Dayana Yastremska
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jasmine Paolini | 1 | 6 | 7 | May 25, 2026 | H2H |
| Donna Vekic | 2 | 4 | 6 | Jul 7, 2024 | H2H |
| Shuai Zhang | 2 | 3 | 5 | Mar 5, 2026 | H2H |
| Magda Linette | 4 | 1 | 5 | Jun 21, 2025 | H2H |
| Ajla Tomljanovic | 3 | 1 | 4 | Jun 11, 2026 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC
Dayana Yastremska vs Viktorija Golubic H2H: 1-0
Dayana Yastremska holds a 1–0 lead over Viktorija Golubic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Dayana Yastremska leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Dayana Yastremska won the 2019 Wimbledon third round 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
1
–
0
1 main-draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dayana Yastremska | 7-5 6-3 | Viktorija Golubic | Match data | Jul 7, 2019* | R32 | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | Grass |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dayana Yastremska | #113 | #21 | 2,070 | 1,884 | 135 | 150 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Viktorija Golubic | #56 | #35 | 1,531 | 1,829 | 118 | 144 | 45.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Dayana Yastremska | Viktorija Golubic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2016 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #338 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2017 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #184 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2018 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #58 | 1,730 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2019 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #22 | 1,822 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2020 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #29 | 1,792 | 0 | 3 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #196 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2021 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #99 | 1,692 | 0 | 3 | 2014 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #205 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2022 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #101 | 1,614 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2023 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #102 | 1,669 | 0 | 3 | 2016 | 18–11 | 62.1% | #56 | 1,676 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2024 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #33 | 1,648 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #114 | 1,628 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2025 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #27 | 1,816 | 0 | 3 | 2018 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #104 | 1,577 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2026 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #113 | 1,705 | 0 | 3 | 2019 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #80 | 1,651 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #138 | 1,593 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #43 | 1,739 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #76 | 1,719 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #83 | 1,647 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #90 | 1,760 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #82 | 1,790 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #56 | 1,774 | 0 | 2 |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Dayana Yastremska | Viktorija Golubic | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 16 | 2016 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2017 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2018 | 9 | 6 | 15 | 60.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2019 | 23 | 14 | 37 | 62.2% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2020 | 10 | 9 | 19 | 52.6% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — | 2013 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2021 | 5 | 11 | 16 | 31.3% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2022 | 7 | 10 | 17 | 41.2% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2023 | 4 | 10 | 14 | 28.6% | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 9 | 8 | 17 | 52.9% | 7 | 2 | 9 | 77.8% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% |
