H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Daria Kasatkina vs Venus Williams H2H: 2-2

Daria Kasatkina and Venus Williams are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Daria Kasatkina leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Venus Williams leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Venus Williams won the 2019 Miami Open third round 6-3 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Daria Kasatkina
Australia Age 29 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main draw meetings
Venus Williams
United States Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Venus Williams #43 6-3 6-1 Daria Kasatkina #22 Match data Mar 24, 2019* R32 Miami Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Daria Kasatkina #19 4-6 6-4 7-5 Venus Williams #8 Match data Mar 17, 2018* SF Indian Wells Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Venus Williams #8 7-5 4-6 10-8 Daria Kasatkina #33 Match data Jul 3, 2016* R32 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Daria Kasatkina #75 6-7(4) 6-3 6-3 Venus Williams #7 Match data Jan 6, 2016* R32 ASB Classic International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS Olympics 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Daria Kasatkina #61 #8 3,525 1,990 324 231 58.4% 0 0 0 0 6 2 8
Venus Williams #469 #1 7,452 2,368 782 299 72.3% 7 1 9 2 19 11 49

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Daria Kasatkina Venus Williams
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1994 1–1 50.0% — 1,525 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1995 2–3 40.0% #205 1,561 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1996 2–5 28.6% #216 1,570 0 0
17 2014 0–1 0.0% #354 1,493 0 0 1997 20–13 60.6% #22 1,830 0 0
18 2015 7–5 58.3% #75 1,610 0 0 1998 51–13 79.7% #5 2,099 0 3
19 2016 32–21 60.4% #26 1,756 0 0 1999 57–12 82.6% #3 2,248 0 9
20 2017 31–21 59.6% #24 1,854 0 1 2000 41–4 91.1% #3 2,337 2 15
21 2018 42–24 63.6% #10 1,899 0 2 2001 46–6 88.5% #3 2,358 4 21
22 2019 13–21 38.2% #70 1,750 0 2 2002 63–9 87.5% #2 2,303 4 28
23 2020 8–12 40.0% #72 1,772 0 2 2003 24–5 82.8% #11 2,260 4 29
24 2021 37–19 66.1% #26 1,840 0 4 2004 42–14 75.0% #9 2,077 4 31
25 2022 41–22 65.1% #8 1,908 0 6 2005 34–10 77.3% #10 2,128 5 33
26 2023 41–25 62.1% #18 1,897 0 6 2006 13–6 68.4% #46 2,035 5 33
27 2024 42–23 64.6% #9 1,922 0 8 2007 46–10 82.1% #8 2,059 6 36
28 2025 19–21 47.5% #37 1,778 0 8 2008 40–11 78.4% #6 2,138 7 39
29 2026 11–16 40.7% #61 1,772 0 8 2009 38–16 70.4% #6 1,988 7 41
30 — — — — — — — 2010 38–7 84.4% #5 2,061 7 43
31 — — — — — — — 2011 8–4 66.7% #102 2,017 7 43
32 — — — — — — — 2012 24–9 72.7% #24 2,016 7 44
33 — — — — — — — 2013 15–11 57.7% #47 1,910 7 44
34 — — — — — — — 2014 33–15 68.8% #18 1,888 7 45
35 — — — — — — — 2015 39–14 73.6% #7 1,971 7 48
36 — — — — — — — 2016 24–15 61.5% #17 1,817 7 49
37 — — — — — — — 2017 38–15 71.7% #5 1,941 7 49
38 — — — — — — — 2018 15–11 57.7% #39 1,872 7 49
39 — — — — — — — 2019 20–15 57.1% #52 1,819 7 49
40 — — — — — — — 2020 1–8 11.1% #79 1,713 7 49
41 — — — — — — — 2021 3–9 25.0% #318 1,647 7 49
42 — — — — — — — 2022 0–4 0.0% #1000 1,602 7 49
43 — — — — — — — 2023 3–7 30.0% #412 1,592 7 49

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Daria Kasatkina Venus Williams
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 — — — — — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
17 2014 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 15 7 22 68.2% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0%
18 2015 5 2 7 71.4% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 1998 36 8 44 81.8% 9 2 11 81.8% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7%
19 2016 23 15 38 60.5% 7 4 11 63.6% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1999 34 6 40 85.0% 12 2 14 85.7% 4 1 5 80.0% 7 3 10 70.0%
20 2017 22 16 38 57.9% 8 4 12 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2000 25 0 25 100.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 7 0 7 100.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
21 2018 23 14 37 62.2% 12 7 19 63.2% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — 2001 32 3 35 91.4% 5 2 7 71.4% 7 0 7 100.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
22 2019 9 15 24 37.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2002 35 5 40 87.5% 14 2 16 87.5% 6 1 7 85.7% 8 1 9 88.9%
23 2020 5 9 14 35.7% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2003 8 2 10 80.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 6 1 7 85.7% 4 0 4 100.0%
24 2021 25 11 36 69.4% 5 5 10 50.0% 7 3 10 70.0% — — — — 2004 21 9 30 70.0% 17 2 19 89.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
25 2022 25 15 40 62.5% 12 5 17 70.6% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2005 18 7 25 72.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 7 0 7 100.0% — — — —
26 2023 23 16 39 59.0% 12 6 18 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — 2006 1 2 3 33.3% 10 3 13 76.9% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
27 2024 26 17 43 60.5% 8 4 12 66.7% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — — 2007 27 5 32 84.4% 12 5 17 70.6% 7 0 7 100.0% — — — —
28 2025 12 13 25 48.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2008 29 9 38 76.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 7 0 7 100.0% — — — —
29 2026 5 8 13 38.5% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2009 21 11 32 65.6% 11 4 15 73.3% 6 1 7 85.7% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 19 3 22 86.4% 15 3 18 83.3% 4 1 5 80.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 14 3 17 82.4% 8 4 12 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 12 8 20 60.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 27 11 38 71.1% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 34 10 44 77.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 14 11 25 56.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 5 1 6 83.3% — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 26 11 37 70.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 6 1 7 85.7% — — — —
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 12 7 19 63.2% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 16 11 27 59.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 2 4 6 33.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
Career — 203 152 355 57.2% 82 55 137 59.9% 39 24 63 61.9% — — — — — 487 189 676 72.0% 163 69 232 70.3% 98 27 125 78.4% 34 14 48 70.8%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 514/558 of Daria Kasatkina's and 581/732 of Venus Williams's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Daria Kasatkina Venus Williams
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 2014 1/1 1.0 3.0 53.3% 37.5% 38.1% 40.0% 20.0% 37.8% 44.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2015 6/12 1.5 1.7 69.5% 61.2% 54.3% 60.1% 36.4% 59.1% 40.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2016 44/53 2.0 3.2 62.9% 62.1% 47.3% 49.9% 51.8% 56.7% 46.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2017 52/52 1.4 2.9 67.8% 59.3% 47.2% 49.7% 47.9% 55.1% 46.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2018 61/66 1.4 4.6 68.6% 60.2% 43.5% 50.4% 52.4% 54.8% 48.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2019 32/34 1.0 6.4 64.8% 57.0% 37.9% 45.7% 48.4% 50.2% 45.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2020 20/20 1.0 4.3 69.2% 57.0% 38.5% 38.7% 48.0% 51.5% 47.3% 2003 11/29 3.8 5.8 55.2% 76.2% 43.8% 53.3% 47.0% 61.6% 51.3%
24 2021 55/57 2.0 3.4 64.6% 63.8% 42.4% 49.5% 49.3% 56.2% 47.3% 2004 13/56 4.1 4.5 59.4% 72.2% 46.7% 41.6% 50.5% 61.9% 50.1%
25 2022 61/63 1.4 3.9 68.5% 62.4% 40.7% 54.2% 53.1% 55.6% 48.8% 2005 18/44 2.9 4.2 64.4% 70.7% 45.1% 63.1% 52.0% 61.3% 50.1%
26 2023 64/66 1.0 3.5 75.4% 60.0% 40.4% 53.4% 51.5% 54.9% 48.3% 2006 16/19 3.1 4.3 62.7% 68.3% 47.0% 52.8% 45.6% 60.6% 48.5%
27 2024 63/65 1.7 5.0 65.8% 61.6% 42.0% 50.6% 51.9% 54.9% 47.7% 2007 53/56 3.6 5.3 59.4% 72.6% 46.6% 56.6% 51.8% 62.2% 48.6%
28 2025 29/40 1.8 5.7 67.4% 58.6% 40.0% 45.7% 49.9% 52.4% 47.4% 2008 43/51 4.3 4.3 61.6% 72.0% 48.4% 55.6% 48.9% 62.7% 47.0%
29 2026 26/29 2.1 6.8 70.4% 58.5% 38.4% 52.0% 53.6% 52.6% 46.5% 2009 48/54 5.4 4.7 57.3% 73.4% 49.9% 59.5% 51.4% 63.3% 46.1%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 44/45 4.6 4.5 56.7% 73.5% 46.9% 53.7% 49.0% 61.9% 47.4%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 9/12 6.0 2.8 64.4% 72.3% 51.7% 60.3% 45.5% 64.5% 45.7%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 28/33 4.5 4.8 53.9% 68.9% 47.8% 50.7% 50.7% 59.2% 46.0%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 23/26 2.8 4.6 56.9% 65.4% 43.4% 55.0% 50.8% 56.0% 47.2%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 44/48 4.7 4.4 55.7% 71.6% 46.0% 56.6% 53.0% 60.4% 46.7%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 35/53 4.6 2.9 58.6% 70.6% 49.7% 50.2% 48.0% 62.1% 45.0%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 37/39 3.1 3.9 61.5% 65.5% 48.1% 52.8% 52.7% 58.4% 46.8%
37 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 46/53 3.5 5.2 60.9% 69.2% 46.3% 59.1% 46.0% 60.2% 46.0%
38 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 26/26 2.1 4.9 60.5% 63.9% 46.4% 53.6% 51.3% 56.7% 43.8%
39 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 34/35 1.8 3.7 63.2% 63.3% 43.3% 54.0% 45.9% 56.0% 43.6%
40 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 9/9 3.2 7.0 58.3% 63.2% 42.3% 61.2% 45.9% 54.5% 41.2%
41 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 12/12 3.4 4.4 62.1% 60.7% 37.2% 48.3% 44.1% 51.7% 39.2%
42 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 4/4 3.3 8.5 56.5% 65.1% 31.3% 49.0% 29.6% 50.4% 34.9%
43 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 10/10 3.6 4.4 60.1% 64.2% 38.7% 43.3% 39.2% 54.0% 40.5%
44 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 2/2 4.5 8.0 59.1% 60.9% 29.6% 49.4% 70.0% 47.9% 40.9%
45 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2025 4/4 3.5 5.5 54.2% 62.5% 31.3% 31.2% 48.2% 48.5% 40.7%
46 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2026 12/12 3.0 4.4 59.2% 63.3% 37.8% 46.5% 43.3% 53.3% 37.0%
Career — 514/558 1.5 4.2 67.9% 60.5% 42.3% 50.2% 50.7% 54.6% 47.3% — 581/1,081 3.8 4.5 59.3% 69.4% 46.1% 54.4% 49.2% 59.8% 46.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Daria Kasatkina Venus Williams
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1526 122.1 — — — — — — — 60.0% 0.00 0–1 — — -0.18
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1561 123.9 — — — — +29 — — 36.4% -0.36 1–0 0–1 — -0.31
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1570 134.2 — — — — +31 — — 46.7% +0.47 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — -0.34
17 2014 1493 98.5 -1.86 +0.28 0.718 42.3% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.02 1997 1831 160.2 — — — — +5 -255 -230 55.8% +0.44 8–5 (62%) 4–3 (57%) — -1.92
18 2015 1610 124.4 +0.87 -0.47 0.987 49.7% -8 -55 — 53.3% +0.27 4–2 (67%) 0–1 — -0.31 1998 2100 174.0 — — — — +4 -331 -385 75.6% +2.04 9–4 (69%) 4–3 (57%) — -0.82
19 2016 1757 143.6 +0.17 +2.83 1.067 51.4% +1 -113 -136 59.1% +0.59 10–11 (48%) 4–3 (57%) — +0.78 1999 2248 179.2 — — — — +7 -300 -461 77.5% +1.83 10–5 (67%) 9–4 (69%) — -4.08
20 2017 1854 147.3 -0.65 +3.33 1.039 50.8% -11 -98 — 56.9% +0.46 10–4 (71%) 6–8 (43%) — -1.06 2000 2337 171.5 — — — — +16 -397 -317 84.0% +2.34 8–2 (80%) 6–3 (67%) — -2.30
