H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Denisa Chladkova vs Iveta Benesova H2H: 3-1

Denisa Chladkova holds a 3–1 lead over Iveta Benesova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Denisa Chladkova leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Denisa Chladkova won the 2005 Miami first round 6-4 4-6 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Denisa Chladkova
CZE Age 47 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Iveta Benesova
CZE Age 43 Left-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 24, 2005* Miami WTA 1000 R128 Hard Denisa Chladkova #59 6-4 4-6 6-2 Iveta Benesova #50 Match data
Apr 17, 2004* Estoril WTA 250 QF Clay Iveta Benesova #60 6-2 6-2 Denisa Chladkova #55 Match data
Feb 13, 2003* Antwerp WTA 500 R32 Carpet Denisa Chladkova #49 6-3 4-6 6-2 Iveta Benesova #75 Match data
Aug 8, 2002* Helsinki WTA 250 R32 Clay Denisa Chladkova #102 6-7(4) 6-2 6-4 Iveta Benesova #113 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Denisa Chladkova #655 #31 983 1,740 129 165 43.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Iveta Benesova #671 #25 1,811 1,760 177 221 44.5% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Denisa Chladkova Iveta Benesova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1995 1–1 50.0% #190 1,507 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1996 4–2 66.7% #77 1,578 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1997 11–18 37.9% #54 1,576 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1998 4–19 17.4% #119 1,440 0 0 2002 6–9 40.0% #82 1,565 0 0
20 1999 18–15 54.5% #58 1,646 0 0 2003 9–19 32.1% #132 1,478 0 0
21 2000 16–19 45.7% #50 1,645 0 0 2004 25–19 56.8% #36 1,657 0 1
22 2001 17–20 45.9% #50 1,661 0 0 2005 21–27 43.8% #55 1,613 0 1
23 2002 10–14 41.7% #63 1,642 0 0 2006 17–21 44.7% #58 1,594 0 1
24 2003 20–19 51.3% #43 1,666 0 0 2007 6–14 30.0% #116 1,522 0 1
25 2004 21–20 51.2% #54 1,699 0 0 2008 20–17 54.1% #43 1,641 0 1
26 2005 7–18 28.0% #127 1,552 0 0 2009 29–25 53.7% #38 1,646 0 1
27 — — — — — — — 2010 18–24 42.9% #59 1,636 0 2
28 — — — — — — — 2011 16–24 40.0% #54 1,650 0 2
29 — — — — — — — 2012 10–17 37.0% #81 1,587 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 2014 0–5 0.0% #671 1,526 0 2