H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Dayana Yastremska vs Shuai Peng H2H: 2-0

Dayana Yastremska holds a 2–0 lead over Shuai Peng in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Dayana Yastremska leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Dayana Yastremska won the 2019 Tianjin second round 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Dayana Yastremska
Ukraine Age 26 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Shuai Peng
CHN Age 40 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Dayana Yastremska #23 6-2 6-4 Shuai Peng #96 Match data Oct 11, 2019* R16 Tianjin International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Dayana Yastremska #47 6-1 6-4 Shuai Peng #129 Match data Feb 1, 2019* R16 Hua Hin International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Dayana Yastremska #113 #21 2,070 1,884 135 150 47.4% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Shuai Peng #820 #14 2,825 1,907 301 263 53.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Dayana Yastremska Shuai Peng
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 2001 0–1 0.0% #518 1,493 0 0
16 2016 0–2 0.0% #338 1,463 0 0 2002 0–1 0.0% #366 1,484 0 0
17 2017 2–2 50.0% #184 1,461 0 0 2003 0–2 0.0% #221 1,455 0 0
18 2018 9–7 56.2% #58 1,730 0 1 2004 5–4 55.6% #80 1,516 0 0
19 2019 31–21 59.6% #22 1,822 0 3 2005 20–16 55.6% #36 1,680 0 0
20 2020 14–12 53.8% #29 1,792 0 3 2006 18–17 51.4% #55 1,729 0 0
21 2021 7–12 36.8% #99 1,692 0 3 2007 19–17 52.8% #45 1,738 0 0
22 2022 12–17 41.4% #101 1,614 0 3 2008 25–23 52.1% #40 1,707 0 0
23 2023 5–16 23.8% #102 1,669 0 3 2009 23–22 51.1% #46 1,773 0 0
24 2024 16–20 44.4% #33 1,648 0 3 2010 15–13 53.6% #72 1,760 0 0
25 2025 28–21 57.1% #27 1,816 0 3 2011 48–23 67.6% #17 1,840 0 0
26 2026 11–20 35.5% #113 1,705 0 3 2012 22–23 48.9% #40 1,707 0 0
27 — — — — — — — 2013 18–18 50.0% #42 1,656 0 0
28 — — — — — — — 2014 28–22 56.0% #21 1,746 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 2015 6–7 46.2% #137 1,701 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2016 8–11 42.1% #84 1,660 0 1
31 — — — — — — — 2017 36–22 62.1% #27 1,794 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2018 1–9 10.0% #125 1,723 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2019 7–9 43.8% #109 1,670 0 2
34 — — — — — — — 2020 2–3 40.0% #117 1,627 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Dayana Yastremska Shuai Peng
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2016 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2002 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2017 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2003 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2018 9 6 15 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2004 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
19 2019 23 14 37 62.2% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2005 13 9 22 59.1% 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 2020 10 9 19 52.6% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — 2006 6 9 15 40.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
21 2021 5 11 16 31.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — 2007 14 13 27 51.9% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 2022 7 10 17 41.2% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 2008 19 16 35 54.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 2023 4 10 14 28.6% 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — — — — — 2009 17 14 31 54.8% 5 7 12 41.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
