Dayana Yastremska
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jasmine Paolini | 1 | 6 | 7 | May 25, 2026 | H2H |
| Donna Vekic | 2 | 4 | 6 | Jul 7, 2024 | H2H |
| Shuai Zhang | 2 | 3 | 5 | Mar 5, 2026 | H2H |
| Magda Linette | 4 | 1 | 5 | Jun 21, 2025 | H2H |
| Ajla Tomljanovic | 3 | 1 | 4 | Jun 11, 2026 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC
Dayana Yastremska vs Monica Puig H2H: 0-1
Monica Puig holds a 1–0 lead over Dayana Yastremska in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Monica Puig leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Monica Puig won the 2018 Acapulco first round 2-6 6-4 5-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
0
–
1
1 main-draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Monica Puig | 2-6 6-4 5-0 | Dayana Yastremska | Match data | Feb 26, 2018 | R32 | Acapulco | International → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Hard |
Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | Olympics | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dayana Yastremska | #113 | #21 | 2,070 | 1,884 | 135 | 150 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Monica Puig | #1,073 | #27 | 1,570 | 1,843 | 139 | 140 | 49.8% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Dayana Yastremska | Monica Puig | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #338 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2017 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #184 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #211 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2018 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #58 | 1,730 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #124 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2019 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #22 | 1,822 | 0 | 3 | 2013 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #56 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2020 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #29 | 1,792 | 0 | 3 | 2014 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #59 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2021 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #99 | 1,692 | 0 | 3 | 2015 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #92 | 1,578 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2022 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #101 | 1,614 | 0 | 3 | 2016 | 41–24 | 63.1% | #32 | 1,770 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2023 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #102 | 1,669 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #58 | 1,724 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2024 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #33 | 1,648 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 18–14 | 56.2% | #53 | 1,780 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2025 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #27 | 1,816 | 0 | 3 | 2019 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #79 | 1,686 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2026 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #113 | 1,705 | 0 | 3 | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #105 | 1,623 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1073 | 1,619 | 0 | 2 |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Dayana Yastremska | Monica Puig | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 16 | 2016 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2017 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2011 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2018 | 9 | 6 | 15 | 60.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2019 | 23 | 14 | 37 | 62.2% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 2013 | 5 | 11 | 16 | 31.3% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% |
