Dayana Yastremska
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jasmine Paolini | 1 | 6 | 7 | May 25, 2026 | H2H |
| Donna Vekic | 2 | 4 | 6 | Jul 7, 2024 | H2H |
| Shuai Zhang | 2 | 3 | 5 | Mar 5, 2026 | H2H |
| Magda Linette | 4 | 1 | 5 | Jun 21, 2025 | H2H |
| Ajla Tomljanovic | 3 | 1 | 4 | Jun 11, 2026 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC
Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova holds a 2–0 lead over Dayana Yastremska in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova won the 2025 US Open first round 6-7(5) 7-6(5) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova | 6-7(5) 7-6(5) 6-4 | Dayana Yastremska | Match data | Aug 25, 2025 | R128 | US Open | Grand Slam | Hard |
| Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova | 6-3 6-1 | Dayana Yastremska | Match data | Sep 19, 2019* | R32 | Pan Pacific Open | Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dayana Yastremska | #113 | #21 | 2,070 | 1,884 | 135 | 150 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova | #445 | #11 | 3,590 | 1,944 | 422 | 328 | 56.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 12 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Dayana Yastremska | Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #377 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #286 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #338 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #45 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2017 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #184 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 24–20 | 54.5% | #40 | 1,702 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2018 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #58 | 1,730 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #21 | 1,824 | 0 | 2 |
| 19 | 2019 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #22 | 1,822 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #16 | 1,813 | 0 | 3 |
| 20 | 2020 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #29 | 1,792 | 0 | 3 | 2012 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #36 | 1,712 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 2021 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #99 | 1,692 | 0 | 3 | 2013 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #26 | 1,798 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | 2022 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #101 | 1,614 | 0 | 3 | 2014 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #24 | 1,764 | 0 | 7 |
| 23 | 2023 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #102 | 1,669 | 0 | 3 | 2015 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #28 | 1,868 | 0 | 8 |
| 24 | 2024 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #33 | 1,648 | 0 | 3 | 2016 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #27 | 1,749 | 0 | 8 |
| 25 | 2025 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #27 | 1,816 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 41–23 | 64.1% | #15 | 1,832 | 0 | 11 |
| 26 | 2026 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #113 | 1,705 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,806 | 0 | 12 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 22–21 | 51.2% | #31 | 1,797 | 0 | 12 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #38 | 1,802 | 0 | 12 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #11 | 1,835 | 0 | 12 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #367 | 1,793 | 0 | 12 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #58 | 1,814 | 0 | 12 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #30 | 1,846 | 0 | 12 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #47 | 1,810 | 0 | 12 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #445 | 1,727 | 0 | 12 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Dayana Yastremska | Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2016 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2017 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 17 | 12 | 29 | 58.6% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 18 | 2018 | 9 | 6 | 15 | 60.