Dayana Yastremska
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jasmine Paolini | 1 | 6 | 7 | May 25, 2026 | H2H |
| Donna Vekic | 2 | 4 | 6 | Jul 7, 2024 | H2H |
| Shuai Zhang | 2 | 3 | 5 | Mar 5, 2026 | H2H |
| Magda Linette | 4 | 1 | 5 | Jun 21, 2025 | H2H |
| Ajla Tomljanovic | 3 | 1 | 4 | Jun 11, 2026 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC
Dayana Yastremska vs Lauren Davis
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Dayana Yastremska vs Lauren Davis.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
0
–
0
0 main-draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dayana Yastremska | 6-3 6-3 | Lauren Davis | Match data | Feb 18, 2023 | Q2 | Dubai Tennis Championships | WTA 1000 | Hard |
1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dayana Yastremska | #113 | #21 | 2,070 | 1,884 | 135 | 150 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Lauren Davis | #499 | #26 | 1,646 | 1,837 | 143 | 182 | 44.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Dayana Yastremska | Lauren Davis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #338 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2017 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #184 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #319 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2018 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #58 | 1,730 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #91 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2019 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #22 | 1,822 | 0 | 3 | 2013 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #70 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2020 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #29 | 1,792 | 0 | 3 | 2014 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #55 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2021 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #99 | 1,692 | 0 | 3 | 2015 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #88 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2022 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #101 | 1,614 | 0 | 3 | 2016 | 15–9 | 62.5% | #61 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2023 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #102 | 1,669 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #50 | 1,624 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2024 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #33 | 1,648 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #173 | 1,603 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2025 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #27 | 1,816 | 0 | 3 | 2019 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #64 | 1,733 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2026 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #113 | 1,705 | 0 | 3 | 2020 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #75 | 1,622 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #89 | 1,646 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #87 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #68 | 1,682 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #270 | 1,625 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #362 | 1,592 | 0 | 2 |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Dayana Yastremska | Lauren Davis | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 16 | 2016 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2017 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2011 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2018 | 9 | 6 | 15 | 60.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2019 | 23 | 14 | 37 | 62.2% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 2013 | 11 | 12 | 23 | 47.8% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 20 | 2020 | 10 | 9 | 19 | 52.6% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 13 | 12 | 25 | 52.0% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% |
| 21 | 2021 | 5 | 11 | 16 | 31.3% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 7 | 14 | 21 | 33.3% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% |
| 22 | 2022 | 7 | 10 | 17 | 41.2% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 2016 | 15 | 6 | 21 | 71.4% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 23 | 2023 | 4 | 10 | 14 | 28.6% | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 14 | 13 | 27 | 51.9% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% |
| 24 | 2024 | 8 | 13 | 21 | 38.1% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 2018 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2025 | 12 | 13 | 25 | 48.0% | 10 | 6 | 16 | 62.5% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | 2019 | 5 | 8 | 13 | 38.5% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% |
| 26 | 2026 | 6 | 12 | 18 | 33.3% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 2020 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 5 | 9 | 14 | 35.7% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 10 | 8 | 18 | 55.6% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 84 | 99 | 183 | 45.9% | 34 | 36 | 70 | 48.6% | 17 | 15 | 32 | 53.1% | — | 97 | 113 | 210 | 46.2% | 25 | 41 | 66 | 37.9% | 21 | 28 | 49 | 42.9% |
Performance Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 265/286 of Dayana Yastremska's and 304/325 of Lauren Davis's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Dayana Yastremska | Lauren Davis | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 16 | 2016 | 2/2 | 2.5 | 6.0 | 56.2% | 65.3% | 38.9% | 52.3% | 24.3% | 53.0% | 40.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2017 | 4/4 | 1.5 | 3.5 | 66.0% | 50.4% | 54.9% | 55.8% | 51.8% | 52.1% | 49.7% | 2011 | 3/3 | 0.7 | 3.0 | 49.5% | 55.1% | 40.4% | 46.3% | 16.7% | 47.3% | 23.6% |
| 18 | 2018 | 16/16 | 4.1 | 5.7 | 60.7% | 65.8% | 49.1% | 41.8% | 42.8% | 59.2% | 46.9% | 2012 | 10/10 | 1.0 | 2.2 | 66.5% | 59.2% | 48.6% | 48.5% | 36.9% | 55.6% | 42.9% |
| 19 | 2019 | 51/52 | 3.8 | 5.1 | 60.2% | 65.2% | 48.7% | 60.0% | 48.4% | 58.4% | 44.8% | 2013 | 23/30 | 0.7 | 2.6 | 62.6% | 56.8% | 42.6% | 49.6% | 41.8% | 51.6% | 39.9% |
| 20 | 2020 | 26/26 | 4.5 | 5.7 | 58.9% | 67.5% | 46.3% | 45.5% | 47.4% | 58.7% | 42.0% | 2014 | 38/41 | 0.8 | 2.9 | 63.1% | 60.7% | 42.4% | 47.5% | 42.8% | 54.0% | 42.8% |
| 21 | 2021 | 18/19 | 4.1 | 5.6 | 57.9% | 66.1% | 45.9% | 51.1% | 42.2% | 57.7% | 43.3% | 2015 | 29/34 | 1.0 | 4.4 | 64.0% | 63.0% | 46.0% | 43.8% | 54.2% | 56.8% | 40.7% |
| 22 | 2022 | 29/29 | 3.4 | 5.2 | 57.8% | 63.8% | 44.4% | 54.0% | 49.6% | 55.7% | 38.7% | 2016 | 19/24 | 1.6 | 2.9 | 59.7% | 62.9% | 44.5% | 51.5% | 50.5% | 55.7% | 45.3% |
| 23 | 2023 | 21/21 | 2.5 | 5.2 | 57.8% | 59.4% | 42.8% | 40.6% | 53.6% | 52.2% | 41.9% | 2017 | 41/42 | 1.4 | 5.6 | 60.5% | 59.3% | 40.8% | 50.4% | 56.0% | 52.1% | 47.6% |
| 24 | 2024 | 34/36 | 2.9 | 4.3 | 57.8% | 60.9% | 47.1% | 51.9% | 44.5% | 55.0% | 42.0% | 2018 | 8/8 | 1.5 | 6.3 | 59.3% | 57.6% | 37.5% | 54.0% | 48.6% | 49.5% | 41.6% |
| 25 | 2025 | 34/50 | 3.4 | 5.5 | 56.3% | 63.0% | 49.7% | 54.0% | 51.1% | 57.1% | 41.8% | 2019 | 21/21 | 1.6 | 3.4 | 61.4% | 60.2% | 48.6% | 60.3% | 50.7% | 55.7% | 41.3% |
| 26 | 2026 | 30/31 | 2.2 | 5.1 | 61.3% | 59.5% | 46.4% | 48.9% | 46.5% | 54.2% | 41.4% | 2020 | 14/14 | 1.4 | 1.7 | 66.5% | 57.2% | 45.3% | 49.9% | 52.1% | 53.2% | 43.2% |
| 27 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 28/28 | 1.9 | 3.0 | 55.3% | 63.8% | 44.5% | 46.1% | 45.0% | 55.1% | 42.0% |
| 28 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 30/30 | 2.1 | 3.4 | 56.8% | 64.4% | 42.8% | 50.4% | 50.5% | 54.9% | 42.7% |
| 29 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 30/30 | 1.6 | 3.4 | 61.1% | 61.0% | 45.3% | 48.1% | 52.8% | 54.9% | 42.8% |
| 30 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 5/5 | 0.6 | 3.0 | 56.6% | 48.9% | 39.4% | 44.0% | 51.9% | 43.5% | 35.7% |
| 31 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 5/5 | 0.8 | 1.6 | 57.8% | 48.9% | 44.0% | 47.2% | 43.9% | 47.3% | 41.8% |
