H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Dayana Yastremska vs Caroline Garcia H2H: 2-1
Dayana Yastremska holds a 2–1 lead over Caroline Garcia in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Dayana Yastremska leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Caroline Garcia won the 2022 Indian Wells first round 6-4 6-7(8) 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
UKR
Age 26
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 32
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 2022* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Caroline Garcia | 6-4 6-7(8) 7-5 | Dayana Yastremska | Match data |
| Sep 29, 2019 | Beijing | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Dayana Yastremska | 6-1 6-1 | Caroline Garcia | Match data |
| May 25, 2019* | Strasbourg | WTA 500 | F | Clay | Dayana Yastremska | 6-4 5-7 7-6(3) | Caroline Garcia | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dayana Yastremska | #74 | #21 | 2,070 | 1,884 | 134 | 146 | 47.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Caroline Garcia | #452 | #4 | 5,170 | 2,008 | 335 | 263 | 56.0% | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 11 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Dayana Yastremska | Caroline Garcia | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #338 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2017 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #184 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #142 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2018 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #58 | 1,730 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #154 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2019 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #22 | 1,821 | 0 | 3 | 2013 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #74 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2020 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #29 | 1,790 | 0 | 3 | 2014 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #37 | 1,669 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2021 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #99 | 1,704 | 0 | 3 | 2015 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #34 | 1,711 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2022 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #101 | 1,600 | 0 | 3 | 2016 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #24 | 1,763 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2023 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #102 | 1,669 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 48–22 | 68.6% | #8 | 1,969 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 2024 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #33 | 1,656 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #19 | 1,917 | 0 | 6 |
| 25 | 2025 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #27 | 1,816 | 0 | 3 | 2019 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #46 | 1,694 | 0 | 7 |
| 26 | 2026 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #74 | 1,758 | 0 | 3 | 2020 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #43 | 1,735 | 0 | 7 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #74 | 1,700 | 0 | 7 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 44–20 | 68.8% | #4 | 1,988 | 0 | 11 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #20 | 1,831 | 0 | 11 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #48 | 1,797 | 0 | 11 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #304 | 1,745 | 0 | 11 |