H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Denisa Chladkova vs Stephanie Foretz Gacon H2H: 2-1

Denisa Chladkova holds a 2–1 lead over Stephanie Foretz Gacon in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Denisa Chladkova leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Stephanie Foretz Gacon leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Stephanie Foretz Gacon won the 2005 Wimbledon first round 6-3 4-6 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Denisa Chladkova
CZE Age 47 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Stephanie Foretz Gacon
Age 45 Right-Handed 166 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 22, 2005* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Stephanie Foretz Gacon 6-3 4-6 6-1 Denisa Chladkova #65 Match data
Feb 20, 2004* Antwerp WTA 500 R16 Hard Denisa Chladkova #56 6-7(2) 6-4 6-4 Stephanie Foretz Gacon Match data
Jan 21, 2004* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Denisa Chladkova #43 6-4 6-2 Stephanie Foretz Gacon Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Denisa Chladkova #655 #31 983 1,740 129 165 43.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stephanie Foretz Gacon — — — 1,647 61 115 34.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Denisa Chladkova Stephanie Foretz Gacon
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1995 1–1 50.0% #190 1,507 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1996 4–2 66.7% #77 1,578 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1997 11–18 37.9% #54 1,576 0 0 1999 1–2 33.3% — 1,511 0 0
19 1998 4–19 17.4% #119 1,440 0 0 2000 1–2 33.3% — 1,513 0 0
20 1999 18–15 54.5% #58 1,646 0 0 2001 5–6 45.5% — 1,558 0 0
21 2000 16–19 45.7% #50 1,645 0 0 2002 11–12 47.8% — 1,605 0 0
22 2001 17–20 45.9% #50 1,661 0 0 2003 12–15 44.4% — 1,588 0 0
23 2002 10–14 41.7% #63 1,642 0 0 2004 3–10 23.1% — 1,532 0 0
24 2003 20–19 51.3% #43 1,666 0 0 2005 5–14 26.3% — 1,501 0 0
25 2004 21–20 51.2% #54 1,699 0 0 2006 5–14 26.3% — 1,444 0 0
26 2005 7–18 28.0% #127 1,552 0 0 2007 2–6 25.0% — 1,457 0 0
27 — — — — — — — 2008 0–2 0.0% — 1,455 0 0
28 — — — — — — — 2009 2–7 22.2% — 1,421 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 2010 0–3 0.0% — 1,402 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2011 2–6 25.0% — 1,406 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2012 10–10 50.0% — 1,514 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 2013 2–5 28.6% — 1,502 0 0
34 — — — — — — — 2015 0–1 0.0% — 1,492 0 0