H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:32 UTC
Daria Kasatkina vs Timea Babos H2H: 3-0
Daria Kasatkina holds a 3–0 lead over Timea Babos in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Daria Kasatkina leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Daria Kasatkina won the 2023 Zhengzhou third round 6-1 7-6(7).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 29
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
HUN
Age 33
Right-Handed
179 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 12, 2023* | Zhengzhou | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Daria Kasatkina | 6-1 7-6(7) | Timea Babos | Match data |
| Aug 29, 2018* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Daria Kasatkina | 6-4 5-7 6-4 | Timea Babos | Match data |
| Jan 10, 2017* | Sydney | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Daria Kasatkina | 3-6 6-4 6-2 | Timea Babos | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daria Kasatkina | #63 | #8 | 3,525 | 1,988 | 316 | 224 | 58.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 8 |
| Timea Babos | #453 | #25 | 1,675 | 1,768 | 123 | 177 | 41.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Daria Kasatkina | Timea Babos | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #354 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #268 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2015 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #75 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #154 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2016 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #26 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #67 | 1,553 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2017 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #24 | 1,848 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #88 | 1,540 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2018 | 40–23 | 63.5% | #10 | 1,893 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #99 | 1,482 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2019 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #70 | 1,756 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #70 | 1,564 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2020 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #72 | 1,774 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 35–27 | 56.5% | #28 | 1,712 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2021 | 37–19 | 66.1% | #26 | 1,842 | 0 | 4 | 2017 | 20–26 | 43.5% | #57 | 1,637 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2022 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #8 | 1,908 | 0 | 6 | 2018 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #59 | 1,614 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2023 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #18 | 1,914 | 0 | 6 | 2019 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #89 | 1,595 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2024 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #9 | 1,929 | 0 | 8 | 2020 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #115 | 1,542 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2025 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #37 | 1,781 | 0 | 8 | 2021 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #160 | 1,497 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2026 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #63 | 1,779 | 0 | 8 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #336 | 1,455 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #188 | 1,480 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #338 | 1,451 | 0 | 3 |