Dayana Yastremska
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jasmine Paolini | 1 | 6 | 7 | May 25, 2026 | H2H |
| Magda Linette | 5 | 1 | 6 | Jun 25, 2025 | H2H |
| Donna Vekic | 2 | 4 | 6 | Jul 7, 2024 | H2H |
| Shuai Zhang | 2 | 3 | 5 | Mar 5, 2026 | H2H |
| Ajla Tomljanovic | 3 | 1 | 4 | Jun 11, 2026 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-10-31 00:00 UTC
Dayana Yastremska vs Barbora Krejcikova H2H: 1-2
Barbora Krejcikova holds a 2–1 lead over Dayana Yastremska in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Barbora Krejcikova leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Barbora Krejcikova won the 2023 Indian Wells Open second round 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
1
–
2
3 main-draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barbora Krejcikova | 6-1 6-2 | Dayana Yastremska | Match data | Mar 11, 2023* | R64 | Indian Wells Open | WTA 1000 | Hard |
| Dayana Yastremska | 6-3 7-6(3) | Barbora Krejcikova | Match data | Feb 17, 2022* | R16 | Dubai Tennis Championships | WTA 500 | Hard |
| Barbora Krejcikova | 6-1 7-6(5) | Dayana Yastremska | Match data | Aug 19, 2021* | R32 | Cincinnati Open | WTA 1000 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dayana Yastremska | #97 | #21 | 2,070 | 1,885 | 141 | 154 | 47.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Barbora Krejcikova | #46 | #2 | 5,533 | 2,013 | 178 | 107 | 62.5% | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 9 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Dayana Yastremska | Barbora Krejcikova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #338 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2017 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #184 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2018 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #58 | 1,730 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #174 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2019 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #22 | 1,822 | 0 | 3 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #188 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2020 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #29 | 1,792 | 0 | 3 | 2016 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #252 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2021 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #99 | 1,692 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #126 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2022 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #101 | 1,614 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #204 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2023 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #102 | 1,669 | 0 | 3 | 2019 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #131 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2024 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #33 | 1,648 | 0 | 3 | 2020 | 9–5 | 64.3% | #65 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2025 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #27 | 1,816 | 0 | 3 | 2021 | 44–16 | 73.3% | #5 | 1,942 | 1 | 3 |
| 26 | 2026 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #97 | 1,739 | 0 | 3 | 2022 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #22 | 1,909 | 1 | 5 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 32–18 | 64.0% | #10 | 1,906 | 1 | 7 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #10 | 1,896 | 2 | 8 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 16–10 | 61.5% | #65 | 1,902 | 2 | 8 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #46 | 1,876 | 2 | 9 |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Dayana Yastremska | Barbora Krejcikova | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 16 | 2016 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2017 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2018 | 9 | 6 | 15 | 60.