Dayana Yastremska
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jasmine Paolini | 1 | 6 | 7 | May 25, 2026 | H2H |
| Donna Vekic | 2 | 4 | 6 | Jul 7, 2024 | H2H |
| Shuai Zhang | 2 | 3 | 5 | Mar 5, 2026 | H2H |
| Magda Linette | 4 | 1 | 5 | Jun 21, 2025 | H2H |
| Ajla Tomljanovic | 3 | 1 | 4 | Jun 11, 2026 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC
Dayana Yastremska vs Margarita Gasparyan H2H: 1-0
Dayana Yastremska holds a 1–0 lead over Margarita Gasparyan in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Dayana Yastremska leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Dayana Yastremska won the 2018 Luxembourg quarterfinal 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dayana Yastremska | 6-1 6-4 | Margarita Gasparyan | Match data | Oct 19, 2018* | QF | Luxembourg | International → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dayana Yastremska | #113 | #21 | 2,070 | 1,883 | 135 | 150 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Margarita Gasparyan | #1,358 | #41 | 1,213 | 1,773 | 50 | 57 | 46.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Dayana Yastremska | Margarita Gasparyan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #338 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2017 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #184 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #214 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2018 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #58 | 1,730 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2019 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #22 | 1,822 | 0 | 3 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #220 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2020 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #29 | 1,792 | 0 | 3 | 2015 | 10–6 | 62.5% | #61 | 1,616 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2021 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #99 | 1,692 | 0 | 3 | 2016 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #117 | 1,601 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2022 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #101 | 1,614 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2023 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #102 | 1,669 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 11–5 | 68.8% | #92 | 1,754 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2024 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #33 | 1,648 | 0 | 3 | 2019 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #104 | 1,685 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2025 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #27 | 1,815 | 0 | 3 | 2020 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #125 | 1,604 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2026 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #113 | 1,705 | 0 | 3 | 2021 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #164 | 1,605 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,527 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1358 | 1,464 | 0 | 2 |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Dayana Yastremska | Margarita Gasparyan | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 16 | 2016 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2017 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2012 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2018 | 9 | 6 | 15 | 60.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2019 | 23 | 14 | 37 | 62.2% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 2014 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2020 | 10 | 9 | 19 | 52.6% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 10 | 4 | 14 | 71.4% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 21 | 2021 | 5 | 11 | 16 | 31.3% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 8 | 7 | 15 | 53.3% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 22 | 2022 | 7 | 10 | 17 | 41.2% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2023 | 4 | 10 | 14 | 28.6% | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 11 | 5 | 16 | 68.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2024 | 8 | 13 | 21 | 38.1% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 2019 | 7 | 10 | 17 | 41.2% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% |
| 25 | 2025 | 12 | 13 | 25 | 48.0% | 10 | 6 | 16 | 62.5% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | 2020 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2026 | 6 | 12 | 18 | 33.3% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 2021 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 84 | 99 | 183 | 45.9% | 34 | 36 | 70 | 48.6% | 17 | 15 | 32 | 53.1% | — | 42 | 37 | 79 | 53.2% | 4 | 13 | 17 | 23.5% | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% |
Performance Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 265/286 of Dayana Yastremska's and 99/107 of Margarita Gasparyan's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Dayana Yastremska | Margarita Gasparyan | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 16 | 2016 | 2/2 | 2.5 | 6.0 | 56.2% | 65.3% | 38.9% | 52.3% | 24.3% | 53.0% | 40.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2017 | 4/4 | 1.5 | 3.5 | 66.0% | 50.4% | 54.9% | 55.8% | 51.8% | 52.1% | 49.7% | 2012 | 1/1 | 7.0 | 6.0 | 59.3% | 62.7% | 37.1% | 28.6% | 60.0% | 52.3% | 32.5% |
| 18 | 2018 | 16/16 | 4.1 | 5.7 | 60.7% | 65.8% | 49.1% | 41.8% | 42.8% | 59.2% | 46.9% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2019 | 51/52 | 3.8 | 5.1 | 60.2% | 65.2% | 48.7% | 60.0% | 48.4% | 58.4% | 44.8% | 2014 | 1/1 | 7.0 | 1.0 | 63.0% | 63.0% | 44.4% | 70.0% | 16.7% | 56.2% | 34.4% |
| 20 | 2020 | 26/26 | 4.5 | 5.7 | 58.9% | 67.5% | 46.3% | 45.5% | 47.4% | 58.7% | 42.0% | 2015 | 8/16 | 3.9 | 5.0 | 60.4% | 66.1% | 46.4% | 53.0% | 52.4% | 58.3% | 45.1% |
| 21 | 2021 | 18/19 | 4.1 | 5.6 | 57.9% | 66.1% | 45.9% | 51.1% | 42.2% | 57.7% | 43.3% | 2016 | 20/20 | 3.2 | 3.9 | 60.8% | 64.2% | 39.5% | 53.2% | 47.1% | 54.7% | 45.2% |
| 22 | 2022 | 29/29 | 3.4 | 5.2 | 57.8% | 63.8% | 44.4% | 54.0% | 49.6% | 55.7% | 38.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2023 | 21/21 | 2.5 | 5.2 | 57.8% | 59.4% | 42.8% | 40.6% | 53.6% | 52.2% | 41.9% | 2018 | 16/16 | 2.4 | 3.0 | 65.0% | 67.2% | 43.0% | 51.1% | 53.7% | 58.5% | 45.7% |
| 24 | 2024 | 34/36 | 2.9 | 4.3 | 57.8% | 60.9% | 47.1% | 51.9% | 44.5% | 55.0% | 42.0% | 2019 | 33/33 | 2.6 | 4.2 | 62.3% | 59.5% | 44.2% | 47.9% | 47.9% | 53.6% | 43.3% |
| 25 | 2025 | 34/50 | 3.4 | 5.5 | 56.3% | 63.0% | 49.7% | 54.0% | 51.1% | 57.1% | 41.8% | 2020 | 7/7 | 2.1 | 3.4 | 65.0% | 56.6% | 38.3% | 57.7% | 46.4% | 50.3% | 41.4% |
| 26 | 2026 | 30/31 | 2.2 | 5.0 | 62.3% | 59.4% | 46.7% | 48.9% | 46.5% | 54.2% | 41.4% | 2021 | 10/10 | 1.0 | 3.8 | 61.0% | 59.5% | 43.1% | 49.0% | 68.6% | 53.2% | 42.0% |
| 28 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 2/2 | 2.0 | 4.5 | 55.3% | 52.5% | 38.8% | 57.8% | 37.5% | 45.9% | 37.3% |
| 29 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 1/1 | 0.0 | 4.0 | 71.0% | 61.4% | 38.9% | 69.2% | 33.3% | 54.8% | 35.7% |
| Career | — | 265/286 | 3.4 | 5.2 | 59.0% | 63.2% | 47.1% | 51.5% | 47.6% | 56.4% | 42.6% | — | 99/107 | 2.7 | 3.9 | 62.3% | 62.0% | 42.5% | 51.2% | 50.5% | 54.6% | 43.5% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Dayana Yastremska | Margarita Gasparyan | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 16 | 2016 | 1464 | 101.4 | -1.01 | -2.08 | 0.858 | 46.1% | — | — | — | 20.0% | -1.40 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.03 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2017 | 1462 | 104.9 | -0.92 | +0.22 | 1.038 | 50.9% | — | +57 | — | 50.0% | +0.50 | 1–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.10 | 2012 | 1494 | 104.3 | -2.89 | +2.67 | 0.681 | 42.9% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.67 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.08 |
| 18 | 2018 | 1731 | 136.1 | +1.60 | +2.48 | 1.148 | 52.9% | +20 | — | — | 60.5% | +1.03 | 1–5 (17%) | 2–4 (33%) | — | -0.03 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2019 | 1822 | 150.9 | +1.72 | +2.31 | 1.077 | 51.7% | +13 | -207 | -152 | 60.2% | +0.63 | 5–9 (36%) | 6–5 (55%) | — | -1.96 | 2014 | 1481 | 99.9 | -3.71 | -2.68 | 0.784 | 46.0% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.50 | — | — | — | +0.05 |
| 20 | 2020 | 1792 | 146.0 | +1.19 | -0.19 | 1.016 | 50.4% | +18 | -118 | — | 52.5% | +0.16 | 5–4 (56%) | 5–5 (50%) | — | -1.02 | 2015 | 1616 | 122.9 | +0.55 | +2.10 | 1.081 | 51.8% | +23 | — | — | 56.8% | +0.51 | 4–1 (80%) | 2–2 (50%) | — | +0.38 |
| 21 | 2021 | 1693 | 125.3 | +1.13 | -0.92 | 1.021 | 50.3% | -17 | -2 | — | 47.7% | 0.00 | 1–7 (13%) | 4–4 (50%) | — | -0.11 | 2016 | 1602 | 131.4 | -0.67 | +0.78 | 0.996 | 49.7% | +80 | -126 | — | 46.5% | -0.23 | 1–4 (20%) | 1–2 (33%) | — | -0.31 |
| 22 | 2022 | 1614 | 122.9 | -0.45 | -2.85 | 0.874 | 47.6% | +13 | +47 | +10 | 43.1% | -0.63 | 5–6 (45%) | 7–4 (64%) | — | -0.44 | 2017 | 1582 | 100.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2023 | 1669 | 127.5 | -3.00 | -0.65 | 0.875 | 47.1% | +26 | -37 | — | 31.3% | -1.19 | 1–5 (17%) | 2–4 (33%) | — | +0.36 | 2018 | 1754 | 127.6 | +1.20 | +2.03 | 1.102 | 51.9% | +26 | — | — | 60.0% | +0.69 | 4–1 (80%) | 3–1 (75%) | — | -0.44 |
| 24 | 2024 | 1649 | 136.0 | -0.99 | -0.74 | 0.933 | 48.8% | 0 | +39 | 0 | 45.1% | -0.28 | 9–5 (64%) | 7–5 (58%) | — | +1.15 | 2019 | 1685 | 122.2 | -2.33 | +0.22 | 0.932 | 48.3% | +7 | -156 | -60 | 46.4% | -0.55 | 7–4 (64%) | 5–2 (71%) | — | -1.48 |
| 25 | 2025 | 1815 | 146.4 | +0.46 | -0.46 | 0.975 | 49.9% | -81 | -8 | -40 | 56.5% | +0.37 | 8–9 (47%) | 11–3 (79%) | — | -0.90 | 2020 | 1604 | 116.6 | -2.26 | +0.47 | 0.833 | 46.5% | +9 | -85 | — | 30.8% | -0.92 | 1–0 | 0–1 | — | -0.61 |
| 26 | 2026 | 1705 | 127.8 | -2.57 | -1.57 | 0.906 | 48.1% | -46 | +109 | +56 | 41.3% | -0.73 | 4–9 (31%) | 7–4 (64%) | — | +0.48 | 2021 | 1605 | 116.5 | -0.68 | -0.97 | 0.898 | 47.9% | +84 | — | — | 50.0% | -0.05 | 1–1 | 1–1 | — | +0.08 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 1527 | 92.6 | -3.21 | -1.20 | 0.690 | 41.8% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.75 | — | — | — | +0.35 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 1465 | 95.0 | -1.47 | -1.25 | 0.791 | 45.8% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | +0.18 |
| Career | — | 1883 | 142.7 | -0.05 | -0.19 | 0.977 | 49.7% | -8 | -22 | -27 | 49.8% | -0.02 | 40–61 (40%) | 51–39 (57%) | 97.0 | -0.82 | — | 1774 | 127.1 | -1.05 | +0.63 | 0.958 | 49.1% | +38 | -134 | -60 | 47.8% | -0.21 | 18–12 (60%) | 12–9 (57%) | 109.8 | -1.76 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Margarita Gasparyan
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kristina Mladenovic | 2 | 1 | 3 | Mar 18, 2021 | H2H |
| Serena Williams | 0 | 3 | 3 | Sep 3, 2020 | H2H |
| Maria Sakkari | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jan 22, 2020 | H2H |
| Camila Giorgi | 1 | 2 | 3 | Aug 22, 2019 | H2H |
| Anna-Lena Friedsam | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jul 3, 2019 | H2H |