H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC
Dayana Yastremska vs Lesia Tsurenko
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Dayana Yastremska vs Lesia Tsurenko.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
UKR
Age 26
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
0
0 main draw meetings
UKR
Age 37
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No head-to-head meetings found. | ||||||||
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dayana Yastremska | #74 | #21 | 2,070 | 1,884 | 134 | 146 | 47.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Lesia Tsurenko | #370 | #23 | 2,030 | 1,889 | 180 | 200 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Dayana Yastremska | Lesia Tsurenko | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #338 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2017 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #184 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2018 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #58 | 1,730 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2019 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #22 | 1,821 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2020 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #29 | 1,790 | 0 | 3 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #284 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2021 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #99 | 1,704 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #155 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2022 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #101 | 1,600 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #113 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2023 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #102 | 1,669 | 0 | 3 | 2012 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #116 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2024 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #33 | 1,656 | 0 | 3 | 2013 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #68 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2025 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #27 | 1,816 | 0 | 3 | 2014 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #92 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2026 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #74 | 1,758 | 0 | 3 | 2015 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #33 | 1,738 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #57 | 1,728 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 22–24 | 47.8% | #42 | 1,699 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 26–18 | 59.1% | #27 | 1,814 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #73 | 1,734 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #146 | 1,746 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #118 | 1,738 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #137 | 1,745 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 24–15 | 61.5% | #31 | 1,866 | 0 | 4 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #115 | 1,693 | 0 | 4 |