| 20 | 2020 | 10 | 9 | 19 | 52.6% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 9 | 12 | 21 | 42.9% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 21 | 2021 | 5 | 11 | 16 | 31.3% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 11 | 14 | 25 | 44.0% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 22 | 2022 | 7 | 10 | 17 | 41.2% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 2016 | 25 | 14 | 39 | 64.1% | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% |
| 23 | 2023 | 4 | 10 | 14 | 28.6% | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 17 | 15 | 32 | 53.1% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 24 | 2024 | 8 | 13 | 21 | 38.1% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 2018 | 17 | 12 | 29 | 58.6% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 25 | 2025 | 12 | 13 | 25 | 48.0% | 10 | 6 | 16 | 62.5% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | 2019 | 7 | 13 | 20 | 35.0% | 8 | 3 | 11 | 72.7% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 26 | 2026 | 6 | 12 | 18 | 33.3% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 2020 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 84 | 99 | 183 | 45.9% | 34 | 36 | 70 | 48.6% | 17 | 15 | 32 | 53.1% | — | 91 | 94 | 185 | 49.2% | 34 | 30 | 64 | 53.1% | 14 | 16 | 30 | 46.7% |
Performance Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 265/286 of Dayana Yastremska's and 252/279 of Monica Puig's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Dayana Yastremska | Monica Puig | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 16 | 2016 | 2/2 | 2.5 | 6.0 | 56.2% | 65.3% | 38.9% | 52.3% | 24.3% | 53.0% | 40.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2017 | 4/4 | 1.5 | 3.5 | 66.0% | 50.4% | 54.9% | 55.8% | 51.8% | 52.1% | 49.7% | 2011 | 1/1 | 2.0 | 7.0 | 59.8% | 64.5% | 41.2% | 53.8% | 50.0% | 55.1% | 45.8% |
| 18 | 2018 | 16/16 | 4.1 | 5.7 | 60.7% | 65.8% | 49.1% | 41.8% | 42.8% | 59.2% | 46.9% | 2012 | 1/2 | 4.0 | 3.0 | 50.0% | 62.5% | 53.1% | 75.0% | 0.0% | 57.8% | 30.0% |
| 19 | 2019 | 51/52 | 3.8 | 5.1 | 60.2% | 65.2% | 48.7% | 60.0% | 48.4% | 58.4% | 44.8% | 2013 | 27/28 | 2.7 | 2.7 | 62.4% | 62.4% | 51.4% | 41.8% | 51.2% | 58.1% | 43.0% |
| 20 | 2020 | 26/26 | 4.5 | 5.7 | 58.9% | 67.5% | 46.3% | 45.5% | 47.4% | 58.7% | 42.0% | 2014 | 33/34 | 3.1 | 4.4 | 59.8% | 66.4% | 46.7% | 51.1% | 46.9% | 58.4% | 42.7% |
| 21 | 2021 | 18/19 | 4.1 | 5.6 | 57.9% | 66.1% | 45.9% | 51.1% | 42.2% | 57.7% | 43.3% | 2015 | 32/38 | 4.4 | 4.0 | 60.7% | 65.2% | 51.0% | 50.2% | 49.1% | 59.4% | 38.4% |
| 22 | 2022 | 29/29 | 3.4 | 5.2 | 57.8% | 63.8% | 44.4% | 54.0% | 49.6% | 55.7% | 38.7% | 2016 | 52/65 | 3.1 | 3.6 | 62.0% | 64.8% | 49.8% | 58.7% | 46.5% | 59.0% | 44.7% |
| 23 | 2023 | 21/21 | 2.5 | 5.2 | 57.8% | 59.4% | 42.8% | 40.6% | 53.6% | 52.2% | 41.9% | 2017 | 39/41 | 3.3 | 3.4 | 60.1% | 65.6% | 47.8% | 54.0% | 45.1% | 58.7% | 42.8% |
| 24 | 2024 | 34/36 | 2.9 | 4.3 | 57.8% | 60.9% | 47.1% | 51.9% | 44.5% | 55.0% | 42.0% | 2018 | 31/32 | 3.0 | 3.4 | 61.3% | 67.1% | 45.7% | 52.7% | 48.6% | 58.6% | 42.1% |
| 25 | 2025 | 34/50 | 3.4 | 5.5 | 56.3% | 63.0% | 49.7% | 54.0% | 51.1% | 57.1% | 41.8% | 2019 | 33/35 | 3.3 | 3.6 | 62.5% | 66.1% | 48.0% | 60.1% | 51.9% | 59.1% | 44.1% |
| 26 | 2026 | 30/31 | 2.2 | 5.1 | 61.3% | 59.5% | 46.4% | 48.9% | 46.5% | 54.2% | 41.4% | 2020 | 2/2 | 1.5 | 6.0 | 64.6% | 55.7% | 28.2% | 29.8% | 28.6% | 46.0% | 34.8% |
| 28 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 1/1 | 0.0 | 5.0 | 60.3% | 51.2% | 33.3% | 53.8% | 33.3% | 44.1% | 32.7% |
