H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Diane Desfor vs Pam Casale H2H: 1-1
Diane Desfor and Pam Casale are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Pam Casale leads 1–0 on clay, while Diane Desfor leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Diane Desfor won the 1981 Surbiton second round 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 71
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 10, 1981* | Surbiton | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Diane Desfor | 7-5 6-4 | Pam Casale | Match data |
| Apr 8, 1981* | Hilton Head | WTA 250 | R64 | Clay | Pam Casale | 6-3 6-2 | Diane Desfor | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diane Desfor | — | — | — | 1,796 | 69 | 89 | 43.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Pam Casale | #671 | #14 | 22 | 1,944 | 168 | 147 | 53.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Diane Desfor | Pam Casale | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 15–10 | 60.0% | — | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 30–17 | 63.8% | — | 1,811 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 20–23 | 46.5% | — | 1,746 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1974 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 23–20 | 53.5% | — | 1,769 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1975 | 5–3 | 62.5% | — | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 31–17 | 64.6% | #15 | 1,914 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1976 | 4–1 | 80.0% | — | 1,580 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 24–20 | 54.5% | #14 | 1,814 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1977 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,568 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #41 | 1,787 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1978 | 14–17 | 45.2% | — | 1,659 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #111 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1979 | 15–22 | 40.5% | — | 1,712 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #169 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1980 | 18–21 | 46.2% | — | 1,659 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #225 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1981 | 8–17 | 32.0% | — | 1,623 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #554 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1982 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |