H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Diana Shnaider vs Laura Siegemund H2H: 0-1
Laura Siegemund holds a 1–0 lead over Diana Shnaider in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Laura Siegemund leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Laura Siegemund won the 2025 US Open first round 7-6(3) 2-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
RUS
Age 22
Left-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
GER
Age 38
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 26, 2025 | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Laura Siegemund | 7-6(3) 2-6 6-3 | Diana Shnaider | Match data |
| Oct 8, 2023 | Zhengzhou | WTA 500 | Q2 | Hard | Laura Siegemund | 6-2 3-0 (ret.) | Diana Shnaider | Match data |
| Mar 19, 2023 | Miami | WTA 1000 | Q1 | Hard | Laura Siegemund | 6-4 7-6(4) | Diana Shnaider | Match data |
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diana Shnaider | #18 | #12 | 3,108 | 1,965 | 104 | 72 | 59.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
| Laura Siegemund | #87 | #27 | 1,630 | 1,828 | 143 | 152 | 48.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Diana Shnaider | Laura Siegemund | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2023 | 16–11 | 59.3% | #93 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2024 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #13 | 1,942 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2025 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #21 | 1,841 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2026 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #18 | 1,874 | 0 | 5 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #220 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #98 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 27–17 | 61.4% | #31 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #69 | 1,792 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #113 | 1,691 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #75 | 1,666 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #51 | 1,762 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #125 | 1,727 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #177 | 1,652 | 0 | 2 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #86 | 1,784 | 0 | 2 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #80 | 1,738 | 0 | 2 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #46 | 1,803 | 0 | 2 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #87 | 1,748 | 0 | 2 |