| Career | — | 265/286 | 3.4 | 5.2 | 58.9% | 63.2% | 47.0% | 51.5% | 47.6% | 56.4% | 42.6% | — | 304/325 | 1.4 | 3.5 | 60.8% | 60.5% | 43.8% | 49.3% | 48.9% | 53.9% | 42.7% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Dayana Yastremska | Lauren Davis | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 16 | 2016 | 1464 | 101.4 | -1.01 | -2.08 | 0.858 | 46.1% | — | — | — | 20.0% | -1.40 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.03 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2017 | 1462 | 104.9 | -0.92 | +0.23 | 1.038 | 50.9% | — | +57 | — | 50.0% | +0.50 | 1–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.10 | 2011 | 1469 | 96.1 | -1.99 | -3.92 | 0.448 | 35.8% | +25 | — | — | 0.0% | -3.83 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.06 |
| 18 | 2018 | 1731 | 136.1 | +1.60 | +2.48 | 1.148 | 52.9% | +20 | — | — | 60.5% | +1.03 | 1–5 (17%) | 2–4 (33%) | 94.2 | -0.03 | 2012 | 1497 | 108.5 | -1.41 | -0.02 | 0.967 | 49.1% | +2 | +46 | — | 42.9% | -0.10 | 0–1 | 1–2 (33%) | — | +0.28 |
| 19 | 2019 | 1822 | 150.9 | +1.72 | +2.31 | 1.077 | 51.7% | +13 | -207 | -152 | 60.2% | +0.63 | 5–9 (36%) | 6–5 (55%) | 95.7 | -1.96 | 2013 | 1576 | 111.7 | -3.39 | -2.88 | 0.824 | 45.7% | +11 | -54 | -36 | 40.6% | -1.01 | 7–4 (64%) | 6–2 (75%) | 108.1 | -0.03 |
| 20 | 2020 | 1792 | 146.0 | +1.19 | -0.19 | 1.016 | 50.4% | +18 | -118 | — | 52.5% | +0.16 | 5–4 (56%) | 5–5 (50%) | 100.7 | -1.02 | 2014 | 1654 | 126.2 | -1.49 | -0.23 | 0.930 | 48.3% | -1 | -154 | +33 | 51.1% | -0.11 | 6–4 (60%) | 5–1 (83%) | 105.7 | +0.07 |
| 21 | 2021 | 1693 | 125.3 | +1.13 | -0.92 | 1.021 | 50.3% | -17 | -2 | — | 47.7% | 0.00 | 1–7 (13%) | 4–4 (50%) | 91.7 | -0.11 | 2015 | 1580 | 117.4 | -0.82 | -0.57 | 0.941 | 48.6% | -2 | -59 | +76 | 36.0% | -1.15 | 6–5 (55%) | 7–4 (64%) | 103.8 | -1.82 |
| 22 | 2022 | 1614 | 122.9 | -0.45 | -2.85 | 0.874 | 47.6% | +13 | +47 | +10 | 43.1% | -0.63 | 5–6 (45%) | 7–4 (64%) | 100.8 | -0.44 | 2016 | 1699 | 128.3 | -1.36 | +1.29 | 1.023 | 50.4% | +49 | — | — | 57.1% | +0.29 | 6–4 (60%) | 2–1 (67%) | 104.7 | -0.31 |
| 23 | 2023 | 1669 | 127.5 | -3.00 | -0.65 | 0.875 | 47.1% | +26 | -37 | — | 31.3% | -1.19 | 1–5 (17%) | 2–4 (33%) | 92.8 | +0.36 | 2017 | 1624 | 128.1 | -3.03 | +3.62 | 0.995 | 50.0% | +63 | -69 | -64 | 47.4% | -0.11 | 6–7 (46%) | 4–3 (57%) | 99.9 | +0.39 |
| 24 | 2024 | 1649 | 136.0 | -0.99 | -0.74 | 0.933 | 48.8% | 0 | +39 | 0 | 45.1% | -0.28 | 9–5 (64%) | 7–5 (58%) | 105.5 | +1.15 | 2018 | 1603 | 108.4 | -2.94 | -0.71 | 0.824 | 45.7% | +42 | — | — | 30.0% | -1.00 | 2–2 (50%) | 0–1 | — | +0.10 |
| 25 | 2025 | 1816 | 146.4 | +0.46 | -0.46 | 0.975 | 49.9% | -83 | -9 | -41 | 56.5% | +0.37 | 8–9 (47%) | 11–3 (79%) | 106.2 | -1.02 | 2019 | 1734 | 133.2 | -0.71 | -1.22 | 0.932 | 48.8% | -2 | -166 | -55 | 43.2% | -0.39 | 3–1 (75%) | 1–2 (33%) | 103.3 | -0.90 |
| 26 | 2026 | 1706 | 127.7 | -2.66 | -1.59 | 0.905 | 48.1% | -45 | +111 | +58 | 41.3% | -0.73 | 4–9 (31%) | 7–4 (64%) | 97.2 | +0.44 | 2020 | 1623 | 118.4 | -2.04 | -0.34 | 0.923 | 48.3% | +39 | — | — | 40.6% | -0.75 | 1–3 (25%) | 2–2 (50%) | 96.2 | -0.17 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1646 | 122.0 | -1.24 | -0.82 | 0.936 | 48.4% | -3 | -115 | +89 | 42.6% | -0.66 | 5–4 (56%) | 1–3 (25%) | 101.0 | -0.59 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 1715 | 129.3 | -1.29 | -0.08 | 0.947 | 48.7% | -7 | -84 | -9 | 42.4% | -0.62 | 4–4 (50%) | 4–6 (40%) | 99.0 | -1.24 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 1682 | 126.0 | -1.26 | -0.82 | 0.950 | 48.9% | +20 | -11 | -71 | 50.7% | -0.24 | 5–8 (38%) | 6–0 (100%) | 100.9 | -0.58 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 1625 | 96.9 | -3.79 | -3.39 | 0.631 | 39.9% | — | — | — | 9.1% | -3.18 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | -0.30 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1593 | 110.2 | -1.83 | -2.46 | 0.794 | 44.6% | +38 | — | — | 33.3% | -1.42 | 2–0 | — | — | 0.00 |
| Career | — | 1884 | 142.7 | -0.06 | -0.20 | 0.977 | 49.7% | -8 | -22 | -27 | 49.8% | -0.02 | 40–61 (40%) | 51–39 (57%) | 97.0 | -0.88 | — | 1838 | 128.2 | -1.76 | -0.15 | 0.925 | 48.3% | +20 | -77 | +9 | 43.9% | -0.54 | 53–48 (52%) | 39–29 (57%) | 108.1 | -1.56 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Lauren Davis
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sloane Stephens | 3 | 3 | 6 | Aug 23, 2023 | H2H |
| Danka Kovinic | 3 | 2 | 5 | Aug 30, 2023 | H2H |
| Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova | 2 | 3 | 5 | May 26, 2023 | H2H |
| Jelena Ostapenko | 2 | 3 | 5 | Oct 19, 2022 | H2H |
| Madison Keys | 1 | 4 | 5 | Jun 23, 2022 | H2H |