Tsurenko | Match data |
| Sep 25, 2018* | Wuhan | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Daria Kasatkina | 6-4 7-5 | Lesia Tsurenko | Match data |
| Jun 22, 2018* | Birmingham | WTA 500 | R16 | Grass | Lesia Tsurenko | 1-6 6-3 6-3 | Daria Kasatkina | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daria Kasatkina | #63 | #8 | 3,525 | 1,988 | 316 | 224 | 58.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 8 |
| Lesia Tsurenko | #370 | #23 | 2,030 | 1,889 | 180 | 200 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Daria Kasatkina | Lesia Tsurenko | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #354 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2015 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #75 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2016 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #26 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2017 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #24 | 1,848 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #284 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2018 | 40–23 | 63.5% | #10 | 1,893 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #155 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2019 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #70 | 1,756 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #113 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2020 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #72 | 1,774 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #116 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2021 | 37–19 | 66.1% | #26 | 1,842 | 0 | 4 | 2013 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #68 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2022 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #8 | 1,908 | 0 | 6 | 2014 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #92 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2023 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #18 | 1,914 | 0 | 6 | 2015 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #33 | 1,738 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2024 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #9 | 1,929 | 0 | 8 | 2016 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #57 | 1,728 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2025 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #37 | 1,781 | 0 | 8 | 2017 | 22–24 | 47.8% | #42 | 1,699 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2026 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #63 | 1,779 | 0 | 8 | 2018 | 26–18 | 59.1% | #27 | 1,814 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #73 | 1,734 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #146 | 1,746 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #118 | 1,738 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #137 | 1,745 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 24–15 | 61.5% | #31 | 1,866 | 0 | 4 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #115 | 1,693 | 0 | 4 |