24 2024 8 13 21 38.1% 5 5 10 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2010 6 8 14 42.9% 9 5 14 64.3% — — — — — — — —
25 2025 12 13 25 48.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2011 32 15 47 68.1% 10 5 15 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — —
26 2026 6 12 18 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2012 16 16 32 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 10 12 22 45.5% 7 5 12 58.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 19 13 32 59.4% 6 7 13 46.2% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 6 5 11 54.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 8 7 15 53.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 29 16 45 64.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 0 4 4 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 7 9 16 43.8% — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 84 99 183 45.9% 34 36 70 48.6% 17 15 32 53.1% — — — — — 209 176 385 54.3% 68 64 132 51.5% 24 21 45 53.3% 0 2 2 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 265/286 of Dayana Yastremska's and 451/553 of Shuai Peng's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Dayana Yastremska Shuai Peng
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
16 2016 2/2 2.5 6.0 56.2% 65.3% 38.9% 52.3% 24.3% 53.0% 40.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 2017 4/4 1.5 3.5 66.0% 50.4% 54.9% 55.8% 51.8% 52.1% 49.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 2018 16/16 4.1 5.7 60.7% 65.8% 49.1% 41.8% 42.8% 59.2% 46.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2019 51/52 3.8 5.1 60.2% 65.2% 48.7% 60.0% 48.4% 58.4% 44.8% 2005 5/36 2.6 2.6 61.4% 60.8% 37.6% 50.9% 53.6% 53.2% 54.0%
20 2020 26/26 4.5 5.7 58.9% 67.5% 46.3% 45.5% 47.4% 58.7% 42.0% 2006 19/35 2.0 2.5 64.1% 56.9% 41.5% 48.6% 49.0% 51.0% 42.0%
21 2021 18/19 4.1 5.6 57.9% 66.1% 45.9% 51.1% 42.2% 57.7% 43.3% 2007 30/36 2.7 1.5 65.5% 61.9% 52.3% 56.6% 43.5% 58.3% 45.5%
22 2022 29/29 3.4 5.2 57.8% 63.8% 44.4% 54.0% 49.6% 55.7% 38.7% 2008 34/48 2.1 2.1 68.0% 60.8% 48.5% 49.1% 48.0% 56.8% 47.4%
23 2023 21/21 2.5 5.2 57.8% 59.4% 42.8% 40.6% 53.6% 52.2% 41.9% 2009 42/45 1.6 1.9 67.7% 60.9% 47.4% 48.7% 47.7% 56.5% 44.5%
24 2024 34/36 2.9 4.3 57.8% 60.9% 47.1% 51.9% 44.5% 55.0% 42.0% 2010 24/28 1.0 1.7 70.1% 61.3% 50.6% 44.9% 43.8% 58.0% 44.3%
25 2025 34/50 3.4 5.5 56.3% 63.0% 49.7% 54.0% 51.1% 57.1% 41.8% 2011 65/71 2.3 1.8 68.3% 66.5% 48.1% 53.5% 47.4% 60.5% 45.7%
26 2026 30/31 2.2 5.1 61.3% 59.5% 46.4% 48.9% 46.5% 54.2% 41.4% 2012 40/45 2.8 2.3 66.8% 64.1% 47.3% 44.4% 52.1% 58.4% 42.4%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 35/36 2.1 2.6 65.1% 62.3% 44.6% 52.6% 47.6% 55.9% 44.7%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 43/50 2.7 2.4 63.3% 64.2% 46.5% 53.4% 53.6% 57.5% 42.3%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 13/13 3.0 3.2 63.2% 59.9% 44.5% 44.8% 38.1% 54.2% 41.2%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 14/21 2.0 1.8 61.4% 60.2% 45.4% 54.0% 45.8% 54.7% 36.8%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 57/58 1.7 2.2 63.7% 63.7% 47.7% 55.3% 49.4% 57.8% 47.0%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 9/10 1.8 2.9 63.8% 60.8% 46.5% 57.7% 47.4% 56.2% 33.5%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 16/16 1.6 2.1 67.6% 62.3% 44.1% 51.6% 41.3% 56.1% 43.6%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 5/5 1.2 1.4 71.8% 63.2% 52.9% 53.4% 56.9% 60.0% 43.9%
Career — 265/286 3.4 5.2 58.9% 63.2% 47.0% 51.5% 47.6% 56.4% 42.6% — 451/566 2.1 2.1 66.0% 62.7% 47.2% 51.4% 48.0% 57.3% 44.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Dayana Yastremska Shuai Peng
