H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC
Diana Shnaider vs Donna Vekic H2H: 2-2
Diana Shnaider and Donna Vekic are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Diana Shnaider leads 2–1 on grass, while Donna Vekic leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Donna Vekic won the 2025 Bad Homburg third round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 22
Left-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
CRO
Age 30
Right-Handed
179 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 2025 | Bad Homburg | WTA 500 | R32 | Grass | Donna Vekic | 6-3 6-3 | Diana Shnaider | Match data |
| Jun 17, 2025 | Berlin | WTA 500 | R32 | Grass | Diana Shnaider | 6-2 6-4 | Donna Vekic | Match data |
| Jan 17, 2025 | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Donna Vekic | 7-6(4) 6-7(3) 7-5 | Diana Shnaider | Match data |
| Jun 29, 2024* | Bad Homburg | WTA 500 | F | Grass | Diana Shnaider | 6-3 2-6 6-3 | Donna Vekic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diana Shnaider | #18 | #12 | 3,108 | 1,965 | 104 | 72 | 59.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
| Donna Vekic | #35 | #17 | 2,458 | 1,908 | 230 | 232 | 49.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Diana Shnaider | Donna Vekic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 4–1 | 80.0% | #108 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #96 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #82 | 1,550 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2023 | 16–11 | 59.3% | #93 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #103 | 1,606 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2024 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #13 | 1,942 | 0 | 4 | 2016 | 4–16 | 20.0% | #101 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2025 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #21 | 1,841 | 0 | 5 | 2017 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #55 | 1,669 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2026 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #18 | 1,874 | 0 | 5 | 2018 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #34 | 1,761 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #19 | 1,767 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #32 | 1,693 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #68 | 1,745 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #67 | 1,799 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #23 | 1,776 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #19 | 1,862 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #69 | 1,734 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #35 | 1,795 | 0 | 5 |