H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC
Dayana Yastremska vs Barbora Krejcikova H2H: 1-2
Barbora Krejcikova holds a 2–1 lead over Dayana Yastremska in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Barbora Krejcikova leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Barbora Krejcikova won the 2023 Indian Wells second round 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
UKR
Age 26
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 30
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 2023* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Barbora Krejcikova | 6-1 6-2 | Dayana Yastremska | Match data |
| Feb 17, 2022* | Dubai | WTA 1000 | R16 | Hard | Dayana Yastremska | 6-3 7-6(3) | Barbora Krejcikova | Match data |
| Aug 19, 2021* | Cincinnati | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Barbora Krejcikova | 6-1 7-6(5) | Dayana Yastremska | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dayana Yastremska | #74 | #21 | 2,070 | 1,884 | 134 | 146 | 47.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Barbora Krejcikova | #32 | #2 | 5,533 | 2,028 | 168 | 101 | 62.5% | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 9 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Dayana Yastremska | Barbora Krejcikova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #338 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2017 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #184 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2018 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #58 | 1,730 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #174 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2019 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #22 | 1,821 | 0 | 3 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2020 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #29 | 1,790 | 0 | 3 | 2016 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #252 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2021 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #99 | 1,704 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #126 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2022 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #101 | 1,600 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #204 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2023 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #102 | 1,669 | 0 | 3 | 2019 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #131 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2024 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #33 | 1,656 | 0 | 3 | 2020 | 9–5 | 64.3% | #65 | 1,707 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2025 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #27 | 1,816 | 0 | 3 | 2021 | 42–15 | 73.7% | #5 | 1,955 | 1 | 3 |
| 26 | 2026 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #74 | 1,758 | 0 | 3 | 2022 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #22 | 1,928 | 1 | 5 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 32–18 | 64.0% | #10 | 1,910 | 1 | 7 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #10 | 1,893 | 2 | 8 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 14–9 | 60.9% | #65 | 1,895 | 2 | 8 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 14–7 | 66.7% | #32 | 1,954 | 2 | 9 |