| 24 | 2024 | 8 | 13 | 21 | 38.1% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 2017 | 7 | 10 | 17 | 41.2% | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 25 | 2025 | 12 | 13 | 25 | 48.0% | 10 | 6 | 16 | 62.5% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | 2018 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 26 | 2026 | 6 | 12 | 18 | 33.3% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 2019 | 7 | 8 | 15 | 46.7% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 12 | 9 | 21 | 57.1% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 9 | 10 | 19 | 47.4% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 2 | 7 | 9 | 22.2% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 9 | 8 | 17 | 52.9% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 9 | 11 | 20 | 45.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% |
| Career | — | 84 | 99 | 183 | 45.9% | 34 | 36 | 70 | 48.6% | 17 | 15 | 32 | 53.1% | — | 71 | 88 | 159 | 44.7% | 22 | 33 | 55 | 40.0% | 25 | 23 | 48 | 52.1% |
Performance Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 265/286 of Dayana Yastremska's and 247/262 of Viktorija Golubic's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Dayana Yastremska | Viktorija Golubic | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 16 | 2016 | 2/2 | 2.5 | 6.0 | 56.2% | 65.3% | 38.9% | 52.3% | 24.3% | 53.0% | 40.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2017 | 4/4 | 1.5 | 3.5 | 66.0% | 50.4% | 54.9% | 55.8% | 51.8% | 52.1% | 49.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2018 | 16/16 | 4.1 | 5.7 | 60.7% | 65.8% | 49.1% | 41.8% | 42.8% | 59.2% | 46.9% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2019 | 51/52 | 3.8 | 5.1 | 60.2% | 65.2% | 48.7% | 60.0% | 48.4% | 58.4% | 44.8% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2020 | 26/26 | 4.5 | 5.7 | 58.9% | 67.5% | 46.3% | 45.5% | 47.4% | 58.7% | 42.0% | 2013 | 2/2 | 1.0 | 4.5 | 55.2% | 73.4% | 46.9% | 58.3% | 47.2% | 61.7% | 38.4% |
| 21 | 2021 | 18/19 | 4.1 | 5.6 | 57.9% | 66.1% | 45.9% | 51.1% | 42.2% | 57.7% | 43.3% | 2014 | 2/2 | 0.0 | 4.0 | 63.3% | 54.9% | 33.1% | 37.1% | 55.8% | 47.0% | 54.7% |
| 22 | 2022 | 29/29 | 3.4 | 5.2 | 57.8% | 63.8% | 44.4% | 54.0% | 49.6% | 55.7% | 38.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2023 | 21/21 | 2.5 | 5.2 | 57.8% | 59.4% | 42.8% | 40.6% | 53.6% | 52.2% | 41.9% | 2016 | 28/29 | 0.8 | 2.8 | 67.8% | 58.2% | 50.1% | 47.4% | 46.4% | 55.6% | 46.5% |
| 24 | 2024 | 34/36 | 2.9 | 4.3 | 57.8% | 60.9% | 47.1% | 51.9% | 44.5% | 55.0% | 42.0% | 2017 | 26/26 | 1.0 | 3.7 | 66.0% | 57.1% | 45.1% | 48.9% | 47.8% | 52.9% | 43.8% |
| 25 | 2025 | 34/50 | 3.4 | 5.5 | 56.3% | 63.0% | 49.7% | 54.0% | 51.1% | 57.1% | 41.8% | 2018 | 13/13 | 0.8 | 5.2 | 62.6% | 59.3% | 39.1% | 50.7% | 41.1% | 51.7% | 43.9% |
| 26 | 2026 | 30/31 | 2.2 | 5.1 | 61.3% | 59.5% | 46.4% | 48.9% | 46.5% | 54.2% | 41.4% | 2019 | 25/25 | 0.6 | 4.3 | 65.4% | 54.2% | 41.8% | 55.5% | 61.5% | 50.1% | 47.0% |
| 27 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 3/3 | 0.7 | 6.7 | 58.6% | 61.8% | 35.2% | 49.4% | 28.9% | 50.4% | 39.6% |
| 28 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 34/36 | 0.6 | 2.1 | 70.3% | 61.2% | 45.0% | 54.1% | 46.5% | 56.5% | 46.2% |
| 29 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 36/37 | 0.6 | 2.4 | 67.9% | 56.8% | 42.8% | 48.0% | 51.8% | 52.4% | 44.4% |
| 30 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 16/16 | 0.6 | 2.6 | 66.9% | 59.0% | 42.3% | 49.6% | 41.4% | 53.8% | 39.8% |
| 31 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 23/25 | 0.6 | 2.0 | 70.3% | 56.5% | 44.4% | 43.8% | 52.2% | 52.7% | 43.6% |
| 32 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 15/24 | 0.4 | 2.7 | 68.8% | 58.6% | 44.1% | 45.7% | 49.0% | 54.3% | 41.1% |
| 33 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 24/24 | 1.0 | 2.4 | 68.5% | 58.6% | 46.9% | 52.5% | 52.1% | 54.9% | 45.8% |