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1494 102.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.19
16 2016 1464 101.4 -1.01 -2.08 0.858 46.1% — — — 20.0% -1.40 0–1 — — +0.03 2002 1485 102.4 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 — — -0.02
17 2017 1462 104.9 -0.92 +0.23 1.038 50.9% — +57 — 50.0% +0.50 1–1 0–1 — +0.10 2003 1455 96.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.25 — — — +0.22
18 2018 1731 136.1 +1.60 +2.48 1.148 52.9% +20 — — 60.5% +1.03 1–5 (17%) 2–4 (33%) 94.2 -0.03 2004 1516 114.6 — — — — +25 — — 50.0% +0.60 2–0 — — +0.25
19 2019 1822 150.9 +1.72 +2.31 1.077 51.7% +13 -207 -152 60.2% +0.63 5–9 (36%) 6–5 (55%) 95.7 -1.96 2005 1680 142.9 -0.36 +4.21 1.154 53.6% -27 -58 — 56.8% +0.53 2–6 (25%) 3–5 (38%) 95.0 +0.12
20 2020 1792 146.0 +1.19 -0.19 1.016 50.4% +18 -118 — 52.5% +0.16 5–4 (56%) 5–5 (50%) 100.7 -1.02 2006 1729 119.5 -2.95 -1.68 0.858 46.7% -74 -31 -96 53.5% -0.15 5–4 (56%) 2–1 (67%) 103.6 -0.81
21 2021 1693 125.3 +1.13 -0.92 1.021 50.3% -17 -2 — 47.7% 0.00 1–7 (13%) 4–4 (50%) 91.7 -0.11 2007 1738 140.7 +2.26 +2.00 1.092 51.8% -34 +14 — 53.2% +0.52 5–6 (45%) 2–3 (40%) 98.4 -0.16
22 2022 1614 122.9 -0.45 -2.85 0.874 47.6% +13 +47 +10 43.1% -0.63 5–6 (45%) 7–4 (64%) 100.8 -0.44 2008 1707 128.9 +0.94 +2.05 1.097 52.0% -3 -20 -79 53.3% +0.38 4–11 (27%) 7–3 (70%) 97.0 +1.57
23 2023 1669 127.5 -3.00 -0.65 0.875 47.1% +26 -37 — 31.3% -1.19 1–5 (17%) 2–4 (33%) 92.8 +0.36 2009 1773 142.5 +1.21 +1.78 1.022 50.6% +16 -138 — 52.0% +0.22 7–9 (44%) 6–3 (67%) 101.4 -1.70
24 2024 1649 136.0 -0.99 -0.74 0.933 48.8% 0 +39 0 45.1% -0.28 9–5 (64%) 7–5 (58%) 105.5 +1.15 2010 1760 128.8 +1.83 +0.38 1.056 51.1% +2 -76 — 51.6% +0.14 7–7 (50%) 2–3 (40%) 97.6 -1.67
25 2025 1816 146.4 +0.46 -0.46 0.975 49.9% -83 -9 -41 56.5% +0.37 8–9 (47%) 11–3 (79%) 106.2 -1.02 2011 1840 146.6 +4.59 +2.04 1.157 53.1% +11 -74 -116 64.2% +1.13 18–8 (69%) 7–9 (44%) 105.6 +1.38
26 2026 1706 127.7 -2.66 -1.59 0.905 48.1% -45 +111 +58 41.3% -0.73 4–9 (31%) 7–4 (64%) 97.2 +0.44 2012 1708 129.2 +1.71 -0.73 1.018 50.2% +13 +6 +50 52.0% +0.11 8–8 (50%) 5–5 (50%) 96.7 +1.22
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1656 128.2 +0.33 +0.95 1.015 50.5% -3 +77 — 50.6% +0.07 7–5 (58%) 3–3 (50%) 99.6 -0.24
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1747 135.0 +1.13 -0.79 0.996 50.1% -12 -53 +25 57.1% +0.46 7–6 (54%) 5–6 (45%) 99.7 +0.27
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1701 126.5 -2.49 +0.54 0.900 47.6% +36 — — 53.6% -0.04 1–3 (25%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.02
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1660 114.8 +0.32 -3.37 0.812 46.4% +54 — +28 41.5% -0.78 2–5 (29%) 3–4 (43%) 95.6 +0.09
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1794 144.9 +1.43 +3.25 1.114 52.3% +9 -153 -47 59.8% +0.67 9–7 (56%) 9–6 (60%) 102.1 -1.14
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1724 109.2 -0.92 -4.14 0.764 45.6% +31 -67 — 21.7% -1.91 0–3 (0%) — — -0.14
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1670 122.1 -0.89 +0.34 0.993 49.8% +20 — — 51.4% -0.34 1–4 (20%) 4–1 (80%) 97.5 +0.01
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1627 111.9 +1.00 -0.04 1.097 52.2% +20 — — 41.7% 0.00 1–1 0–2 — +0.30
Career — 1884 142.7 -0.06 -0.20 0.977 49.7% -8 -22 -27 49.8% -0.02 40–61 (40%) 51–39 (57%) 97.0 -0.88 — 1908 141.0 +1.33 +0.93 1.037 50.8% +2 -48 -41 53.9% +0.30 86–94 (48%) 60–55 (52%) 98.4 -0.11

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.