H2H data updated: 2026-07-16 16:32 UTC
Dayana Yastremska vs Sara Sorribes Tormo H2H: 1-0
Dayana Yastremska holds a 1–0 lead over Sara Sorribes Tormo in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Dayana Yastremska leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Dayana Yastremska won the 2020 Palermo third round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
UKR
Age 26
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 29
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 6, 2020* | Palermo | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Dayana Yastremska | 6-3 6-4 | Sara Sorribes Tormo | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dayana Yastremska | #74 | #21 | 2,070 | 1,884 | 134 | 146 | 47.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Sara Sorribes Tormo | #212 | #32 | 1,760 | 1,857 | 144 | 145 | 49.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Dayana Yastremska | Sara Sorribes Tormo | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #338 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2017 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #184 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2018 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #58 | 1,730 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #181 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2019 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #22 | 1,821 | 0 | 3 | 2016 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #107 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2020 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #29 | 1,790 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #104 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2021 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #99 | 1,704 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #86 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2022 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #101 | 1,600 | 0 | 3 | 2019 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #84 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2023 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #102 | 1,669 | 0 | 3 | 2020 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #66 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2024 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #33 | 1,656 | 0 | 3 | 2021 | 31–18 | 63.3% | #36 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2025 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #27 | 1,816 | 0 | 3 | 2022 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #61 | 1,738 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2026 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #74 | 1,758 | 0 | 3 | 2023 | 19–9 | 67.9% | #48 | 1,789 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #106 | 1,710 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #290 | 1,618 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #212 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 |