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 31 | 14 | 45 | 68.9% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 19 | 2019 | 23 | 14 | 37 | 62.2% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 26 | 15 | 41 | 63.4% | 10 | 4 | 14 | 71.4% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2020 | 10 | 9 | 19 | 52.6% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 11 | 14 | 25 | 44.0% | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2021 | 5 | 11 | 16 | 31.3% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 26 | 16 | 42 | 61.9% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 22 | 2022 | 7 | 10 | 17 | 41.2% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 16 | 13 | 29 | 55.2% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 5 | 0 | 5 | 100.0% |
| 23 | 2023 | 4 | 10 | 14 | 28.6% | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 29 | 14 | 43 | 67.4% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2024 | 8 | 13 | 21 | 38.1% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 18 | 18 | 36 | 50.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2025 | 12 | 13 | 25 | 48.0% | 10 | 6 | 16 | 62.5% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 31 | 17 | 48 | 64.6% | 8 | 3 | 11 | 72.7% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2026 | 6 | 12 | 18 | 33.3% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 12 | 14 | 26 | 46.2% | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 21 | 16 | 37 | 56.8% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 15 | 14 | 29 | 51.7% | 10 | 3 | 13 | 76.9% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 21 | 13 | 34 | 61.8% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 4 | 1 | 5 | 80.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 84 | 99 | 183 | 45.9% | 34 | 36 | 70 | 48.6% | 17 | 15 | 32 | 53.1% | — | — | — | — | — | 298 | 220 | 518 | 57.5% | 90 | 74 | 164 | 54.9% | 27 | 30 | 57 | 47.4% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 265/286 of Dayana Yastremska's and 675/751 of Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Dayana Yastremska | Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 14 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 1/1 | 2.0 | 4.0 | 52.9% | 63.0% | 41.7% | 42.9% | 50.0% | 52.9% | 33.3% |
| 15 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1/1 | 0.0 | 3.0 | 55.6% | 30.0% | 25.0% | 25.0% | — | 27.8% | 14.3% |
| 16 | 2016 | 2/2 | 2.5 | 6.0 | 56.2% | 65.3% | 38.9% | 52.3% | 24.3% | 53.0% | 40.3% | 2008 | 14/18 | 1.9 | 3.1 | 57.9% | 64.6% | 45.1% | 37.4% | 48.4% | 56.5% | 45.9% |
| 17 | 2017 | 4/4 | 1.5 | 3.5 | 66.0% | 50.4% | 54.9% | 55.8% | 51.8% | 52.1% | 49.7% | 2009 | 43/44 | 2.0 | 5.1 | 58.9% | 64.8% | 43.9% | 52.3% | 46.7% | 56.0% | 44.0% |
| 18 | 2018 | 16/16 | 4.1 | 5.7 | 60.7% | 65.8% | 49.1% | 41.8% | 42.8% | 59.2% | 46.9% | 2010 | 54/60 | 2.6 | 5.3 | 59.2% | 64.8% | 45.4% | 54.3% | 46.6% | 56.8% | 46.4% |
| 19 | 2019 | 51/52 | 3.8 | 5.1 | 60.2% | 65.2% | 48.7% | 60.0% | 48.4% | 58.4% | 44.8% | 2011 | 55/58 | 3.0 | 6.1 | 60.1% | 67.0% | 46.1% | 50.9% | 53.5% | 58.3% | 46.3% |
| 20 | 2020 | 26/26 | 4.5 | 5.7 | 58.9% | 67.5% | 46.3% | 45.5% | 47.4% | 58.7% | 42.0% | 2012 | 40/44 | 2.4 | 5.6 | 59.2% | 64.5% | 41.9% | 50.5% | 46.8% | 55.0% | 42.7% |
| 21 | 2021 | 18/19 | 4.1 | 5.6 | 57.9% | 66.1% | 45.9% | 51.1% | 42.2% | 57.7% | 43.3% | 2013 | 47/55 | 2.9 | 5.4 | 56.6% | 68.7% | 46.2% | 52.4% | 48.3% | 59.1% | 44.5% |
| 22 | 2022 | 29/29 | 3.4 | 5.2 | 57.8% | 63.8% | 44.4% | 54.0% | 49.6% | 55.7% | 38.7% | 2014 | 38/46 | 3.9 | 7.4 | 56.4% | 69.2% | 39.6% | 55.3% | 52.4% | 56.4% | 42.7% |
| 23 | 2023 | 21/21 | 2.5 | 5.2 | 57.8% | 59.4% | 42.8% | 40.6% | 53.6% | 52.2% | 41.9% | 2015 | 38/55 | 2.3 | 5.4 | 65.0% | 65.0% | 49.8% | 53.2% | 46.1% | 59.4% | 40.5% |
| 24 | 2024 | 34/36 | 2.9 | 4.3 | 57.8% | 60.9% | 47.1% | 51.9% | 44.5% | 55.0% | 42.0% | 2016 | 42/51 | 2.8 | 4.0 | 62.7% | 65.6% | 43.7% | 49.9% | 53.7% | 57.3% | 45.0% |
| 25 | 2025 | 34/50 | 3.4 | 5.5 | 56.3% | 63.0% | 49.7% | 54.0% | 51.1% | 57.1% | 41.8% | 2017 | 64/64 | 3.0 | 4.5 | 62.3% | 65.3% | 46.2% | 57.3% | 45.7% | 58.2% | 45.1% |
| 26 | 2026 | 30/31 | 2.2 | 5.1 | 61.3% | 59.5% | 46.4% | 48.9% | 46.5% | 54.2% | 41.4% | 2018 | 40/42 | 2.6 | 4.3 | 65.0% | 66.1% | 43.9% | 53.5% | 44.9% | 58.5% | 42.8% |
| 27 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 43/43 | 2.3 | 4.7 | 62.3% | 64.5% | 43.4% | 52.8% | 52.7% | 56.5% | 44.2% |
| 28 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 17/17 | 2.6 | 4.9 | 68.4% | 63.0% | 42.0% | 43.8% | 46.7% | 56.8% | 44.8% |
| 29 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 40/46 | 2.5 | 3.5 | 67.9% | 64.9% | 45.5% | 51.1% | 50.1% | 58.6% | 44.6% |
| 30 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 5/5 | 1.6 | 4.0 | 76.0% | 63.4% | 43.9% | 59.5% | 62.2% | 57.8% | 47.5% |
| 31 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 26/26 | 3.0 | 4.8 | 62.0% | 65.2% | 45.9% | 57.5% | 47.3% | 57.1% | 45.2% |
| 32 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 44/45 | 3.3 | 4.0 | 61.4% | 66.7% | 49.9% | 53.6% | 49.7% | 60.5% | 43.2% |
| 33 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 18/24 | 3.3 | 4.9 | 60.8% | 65.5% | 42.7% | 48.1% | 49.6% | 56.0% | 39.6% |
| 34 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 5/6 | 2.8 | 5.0 | 55.8% | 63.4% | 35.4% | 43.7% | 16.8% | 51.0% | 34.4% |
| Career | — | 265/286 | 3.4 | 5.2 | 58.9% | 63.2% | 47.0% | 51.5% | 47.6% | 56.4% | 42.6% | — | 675/751 | 2.7 | 5.0 | 61.4% | 65.7% | 44.9% | 52.4% | 48.6% | 57.5% | 44.0% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Dayana Yastremska | Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 1497 | 106.7 | -0.12 | +2.94 | 0.708 | 42.6% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | -0.15 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1495 | 95.3 | -1.54 | +1.90 | 0.198 | 21.9% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -5.50 | — | — | — | -0.22 |
| 16 | 2016 | 1464 | 101.4 | -1.01 | -2.08 | 0.858 | 46.1% | — | — | — | 20.0% | -1.40 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.03 | 2008 | 1594 | 123.9 | +0.60 | +1.13 | 1.055 | 51.1% | -34 | -21 | +41 | 55.0% | +0.70 | 2–2 (50%) | 2–3 (40%) | 100.0 | -0.10 |
| 17 | 2017 | 1462 | 104.9 | -0.92 | +0.23 | 1.038 | 50.9% | — | +57 | — | 50.0% | +0.50 | 1–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.10 | 2009 | 1703 | 137.4 | +0.76 | +0.27 | 1.001 | 50.1% | +30 | -139 | -61 | 55.8% | +0.34 | 4–7 (36%) | 6–5 (55%) | 96.6 | +1.57 |
| 18 | 2018 | 1731 | 136.1 | +1.60 | +2.48 | 1.148 | 52.9% | +20 | — | — | 60.5% | +1.03 | 1–5 (17%) | 2–4 (33%) | 94.2 | -0.03 | 2010 | 1824 | 147.5 | +0.89 | +3.14 | 1.073 | 51.5% | +11 | -209 | -176 | 60.6% | +0.69 | 12–5 (71%) | 6–3 (67%) | 108.5 | -0.83 |
| 19 | 2019 | 1822 | 150.9 | +1.72 | +2.31 | 1.077 | 51.7% | +13 | -207 | -152 | 60.2% | +0.63 | 5–9 (36%) | 6–5 (55%) | 95.7 | -1.96 | 2011 | 1813 | 146.7 | +2.42 | +2.57 | 1.110 | 52.3% | -13 | -37 | -201 | 62.8% | +0.83 | 11–14 (44%) | 8–7 (53%) | 95.3 | -0.73 |
| 20 | 2020 | 1792 | 146.0 | +1.19 | -0.19 | 1.016 | 50.4% | +18 | -118 | — | 52.5% | +0.16 | 5–4 (56%) | 5–5 (50%) | 100.7 | -1.02 | 2012 | 1713 | 124.6 | -0.76 | -0.32 | 0.950 | 49.0% | -8 | +17 | -68 | 45.2% | -0.40 | 7–4 (64%) | 2–3 (40%) | 101.2 | +0.72 |
| 21 | 2021 | 1693 | 125.3 | +1.13 | -0.92 | 1.021 | 50.3% | -17 | -2 | — | 47.7% | 0.00 | 1–7 (13%) | 4–4 (50%) | 91.7 | -0.11 | 2013 | 1799 | 143.5 | +3.24 | +0.98 | 1.086 | 51.6% | +2 | -43 | — | 58.4% | +0.54 | 10–9 (53%) | 9–7 (56%) | 100.1 | -0.38 |
| 22 | 2022 | 1614 | 122.9 | -0.45 | -2.85 | 0.874 | 47.6% | +13 | +47 | +10 | 43.1% | -0.63 | 5–6 (45%) | 7–4 (64%) | 100.8 | -0.44 | 2014 | 1764 | 137.7 | +1.25 | -0.29 | 0.980 | 49.9% | +33 | -44 | -144 | 54.8% | +0.26 | 13–7 (65%) | 8–5 (62%) | 104.1 | +0.90 |
| 23 | 2023 | 1669 | 127.5 | -3.00 | -0.65 | 0.875 | 47.1% | +26 | -37 | — | 31.3% | -1.19 | 1–5 (17%) | 2–4 (33%) | 92.8 | +0.36 | 2015 | 1869 | 139.6 | +1.52 | -0.40 | 0.997 | 49.9% | +23 | -165 | -236 | 54.6% | +0.17 | 14–3 (82%) | 9–8 (53%) | 108.8 | -1.25 |
| 24 | 2024 | 1649 | 136.0 | -0.99 | -0.74 | 0.933 | 48.8% | 0 | +39 | 0 | 45.1% | -0.28 | 9–5 (64%) | 7–5 (58%) | 105.5 | +1.15 | 2016 | 1750 | 138.9 | +1.58 | +1.71 | 1.055 | 51.0% | -10 | -52 | -71 | 49.5% | +0.19 | 7–8 (47%) | 7–7 (50%) | 96.0 | -0.64 |
| 25 | 2025 | 1816 | 146.4 | +0.46 | -0.46 | 0.975 | 49.9% | -83 | -9 | -41 | 56.5% | +0.37 | 8–9 (47%) | 11–3 (79%) | 106.2 | -1.05 | 2017 | 1833 | 151.2 | +2.14 | +2.10 | 1.077 | 51.6% | +42 | -19 | -187 | 58.9% | +0.68 | 16–9 (64%) | 7–10 (41%) | 101.9 | -0.09 |
| 26 | 2026 | 1706 | 127.7 | -2.66 | -1.59 | 0.905 | 48.1% | -46 | +111 | +58 | 41.3% | -0.73 | 4–9 (31%) | 7–4 (64%) | 97.2 | +0.44 | 2018 | 1806 | 145.1 | +1.80 | +0.68 | 1.031 | 50.5% | +1 | +47 | -166 | 49.5% | +0.06 | 7–10 (41%) | 8–5 (62%) | 98.9 | -1.51 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 1797 | 148.1 | +0.11 | +1.68 | 1.017 | 50.5% | +27 | -20 | — | 51.5% | +0.15 | 7–10 (41%) | 5–3 (63%) | 96.0 | -0.49 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 1803 | 141.4 | +0.01 | +2.18 | 1.037 | 50.4% | +63 | -58 | — | 50.0% | +0.20 | 4–2 (67%) | 4–5 (44%) | 102.3 | -0.92 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1835 | 148.9 | +1.86 | +2.03 | 1.077 | 51.4% | -27 | +92 | -189 | 58.1% | +0.77 | 6–7 (46%) | 4–9 (31%) | 94.1 | -0.77 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 1793 | 111.4 | +0.38 | +1.45 | 1.125 | 52.8% | +16 | — | — | 53.8% | +0.69 | 0–3 (0%) | — | — | +0.51 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 1815 | 138.1 | +0.92 | +1.92 | 1.054 | 51.1% | -40 | +71 | — | 50.8% | +0.34 | 6–3 (67%) | 3–4 (43%) | 101.6 | -0.81 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 1846 | 155.5 | +3.69 | +0.67 | 1.095 | 51.8% | +87 | -44 | -230 | 56.0% | +0.51 | 6–8 (43%) | 7–2 (78%) | 100.6 | -0.60 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1811 | 137.5 | -0.74 | -2.12 | 0.901 | 47.9% | +27 | -60 | -83 | 46.3% | -0.35 | 5–3 (63%) | 6–4 (60%) | 104.0 | -0.64 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 1727 | 114.6 | -1.24 | -1.82 | 0.702 | 43.0% | +27 | — | — | 7.7% | -2.46 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | -0.27 |
| Career | — | 1884 | 142.7 | -0.06 | -0.20 | 0.977 | 49.7% | -8 | -22 | -27 | 49.8% | -0.02 | 40–61 (40%) | 51–39 (57%) | 97.0 | -0.89 | — | 1944 | 149.9 | +1.44 | +1.21 | 1.037 | 50.8% | +15 | -30 | -132 | 54.5% | +0.35 | 137–115 (54%) | 101–91 (53%) | 100.2 | -0.90 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jasmine Paolini | 1 | 6 | 7 | May 25, 2026 | H2H |
| Donna Vekic | 2 | 4 | 6 | Jul 7, 2024 | H2H |
| Shuai Zhang | 2 | 3 | 5 | Mar 5, 2026 | H2H |
| Magda Linette | 4 | 1 | 5 | Jun 21, 2025 | H2H |
| Ajla Tomljanovic | 3 | 1 | 4 | Jun 11, 2026 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Angelique Kerber | 8 | 6 | 14 | Jan 28, 2020 | H2H |
| Victoria Azarenka | 3 | 8 | 11 | Aug 27, 2025 | H2H |
| Petra Kvitova | 3 | 8 | 11 | Mar 4, 2021 | H2H |
| Svetlana Kuznetsova | 4 | 6 | 10 | Sep 29, 2020 | H2H |
| Dominika Cibulkova | 4 | 6 | 10 | May 26, 2018 | H2H |