| Career | — | 265/286 | 3.4 | 5.2 | 58.9% | 63.2% | 47.0% | 51.5% | 47.6% | 56.4% | 42.6% | — | 252/279 | 3.2 | 3.6 | 61.2% | 65.2% | 48.4% | 53.3% | 47.8% | 58.6% | 42.6% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Dayana Yastremska | Monica Puig | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 16 | 2016 | 1464 | 101.4 | -1.01 | -2.08 | 0.858 | 46.1% | — | — | — | 20.0% | -1.40 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.03 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2017 | 1462 | 104.9 | -0.92 | +0.23 | 1.038 | 50.9% | — | +57 | — | 50.0% | +0.50 | 1–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.10 | 2011 | 1492 | 103.5 | -1.04 | -2.47 | 1.020 | 50.6% | — | — | — | 33.3% | 0.00 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | -0.15 |
| 18 | 2018 | 1731 | 136.1 | +1.60 | +2.48 | 1.148 | 52.9% | +20 | — | — | 60.5% | +1.03 | 1–5 (17%) | 2–4 (33%) | 94.2 | -0.03 | 2012 | 1464 | 94.8 | -3.46 | -3.96 | 0.711 | 44.4% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | +0.17 |
| 19 | 2019 | 1822 | 150.9 | +1.72 | +2.31 | 1.077 | 51.7% | +13 | -207 | -152 | 60.2% | +0.63 | 5–9 (36%) | 6–5 (55%) | 95.7 | -1.96 | 2013 | 1571 | 123.3 | +1.46 | -0.93 | 1.027 | 50.5% | -93 | +68 | +69 | 50.0% | 0.00 | 3–7 (30%) | 5–3 (63%) | 101.7 | +0.09 |
| 20 | 2020 | 1792 | 146.0 | +1.19 | -0.19 | 1.016 | 50.4% | +18 | -118 | — | 52.5% | +0.16 | 5–4 (56%) | 5–5 (50%) | 100.7 | -1.02 | 2014 | 1615 | 129.5 | +1.33 | -0.33 | 1.027 | 50.6% | -75 | +119 | 0 | 48.7% | +0.15 | 4–6 (40%) | 4–3 (57%) | 102.0 | -0.29 |
| 21 | 2021 | 1693 | 125.3 | +1.13 | -0.92 | 1.021 | 50.3% | -17 | -2 | — | 47.7% | 0.00 | 1–7 (13%) | 4–4 (50%) | 91.7 | -0.11 | 2015 | 1579 | 121.9 | +0.62 | -2.26 | 0.948 | 49.1% | +9 | +55 | -13 | 42.4% | -0.19 | 3–8 (27%) | 5–11 (31%) | 91.9 | -0.38 |
| 22 | 2022 | 1614 | 122.9 | -0.45 | -2.85 | 0.874 | 47.6% | +13 | +47 | +10 | 43.1% | -0.63 | 5–6 (45%) | 7–4 (64%) | 100.8 | -0.44 | 2016 | 1771 | 137.9 | +2.19 | +1.46 | 1.092 | 52.0% | -9 | -57 | -89 | 58.9% | +0.70 | 12–5 (71%) | 3–4 (43%) | 108.8 | -0.14 |
| 23 | 2023 | 1669 | 127.5 | -3.00 | -0.65 | 0.875 | 47.1% | +26 | -37 | — | 31.3% | -1.19 | 1–5 (17%) | 2–4 (33%) | 92.8 | +0.36 | 2017 | 1724 | 133.3 | +2.17 | -0.36 | 1.036 | 50.7% | +15 | -63 | — | 47.4% | -0.04 | 8–9 (47%) | 5–3 (63%) | 101.4 | -0.88 |
| 24 | 2024 | 1649 | 136.0 | -0.99 | -0.74 | 0.933 | 48.8% | 0 | +39 | 0 | 45.1% | -0.28 | 9–5 (64%) | 7–5 (58%) | 105.5 | +1.15 | 2018 | 1780 | 137.8 | +0.96 | +0.23 | 1.017 | 50.5% | +6 | — | — | 56.5% | +0.25 | 6–5 (55%) | 3–3 (50%) | 101.8 | -0.76 |
| 25 | 2025 | 1816 | 146.4 | +0.46 | -0.46 | 0.975 | 49.9% | -83 | -9 | -41 | 56.5% | +0.37 | 8–9 (47%) | 11–3 (79%) | 106.2 | -1.05 | 2019 | 1686 | 127.3 | +1.69 | +0.90 | 1.076 | 51.5% | -34 | +39 | -64 | 50.0% | +0.35 | 4–8 (33%) | 3–6 (33%) | 92.6 | -0.89 |
| 26 | 2026 | 1706 | 127.7 | -2.66 | -1.59 | 0.905 | 48.1% | -45 | +110 | +58 | 41.3% | -0.73 | 4–9 (31%) | 7–4 (64%) | 97.2 | +0.44 | 2020 | 1624 | 94.4 | -0.47 | -3.91 | 0.644 | 40.5% | — | — | — | 20.0% | -3.40 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | +0.30 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 1619 | 101.3 | +0.44 | +1.01 | 0.584 | 39.3% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | -0.14 |
| Career | — | 1884 | 142.7 | -0.06 | -0.20 | 0.977 | 49.7% | -8 | -22 | -27 | 49.8% | -0.02 | 40–61 (40%) | 51–39 (57%) | 97.0 | -0.89 | — | 1843 | 134.9 | +1.52 | -0.09 | 1.029 | 50.7% | -18 | +21 | -39 | 50.3% | +0.16 | 40–50 (44%) | 29–34 (46%) | 100.5 | -1.10 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Monica Puig
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Samantha Stosur | 3 | 4 | 7 | Mar 22, 2018 | H2H |
| Julia Goerges | 3 | 3 | 6 | Oct 19, 2019 | H2H |
| Angelique Kerber | 3 | 3 | 6 | Sep 24, 2019 | H2H |
| Caroline Wozniacki | 3 | 3 | 6 | Sep 27, 2018 | H2H |
| Carla Suárez Navarro | 1 | 5 | 6 | Aug 24, 2018 | H2H |