| Career | — | 265/286 | 3.4 | 5.2 | 58.9% | 63.2% | 47.0% | 51.5% | 47.6% | 56.4% | 42.6% | — | 247/262 | 0.7 | 3.0 | 67.5% | 58.1% | 44.3% | 49.8% | 49.4% | 53.6% | 44.6% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Dayana Yastremska | Viktorija Golubic | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 16 | 2016 | 1464 | 101.4 | -1.01 | -2.08 | 0.858 | 46.1% | — | — | — | 20.0% | -1.40 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.03 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2017 | 1462 | 104.9 | -0.92 | +0.23 | 1.038 | 50.9% | — | +57 | — | 50.0% | +0.50 | 1–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2018 | 1731 | 136.1 | +1.60 | +2.48 | 1.148 | 52.9% | +20 | — | — | 60.5% | +1.03 | 1–5 (17%) | 2–4 (33%) | 94.2 | -0.03 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2019 | 1822 | 150.9 | +1.72 | +2.31 | 1.077 | 51.7% | +13 | -207 | -152 | 60.2% | +0.63 | 5–9 (36%) | 6–5 (55%) | 95.7 | -1.96 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2020 | 1792 | 146.0 | +1.19 | -0.19 | 1.016 | 50.4% | +18 | -118 | — | 52.5% | +0.16 | 5–4 (56%) | 5–5 (50%) | 100.7 | -1.02 | 2013 | 1506 | 100.5 | +0.18 | -2.72 | 1.003 | 50.4% | — | — | — | 60.0% | -0.20 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.07 |
| 21 | 2021 | 1693 | 125.3 | +1.13 | -0.92 | 1.021 | 50.3% | -17 | -2 | — | 47.7% | 0.00 | 1–7 (13%) | 4–4 (50%) | 91.7 | -0.11 | 2014 | 1516 | 104.8 | +0.79 | -1.20 | 1.032 | 51.1% | — | — | — | 50.0% | +0.67 | 1–1 | — | — | -0.09 |
| 22 | 2022 | 1614 | 122.9 | -0.45 | -2.85 | 0.874 | 47.6% | +13 | +47 | +10 | 43.1% | -0.63 | 5–6 (45%) | 7–4 (64%) | 100.8 | -0.44 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2023 | 1669 | 127.5 | -3.00 | -0.65 | 0.875 | 47.1% | +26 | -37 | — | 31.3% | -1.19 | 1–5 (17%) | 2–4 (33%) | 92.8 | +0.36 | 2016 | 1677 | 125.7 | -0.61 | +2.42 | 1.046 | 50.8% | -58 | -11 | -26 | 56.1% | +0.50 | 7–5 (58%) | 5–6 (45%) | 102.5 | -0.96 |
| 24 | 2024 | 1649 | 136.0 | -0.99 | -0.74 | 0.933 | 48.8% | 0 | +39 | 0 | 45.1% | -0.28 | 9–5 (64%) | 7–5 (58%) | 105.5 | +1.15 | 2017 | 1628 | 111.6 | -2.61 | +0.22 | 0.929 | 48.3% | -1 | -75 | — | 39.7% | -0.40 | 7–9 (44%) | 1–5 (17%) | 94.2 | -0.51 |
| 25 | 2025 | 1816 | 146.4 | +0.46 | -0.46 | 0.975 | 49.9% | -83 | -9 | -41 | 56.5% | +0.37 | 8–9 (47%) | 11–3 (79%) | 106.2 | -1.02 | 2018 | 1578 | 108.9 | -3.22 | -1.05 | 0.909 | 47.7% | +18 | -36 | — | 33.3% | -0.88 | 2–5 (29%) | 1–5 (17%) | 91.6 | +0.92 |
| 26 | 2026 | 1706 | 127.7 | -2.66 | -1.59 | 0.905 | 48.1% | -45 | +111 | +58 | 41.3% | -0.73 | 4–9 (31%) | 7–4 (64%) | 97.2 | +0.44 | 2019 | 1651 | 110.5 | -5.01 | +1.79 | 0.941 | 48.5% | +14 | -169 | +1 | 46.8% | -0.42 | 5–7 (42%) | 5–6 (45%) | 97.7 | +0.39 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 1593 | 112.9 | -1.93 | -1.00 | 0.798 | 44.8% | +16 | — | — | 25.0% | -1.50 | 0–2 | 0–2 | — | +0.19 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1739 | 137.0 | -0.30 | +2.74 | 1.062 | 51.3% | -47 | -136 | +50 | 54.8% | +0.27 | 6–8 (43%) | 6–3 (67%) | 101.8 | -0.76 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 1720 | 131.4 | -2.91 | +1.24 | 0.932 | 48.4% | +18 | -133 | +30 | 47.7% | -0.42 | 6–10 (38%) | 4–5 (44%) | 96.1 | -0.60 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 1647 | 111.3 | -2.48 | -1.86 | 0.862 | 46.9% | +28 | — | +120 | 35.3% | -1.27 | 0–2 | 2–3 (40%) | — | +0.06 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 1761 | 124.5 | -2.53 | +0.72 | 0.922 | 48.2% | +35 | -253 | -30 | 42.1% | -0.79 | 5–4 (56%) | 5–3 (63%) | 102.6 | -1.14 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1790 | 129.7 | -1.72 | -1.14 | 0.899 | 47.9% | +26 | -241 | — | 44.4% | -0.37 | 7–8 (47%) | 4–3 (57%) | 97.5 | -1.24 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 1774 | 134.0 | -1.73 | +2.14 | 1.014 | 50.3% | -31 | -90 | +69 | 49.1% | +0.23 | 5–4 (56%) | 1–5 (17%) | 98.7 | +0.41 |
| Career | — | 1884 | 142.7 | -0.06 | -0.20 | 0.977 | 49.7% | -8 | -22 | -27 | 49.8% | -0.02 | 40–61 (40%) | 51–39 (57%) | 97.0 | -0.88 | — | 1829 | 129.1 | -2.17 | +1.02 | 0.960 | 49.1% | -1 | -106 | +36 | 46.3% | -0.27 | 51–66 (44%) | 34–46 (43%) | 90.8 | -1.25 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Viktorija Golubic
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Madison Keys | 3 | 2 | 5 | Jul 6, 2023 | H2H |
| Iga Swiatek | 1 | 3 | 4 | Aug 6, 2026 | H2H |
| Yulia Putintseva | 3 | 1 | 4 | Oct 31, 2025 | H2H |
| Arantxa Rus | 3 | 1 | 4 | Feb 4, 2025 | H2H |
| Shuai Zhang | 2 | 2 | 4 | Jan 19, 2022 | H2H |