H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Dayana Yastremska vs Anastasia Potapova H2H: 1-2
Anastasia Potapova holds a 2–1 lead over Dayana Yastremska in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Anastasia Potapova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Anastasia Potapova won the 2025 Rome first round 2-6 7-6(6) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
UKR
Age 26
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
AUT
Age 25
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 7, 2025 | Rome | WTA 1000 | R128 | Clay | Anastasia Potapova | 2-6 7-6(6) 6-3 | Dayana Yastremska | Match data |
| Feb 18, 2025 | Dubai | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Dayana Yastremska | 6-2 6-3 | Anastasia Potapova | Match data |
| Jan 1, 2025 | Brisbane | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Anastasia Potapova | 7-5 6-4 | Dayana Yastremska | Match data |
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dayana Yastremska | #74 | #21 | 2,070 | 1,884 | 134 | 146 | 47.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Anastasia Potapova | #27 | #21 | 1,865 | 1,965 | 163 | 132 | 55.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Dayana Yastremska | Anastasia Potapova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #338 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #241 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2017 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #184 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 9–4 | 69.2% | #93 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2018 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #58 | 1,730 | 0 | 1 | 2019 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #92 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2019 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #22 | 1,821 | 0 | 3 | 2020 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #101 | 1,685 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2020 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #29 | 1,790 | 0 | 3 | 2021 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #69 | 1,687 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2021 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #99 | 1,704 | 0 | 3 | 2022 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #43 | 1,750 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2022 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #101 | 1,600 | 0 | 3 | 2023 | 28–19 | 59.6% | #27 | 1,784 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2023 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #102 | 1,669 | 0 | 3 | 2024 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #35 | 1,802 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2024 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #33 | 1,656 | 0 | 3 | 2025 | 23–16 | 59.0% | #50 | 1,841 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2025 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #27 | 1,816 | 0 | 3 | 2026 | 21–13 | 61.8% | #27 | 1,879 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2026 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #74 | 1,758 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |