H2H data updated: 2026-07-16 04:32 UTC
Diane Parry vs Lauren Davis H2H: 1-0
Diane Parry holds a 1–0 lead over Lauren Davis in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Diane Parry leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Diane Parry won the 2022 Palermo third round 7-6(5) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 23
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 32
Right-Handed
157 cm / 5'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 21, 2022* | Palermo | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Diane Parry | 7-6(5) 6-2 | Lauren Davis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diane Parry | #55 | #47 | 1,215 | 1,760 | 62 | 66 | 48.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Lauren Davis | #499 | #26 | 1,646 | 1,823 | 140 | 181 | 43.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Diane Parry | Lauren Davis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2019 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #338 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #301 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #319 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2021 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #115 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #91 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2022 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #112 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #70 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2023 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #79 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #55 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2024 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #63 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #88 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2025 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #124 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 12–9 | 57.1% | #61 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2026 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #55 | 1,742 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #50 | 1,634 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #173 | 1,610 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #64 | 1,733 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #75 | 1,622 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #89 | 1,646 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #87 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #68 | 1,681 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #270 | 1,625 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #362 | 1,593 | 0 | 2 |