21 2018 1899 148.7 -0.84 +5.02 1.065 51.3% +7 -85 -146 59.2% +0.56 16–8 (67%) 10–6 (63%) — -0.04 2001 2358 172.4 — — — — +31 -379 -127 83.8% +2.48 8–1 (89%) 10–3 (77%) — -1.53
22 2019 1751 134.0 -4.36 +2.17 0.902 47.6% +23 +51 — 39.5% -1.00 4–6 (40%) 4–3 (57%) — -0.32 2002 2303 175.2 — — — — +58 -205 -10 81.3% +2.44 12–4 (75%) 7–3 (70%) — -2.34
23 2020 1773 138.1 -3.24 +3.53 0.976 49.3% -2 +29 — 43.5% -0.20 4–4 (50%) 0–1 — -0.90 2003 2261 155.8 +4.06 +5.13 1.337 56.1% +107 -163 +33 81.0% +2.37 4–3 (57%) 1–2 (33%) — -1.73
24 2021 1841 146.0 -0.32 +4.02 1.081 51.6% +12 -66 0 57.7% +0.68 17–7 (71%) 4–2 (67%) — -0.91 2004 2078 159.0 +4.27 +3.93 1.315 55.7% +59 +131 — 75.7% +1.99 6–3 (67%) 8–6 (57%) — +0.68
25 2022 1909 153.6 -0.53 +5.97 1.100 52.2% -25 +15 -53 59.0% +0.80 13–6 (68%) 4–8 (33%) — -1.84 2005 2128 165.4 +4.52 +4.90 1.293 55.5% +29 +38 +223 75.0% +2.03 6–4 (60%) 7–2 (78%) — -2.36
26 2023 1897 149.9 -1.19 +5.38 1.072 51.5% -7 +43 +22 58.3% +0.45 10–8 (56%) 7–8 (47%) — +2.71 2006 2035 136.6 +3.30 +3.85 1.231 54.0% +67 +87 +280 63.8% +0.94 5–4 (56%) 3–2 (60%) — -0.08
27 2024 1923 147.4 -1.36 +4.68 1.058 51.2% -35 +3 +127 56.6% +0.36 17–8 (68%) 7–6 (54%) — +1.03 2007 2059 153.9 +5.55 +3.98 1.286 55.2% +31 +23 +331 79.0% +2.10 6–6 (50%) 6–5 (55%) — -1.59
28 2025 1778 144.5 -3.29 +3.13 0.996 49.8% +8 +91 +197 50.0% +0.31 5–9 (36%) 1–4 (20%) — +2.04 2008 2138 163.5 +7.00 +3.95 1.260 54.6% -5 -109 +293 74.6% +1.81 7–5 (58%) 5–6 (45%) — -1.46
29 2026 1772 133.6 -2.93 +3.22 0.982 49.7% -3 +128 +66 47.1% -0.19 4–10 (29%) 4–7 (36%) — +0.20 2009 1989 162.7 +7.24 +2.88 1.255 54.5% +47 -3 +361 65.1% +1.53 13–10 (57%) 3–12 (20%) — -2.55
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 2062 156.7 +5.33 +3.88 1.244 54.7% +31 -11 +294 79.6% +1.80 6–2 (75%) 5–2 (71%) — +0.82
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 2018 120.4 +4.82 +1.85 1.287 54.7% +52 — +278 70.8% +1.58 3–1 (75%) 0–2 — +0.19
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 2016 150.4 +3.65 +3.04 1.127 52.6% +82 +19 +154 65.4% +1.15 9–3 (75%) 5–5 (50%) — -1.94
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1911 141.0 +0.75 +3.14 1.071 51.5% +85 +50 — 58.1% +0.65 6–6 (50%) 2–4 (33%) — -0.63
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1888 149.7 +4.15 +2.82 1.178 53.5% +57 +2 +268 66.4% +1.21 10–11 (48%) 5–6 (45%) — +0.59
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1971 157.4 +3.80 +3.44 1.187 53.2% +43 -131 +141 67.2% +1.27 13–4 (76%) 10–5 (67%) — -0.59
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1818 133.2 +2.07 +3.27 1.126 52.8% +13 +15 +295 62.0% +0.67 5–9 (36%) 11–4 (73%) — +1.30
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1941 149.8 +3.48 +3.27 1.155 53.0% -13 -79 +233 67.8% +1.01 11–6 (65%) 11–3 (79%) — -0.36
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1873 141.1 +0.84 +1.05 1.013 50.4% +44 -80 +237 54.0% +0.33 7–4 (64%) 3–3 (50%) — +0.67
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1820 145.6 +0.36 +1.07 0.992 50.0% +35 -40 +249 51.9% +0.05 9–4 (69%) 6–3 (67%) — -1.42
40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1714 126.0 +0.01 -0.68 0.905 48.2% +47 — — 27.3% -1.14 0–4 (0%) 0–3 (0%) — -1.11
41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1647 111.7 -2.68 -2.16 0.811 45.9% +79 -9 — 29.6% -1.59 1–2 (33%) 0–2 — -0.85
42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1602 107.5 -2.82 -1.21 0.703 43.0% +66 — — 11.1% -2.78 0–1 0–1 — 0.00
43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1593 114.1 -1.10 -0.46 0.880 47.2% +55 — +447 40.0% -1.00 1–4 (20%) 3–1 (75%) — -0.01
Career — 1990 151.3 -1.29 +4.16 1.043 50.9% -5 -9 +8 55.1% +0.36 114–83 (58%) 51–57 (47%) 100.7 +0.25 — 2369 167.3 +3.54 +2.76 1.146 52.9% +33 -76 +111 68.9% +1.40 185–126 (59%) 137–101 (58%) 99.1 -2.44

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.