H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Denisa Chladkova vs Jana Nejedly H2H: 1-1

Denisa Chladkova and Jana Nejedly are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Denisa Chladkova leads 1–0 on clay, while Jana Nejedly leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Denisa Chladkova won the 2000 Roland Garros first round 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Denisa Chladkova
CZE Age 47 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Jana Nejedly
CAN Age 52 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Denisa Chladkova #42 6-3 6-4 Jana Nejedly #70 Match data May 31, 2000* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Jana Nejedly #139 4-6 6-4 6-2 Denisa Chladkova #49 Match data Jan 14, 1998* R32 Hobart International Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Denisa Chladkova #655 #31 983 1,729 129 165 43.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Jana Nejedly #914 #64 488 1,625 49 105 31.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Denisa Chladkova Jana Nejedly
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1995 1–1 50.0% #190 1,507 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1996 4–2 66.7% #77 1,578 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1997 11–18 37.9% #54 1,575 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1998 4–19 17.4% #119 1,439 0 0 1993 0–3 0.0% #328 1,462 0 0
20 1999 18–15 54.5% #58 1,636 0 0 1994 3–9 25.0% #139 1,467 0 0
21 2000 16–19 45.7% #50 1,643 0 0 1995 11–12 47.8% #82 1,580 0 0
22 2001 17–20 45.9% #50 1,651 0 0 1996 3–9 25.0% #130 1,552 0 0
23 2002 10–14 41.7% #63 1,638 0 0 1997 0–2 0.0% #137 1,541 0 0
24 2003 20–19 51.3% #43 1,665 0 0 1998 4–9 30.8% #75 1,556 0 0
25 2004 21–20 51.2% #54 1,697 0 0 1999 5–13 27.8% #88 1,496 0 0
26 2005 7–18 28.0% #127 1,552 0 0 2000 12–20 37.5% #69 1,528 0 0
27 — — — — — — — 2001 8–17 32.0% #96 1,520 0 0
28 — — — — — — — 2002 3–11 21.4% #233 1,423 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Denisa Chladkova Jana Nejedly
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1995 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1996 3 1 4 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1997 1 4 5 20.0% 5 8 13 38.5% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1998 2 6 8 25.0% 1 7 8 12.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1993 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1999 4 4 8 50.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1994 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — 2 4 6 33.3%
21 2000 9 8 17 52.9% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1995 9 9 18 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
22 2001 5 7 12 41.7% 11 8 19 57.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1996 2 6 8 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 2002 3 6 9 33.3% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1997 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2003 8 5 13 61.5% 9 10 19 47.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1998 2 4 6 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
25 2004 9 11 20 45.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1999 3 6 9 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2005 3 8 11 27.3% 2 8 10 20.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2000 7 10 17 41.2% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 4 9 13 30.8% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 3 6 9 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career — 47 60 107 43.9% 60 68 128 46.9% 12 16 28 42.9% 10 21 31 32.3% — 31 58 89 34.8% 8 22 30 26.7% 2 10 12 16.7% 8 15 23 34.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Denisa Chladkova Jana Nejedly
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1995 1507 99.1 — — — — — — — 50.0% -1.50 — — — +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1996 1578 111.0 — — — — +7 — — 54.5% +0.09 1–0 — — -0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1997 1575 112.6 — — — — -43 -13 +99 41.2% -0.60 4–6 (40%) 5–8 (38%) 96.5 +1.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1998 1439 95.8 — — — — +46 +12 +174 22.4% -1.92 2–3 (40%) 3–2 (60%) 100.1 +1.23 1993 1463 89.4 — — — — +32 — — 0.0% -4.33 — — — +0.21
20 1999 1636 129.9 — — — — -59 -17 — 52.1% +0.23 4–3 (57%) 5–2 (71%) 105.2 -0.19 1994 1468 119.4 — — — — +17 — — 28.6% -1.54 2–2 (50%) — — +0.14
21 2000 1643 131.0 — — — — -12 -10 — 47.6% -0.17 6–8 (43%) 5–5 (50%) 99.2 +1.37 1995 1580 127.6 — — — — -12 — — 49.1% +0.02 3–4 (43%) 1–1 — -0.69
22 2001 1651 135.1 — — — — -37 +64 — 46.3% -0.19 4–8 (33%) 2–4 (33%) 95.3 -2.05 1996 1552 113.3 — — — — +10 — — 34.5% -1.14 1–4 (20%) 0–3 (0%) 95.3 -0.52
23 2002 1638 123.6 — — — — -60 +75 — 45.5% -0.25 2–5 (29%) 2–4 (33%) 96.5 -1.33 1997 1541 109.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.75 — — — -0.12
24 2003 1665 133.0 -0.58 +0.63 0.946 49.5% 0 +6 — 50.6% +0.14 5–4 (56%) 3–3 (50%) 99.5 +0.29 1998 1556 109.7 — — — — +2 -49 — 31.0% -1.31 2–1 (67%) 0–2 — -1.14
25 2004 1697 124.8 +0.92 -0.86 1.000 50.1% -47 +20 -148 48.9% -0.10 6–2 (75%) 1–5 (17%) 101.9 -0.58 1999 1496 102.5 — — — — +42 -14 — 27.5% -1.72 3–1 (75%) 1–0 — +0.67
26 2005 1553 111.2 -1.78 -1.80 0.740 43.5% +28 +36 +9 28.6% -1.50 4–4 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 97.9 -0.90 2000 1528 107.0 — — — — -2 -12 -40 36.5% -1.16 7–3 (70%) 3–4 (43%) 105.5 +0.89
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1520 113.4 — — — — +22 -60 — 36.8% -0.88 2–5 (29%) 2–4 (33%) 96.7 +0.87
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1423 84.2 — — — — +66 — — 23.3% -1.97 1–1 1–1 — +1.39
Career — 1729 128.6 -0.37 -0.69 0.894 47.9% -20 +20 +31 44.3% -0.38 38–43 (47%) 28–37 (43%) 96.0 -0.37 — 1625 113.2 — — — — +15 -29 -40 34.0% -1.19 21–21 (50%) 8–15 (35%) 101.1 +1.10

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.