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2019 | 23 | 14 | 37 | 62.2% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 2015 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2020 | 10 | 9 | 19 | 52.6% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2021 | 5 | 11 | 16 | 31.3% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2022 | 7 | 10 | 17 | 41.2% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 2018 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2023 | 4 | 10 | 14 | 28.6% | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | — | — | — | — | 2019 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2024 | 8 | 13 | 21 | 38.1% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 2020 | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2025 | 12 | 13 | 25 | 48.0% | 10 | 6 | 16 | 62.5% | 8 | 3 | 11 | 72.7% | 2021 | 26 | 12 | 38 | 68.4% | 15 | 3 | 18 | 83.3% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% |
| 26 | 2026 | 10 | 15 | 25 | 40.0% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 2022 | 22 | 10 | 32 | 68.8% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 23 | 12 | 35 | 65.7% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 9 | 9 | 18 | 50.0% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 9 | 2 | 11 | 81.8% |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 11 | 5 | 16 | 68.8% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 10 | 7 | 17 | 58.8% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% |
| Career | — | 88 | 102 | 190 | 46.3% | 34 | 36 | 70 | 48.6% | 19 | 16 | 35 | 54.3% | — | 109 | 65 | 174 | 62.6% | 39 | 29 | 68 | 57.4% | 30 | 13 | 43 | 69.8% |
Performance Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 272/296 of Dayana Yastremska's and 265/285 of Barbora Krejcikova's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Dayana Yastremska | Barbora Krejcikova | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 16 | 2016 | 2/2 | 2.5 | 6.0 | 56.2% | 65.3% | 38.9% | 52.3% | 24.3% | 53.0% | 40.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2017 | 4/4 | 1.5 | 3.5 | 66.0% | 50.4% | 54.9% | 55.8% | 51.8% | 52.1% | 49.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2018 | 16/16 | 4.1 | 5.7 | 60.7% | 65.8% | 49.1% | 41.8% | 42.8% | 59.2% | 46.9% | 2014 | 2/2 | 2.5 | 3.0 | 69.1% | 64.0% | 38.7% | 62.3% | 62.5% | 56.4% | 47.6% |
| 19 | 2019 | 51/52 | 3.8 | 5.1 | 60.2% | 65.2% | 48.7% | 60.0% | 48.4% | 58.4% | 44.8% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2020 | 26/26 | 4.5 | 5.7 | 58.9% | 67.5% | 46.3% | 45.5% | 47.4% | 58.7% | 42.0% | 2016 | 7/7 | 2.4 | 4.3 | 60.3% | 65.0% | 42.6% | 61.7% | 46.6% | 55.6% | 42.1% |
| 21 | 2021 | 18/19 | 4.1 | 5.6 | 57.9% | 66.1% | 45.9% | 51.1% | 42.2% | 57.7% | 43.3% | 2017 | 9/10 | 3.2 | 4.1 | 60.2% | 64.5% | 41.8% | 58.0% | 36.3% | 55.4% | 46.9% |
| 22 | 2022 | 29/29 | 3.4 | 5.2 | 57.8% | 63.8% | 44.4% | 54.0% | 49.6% | 55.7% | 38.7% | 2018 | 4/4 | 2.5 | 4.5 | 49.7% | 60.1% | 43.0% | 45.7% | 42.1% | 51.0% | 45.4% |
| 23 | 2023 | 21/21 | 2.5 | 5.2 | 57.8% | 59.4% | 42.8% | 40.6% | 53.6% | 52.2% | 41.9% | 2019 | 3/3 | 1.3 | 0.7 | 77.5% | 60.2% | 47.2% | 68.5% | 55.0% | 57.4% | 48.5% |
| 24 | 2024 | 34/36 | 2.9 | 4.3 | 57.8% | 60.9% | 47.1% | 51.9% | 44.5% | 55.0% | 42.0% | 2020 | 14/14 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 63.9% | 67.2% | 41.3% | 52.9% | 43.0% | 57.9% | 45.1% |
| 25 | 2025 | 34/53 | 3.4 | 5.5 | 56.3% | 63.0% | 49.7% | 54.0% | 51.1% | 57.1% | 41.8% | 2021 | 57/60 | 3.5 | 4.0 | 59.1% | 70.1% | 50.2% | 60.5% | 50.6% | 62.0% | 45.0% |
| 26 | 2026 | 37/38 | 2.3 | 4.9 | 62.4% | 60.1% | 47.0% | 49.2% | 45.1% | 54.9% | 41.5% | 2022 | 40/41 | 3.6 | 4.7 | 59.9% | 70.3% | 47.5% | 57.0% | 51.0% | 61.1% | 45.0% |
| 27 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 48/50 | 3.4 | 4.1 | 59.8% | 69.9% | 46.8% | 52.2% | 50.9% | 60.6% | 44.3% |
| 28 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 32/37 | 3.5 | 4.3 | 63.0% | 68.6% | 45.2% | 55.9% | 47.8% | 60.1% | 42.5% |
| 29 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 22/26 | 3.2 | 5.5 | 59.6% | 67.2% | 44.4% | 53.5% | 53.0% | 58.0% | 44.1% |
| 30 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 27/31 | 4.2 | 4.6 | 61.5% | 69.2% | 47.2% | 56.6% | 47.6% | 60.8% | 44.6% |
| Career | — | 272/296 | 3.3 | 5.2 | 59.1% | 63.2% | 47.1% | 51.5% | 47.4% | 56.5% | 42.5% | — | 265/286 | 3.4 | 4.3 | 60.6% | 68.8% | 46.6% | 56.4% | 49.2% | 60.0% | 44.5% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Dayana Yastremska | Barbora Krejcikova | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 16 | 2016 | 1464 | 101.4 | -1.01 | -2.08 | 0.858 | 46.1% | — | — | — | 20.0% | -1.40 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.03 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2017 | 1462 | 104.9 | -0.92 | +0.23 | 1.038 | 50.9% | — | +57 | — | 50.0% | +0.50 | 1–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2018 | 1731 | 136.2 | +1.60 | +2.48 | 1.148 | 52.9% | +20 | — | — | 60.5% | +1.03 | 1–5 (17%) | 2–4 (33%) | 94.2 | -0.03 | 2014 | 1504 | 102.8 | -0.26 | +0.43 | 1.090 | 52.0% | — | — | — | 60.0% | +0.60 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.14 |
| 19 | 2019 | 1822 | 152.1 | +1.72 | +2.31 | 1.077 | 51.7% | +13 | -207 | -152 | 60.2% | +0.63 | 5–9 (36%) | 6–5 (55%) | 95.7 | -1.96 | 2015 | 1489 | 99.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.50 | — | — | — | +0.09 |
| 20 | 2020 | 1792 | 144.5 | +1.19 | -0.19 | 1.016 | 50.4% | +18 | -118 | — | 50.8% | +0.08 | 5–4 (56%) | 5–5 (50%) | 100.7 | -1.02 | 2016 | 1508 | 113.7 | +0.66 | +0.02 | 0.949 | 49.1% | +26 | +26 | — | 38.9% | -0.67 | 1–3 (25%) | — | — | -0.80 |
| 21 | 2021 | 1693 | 125.3 | +1.13 | -0.92 | 1.021 | 50.3% | -17 | -2 | — | 47.7% | 0.00 | 1–7 (13%) | 4–4 (50%) | 91.7 | -0.11 | 2017 | 1564 | 115.5 | +0.38 | +1.03 | 1.052 | 51.1% | — | +111 | — | 47.4% | -0.05 | 2–3 (40%) | 1–0 | — | -0.09 |
| 22 | 2022 | 1614 | 124.3 | -0.45 | -2.85 | 0.874 | 47.6% | +13 | +47 | +11 | 43.1% | -0.63 | 5–6 (45%) | 7–4 (64%) | 100.8 | -0.44 | 2018 | 1544 | 112.6 | -2.26 | +1.26 | 0.925 | 48.1% | -34 | — | — | 14.3% | -1.14 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.10 |
| 23 | 2023 | 1669 | 127.2 | -3.00 | -0.65 | 0.875 | 47.1% | +26 | -37 | — | 31.3% | -1.19 | 1–5 (17%) | 2–4 (33%) | 92.8 | +0.36 | 2019 | 1546 | 98.3 | -0.20 | +0.69 | 1.139 | 53.5% | — | +58 | — | 40.0% | -0.60 | 1–0 | — | — | +0.30 |
| 24 | 2024 | 1649 | 136.0 | -0.99 | -0.74 | 0.933 | 48.8% | 0 | +39 | 0 | 45.1% | -0.28 | 9–5 (64%) | 7–5 (58%) | 105.5 | +1.15 | 2020 | 1700 | 133.2 | +1.74 | +1.17 | 1.071 | 51.2% | -61 | -17 | — | 59.5% | +0.38 | 5–4 (56%) | 2–0 | — | +0.28 |
| 25 | 2025 | 1817 | 146.0 | +0.41 | -0.56 | 0.975 | 49.9% | -84 | -10 | -16 | 57.9% | +0.45 | 8–8 (50%) | 11–3 (79%) | 107.3 | -0.93 | 2021 | 1943 | 158.0 | +4.93 | +2.86 | 1.184 | 53.4% | -68 | +46 | -256 | 66.2% | +1.44 | 13–4 (76%) | 7–6 (54%) | 111.8 | -0.54 |
| 26 | 2026 | 1739 | 130.8 | -1.85 | -1.59 | 0.919 | 48.3% | -32 | +74 | +35 | 42.9% | -0.65 | 6–9 (40%) | 8–4 (67%) | 99.9 | +0.24 | 2022 | 1910 | 149.3 | +3.27 | +2.35 | 1.156 | 52.8% | +41 | -8 | -231 | 61.5% | +0.80 | 5–6 (45%) | 8–5 (62%) | 99.8 | +0.24 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 1906 | 157.8 | +4.11 | +1.82 | 1.123 | 52.4% | +67 | -60 | -137 | 61.0% | +1.00 | 7–4 (64%) | 3–7 (30%) | 99.6 | +0.43 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 1897 | 140.8 | +3.38 | -0.19 | 1.064 | 51.2% | +6 | -116 | +120 | 54.2% | +0.13 | 8–7 (53%) | 10–2 (83%) | 105.2 | -0.11 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1902 | 138.7 | +1.22 | +0.87 | 1.050 | 50.8% | +32 | -157 | +132 | 55.9% | +0.32 | 10–1 (91%) | 4–1 (80%) | 110.6 | +0.47 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 1876 | 137.9 | +2.57 | +1.56 | 1.138 | 52.7% | +6 | -93 | +166 | 64.1% | +1.09 | 3–5 (38%) | 5–6 (45%) | 94.8 | +0.30 |
| Career | — | 1885 | 142.9 | -0.02 | -0.24 | 0.977 | 49.7% | -8 | -26 | -24 | 49.9% | -0.02 | 42–60 (41%) | 52–39 (57%) | 98.2 | -0.88 | — | 2013 | 150.7 | +3.15 | +1.64 | 1.114 | 52.2% | +8 | -3 | +23 | 59.1% | +0.73 | 55–39 (59%) | 40–28 (59%) | 109.6 | +0.29 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Barbora Krejcikova
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aryna Sabalenka | 1 | 7 | 8 | May 7, 2026 | H2H |
| Ekaterina Alexandrova | 3 | 3 | 6 | Sep 26, 2025 | H2H |
| Iga Swiatek | 2 | 4 | 6 | Sep 20, 2025 | H2H |
| Jelena Ostapenko | 3 | 3 | 6 | Jul 11, 2024 | H2H |
| Liudmila Samsonova | 1 | 4 | 5 | Aug 5, 2026 | H2H |