H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Darja Vidmanova vs Shuai Zhang
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Darja Vidmanova vs Shuai Zhang.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 23
H2H
0
–
0
0 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No head-to-head meetings found. | ||||||||
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Darja Vidmanova | — | — | — | 1,527 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Shuai Zhang | #54 | #22 | 1,905 | 1,856 | 225 | 288 | 43.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Darja Vidmanova | Shuai Zhang | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #203 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #149 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #235 | 1,412 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #154 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #90 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 8–22 | 26.7% | #126 | 1,443 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #127 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 9–4 | 69.2% | #52 | 1,599 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #61 | 1,602 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #139 | 1,519 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #23 | 1,722 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #36 | 1,762 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #40 | 1,726 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #40 | 1,680 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 12–10 | 54.5% | #35 | 1,731 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #60 | 1,632 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 34–26 | 56.7% | #25 | 1,732 | 0 | 3 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 4–18 | 18.2% | #245 | 1,525 | 0 | 3 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #205 | 1,576 | 0 | 3 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #81 | 1,731 | 0 | 3 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #54 | 1,714 | 0 | 3 |