H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Denisa Chladkova vs Ekaterina Bychkova H2H: 0-1
Ekaterina Bychkova holds a 1–0 lead over Denisa Chladkova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ekaterina Bychkova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Ekaterina Bychkova won the 2005 Budapest third round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 47
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 41
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 28, 2005* | Budapest | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Ekaterina Bychkova | 6-2 6-2 | Denisa Chladkova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Denisa Chladkova | #655 | #31 | 983 | 1,740 | 129 | 165 | 43.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ekaterina Bychkova | #814 | #66 | 588 | 1,584 | 34 | 67 | 33.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Denisa Chladkova | Ekaterina Bychkova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #190 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1996 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #77 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1997 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #54 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1998 | 4–19 | 17.4% | #119 | 1,440 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #155 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1999 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #58 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #70 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2000 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #50 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 9–21 | 30.0% | #76 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2001 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #50 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #111 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2002 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #63 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #117 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2003 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #43 | 1,666 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #121 | 1,433 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2004 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #54 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #181 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2005 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #127 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #171 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #208 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #159 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |