H2H data updated: 2026-10-27 00:00 UTC

Dianne Fromholtz vs Barbara Jordan H2H: 1-0

Dianne Fromholtz holds a 1–0 lead over Barbara Jordan in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Dianne Fromholtz leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Dianne Fromholtz won the 1979 Hollywood round of 16 6-2 6-3.

AUS Age 70 Left-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
USA Age 69 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Dianne Fromholtz 6-2 6-3 Barbara Jordan Match data Jan 26, 1979* R16 Hollywood WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Dianne Fromholtz — #5 34 2,184 466 283 62.2% 0 0 0 2 20 22
Barbara Jordan — — — 1,704 65 102 38.9% 1 0 0 0 0 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Dianne Fromholtz Barbara Jordan
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1971 0–1 0.0% — 1,487 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1972 7–7 50.0% — 1,545 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1973 57–13 81.4% — 1,910 0 12 — — — — — — —
17 1974 52–20 72.2% — 1,971 0 16 1974 4–1 80.0% — 1,551 0 0
18 1975 34–29 54.0% — 1,904 0 16 1975 3–1 75.0% — 1,583 0 0
19 1976 39–13 75.0% #5 2,085 0 19 1976 1–2 33.3% — 1,573 0 0
20 1977 32–18 64.0% #8 2,083 0 19 1977 3–2 60.0% — 1,619 0 0
21 1978 28–13 68.3% #10 2,079 0 21 1978 0–6 0.0% — 1,531 0 0
22 1979 57–28 67.1% #6 2,016 0 22 1979 12–20 37.5% — 1,658 1 1
23 1980 46–21 68.7% — 2,015 0 22 1980 17–19 47.2% — 1,677 1 1
24 1981 13–19 40.6% — 1,740 0 22 1981 11–16 40.7% — 1,636 1 1
25 1982 16–15 51.6% — 1,786 0 22 1982 8–16 33.3% — 1,615 1 1
26 1983 7–13 35.0% — 1,691 0 22 1983 4–12 25.0% — 1,535 1 1
27 1984 3–3 50.0% — 1,717 0 22 1984 0–1 0.0% — 1,522 1 1
28 1985 17–17 50.0% — 1,794 0 22 1985 2–6 25.0% — 1,489 1 1
29 1986 19–14 57.6% #25 1,836 0 22 — — — — — — —
30 1987 19–13 59.4% #21 1,863 0 22 — — — — — — —
31 1988 14–14 50.0% #56 1,754 0 22 — — — — — — —
32 1989 6–10 37.5% #131 1,677 0 22 — — — — — — —
33 1990 0–2 0.0% — 1,634 0 22 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Dianne Fromholtz Barbara Jordan
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1971 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1972 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1973 — — — — 26 2 28 92.9% 30 11 41 73.2% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1974 14 2 16 87.5% 13 7 20 65.0% 19 9 28 67.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 1974 — — — — — — — — 4 1 5 80.0% — — — —
18 1975 8 8 16 50.0% 22 12 34 64.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 1975 — — — — — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% — — — —
19 1976 5 2 7 71.4% 10 1 11 90.9% 14 5 19 73.7% 9 5 14 64.3% 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1977 8 5 13 61.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 10 5 15 66.7% 10 6 16 62.5% 1977 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1978 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 17 3 20 85.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 1978 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
22 1979 13 10 23 56.5% 8 3 11 72.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 29 11 40 72.5% 1979 3 6 9 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 8 6 14 57.1% 0 4 4 0.0%
23 1980 9 4 13 69.2% 4 1 5 80.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 27 14 41 65.9% 1980 2 4 6 33.3% 9 6 15 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 7 12 41.7%
24 1981 2 3 5 40.0% 9 9 18 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1981 6 4 10 60.0% 5 7 12 41.7% — — — — 0 4 4 0.0%
25 1982 4 5 9 44.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 1982 1 3 4 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 4 5 20.0%
26 1983 0 3 3 0.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1983 1 4 5 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 1984 — — — — — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 1984 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
28 1985 8 6 14 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1985 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 1986 9 6 15 60.0% — — — — 5 3 8 62.5% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1987 6 3 9 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 9 5 14 64.3% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1988 9 10 19 47.4% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1989 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1990 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 104 81 185 56.2% 109 50 159 68.6% 142 76 218 65.1% 103 74 177 58.2% — 15 29 44 34.1% 20 29 49 40.8% 22 20 42 52.4% 6 22 28 21.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Dianne Fromholtz Barbara Jordan
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1971 1488 95.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1972 1546 117.1 — — — — — +12 +28 53.3% 0.00 0–2 3–1 (75%) — +0.81 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1973 1910 143.9 — — — — — +42 -25 74.7% +1.75 13–3 (81%) 5–2 (71%) 111.9 +5.47 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1974 1972 156.1 — — — — -98 -39 -12 69.8% +1.51 10–7 (59%) 8–4 (67%) 105.3 -4.03 1974 1552 111.5 — — — — — — +71 72.7% +2.00 1–0 — — +0.97
18 1975 1904 154.9 — — — — -40 +48 -25 53.8% +0.55 8–6 (57%) 2–8 (20%) 95.3 -9.51 1975 1583 110.0 — — — — — — +70 75.0% +1.88 — — — +0.71
19 1976 2085 162.7 — — — — -18 -56 -78 70.3% +1.52 9–7 (56%) 2–3 (40%) 101.2 -5.29 1976 1573 101.9 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.75 — — — +0.43
20 1977 2083 161.6 — — — — +1 -67 -19 61.5% +0.94 8–7 (53%) 6–4 (60%) 100.3 -4.49 1977 1619 117.5 — — — — — — — 63.6% +0.36 0–1 — — -0.49
21 1978 2080 150.6 — — — — -65 — +71 65.6% +0.99 9–3 (75%) 4–3 (57%) 103.7 -3.63 1978 1532 102.7 — — — — +2 — — 16.7% -2.17 0–2 1–3 (25%) — +0.84
22 1979 2016 168.3 — — — — +50 +21 +53 66.3% +1.40 8–12 (40%) 9–7 (56%) 96.6 -3.31 1979 1659 139.7 — — — — -114 -133 +100 40.8% -0.63 2–5 (29%) 1–4 (20%) 96.2 +0.18
23 1980 2015 158.3 — — — — +38 +67 +55 69.3% +1.36 5–7 (42%) 4–2 (67%) 98.3 -3.29 1980 1678 120.3 — — — — -142 -55 +52 45.7% -0.54 4–2 (67%) 6–3 (67%) 108.0 +0.91
24 1981 1740 124.8 — — — — +183 +184 +193 42.6% -0.43 1–5 (17%) 3–2 (60%) 91.7 +0.43 1981 1637 113.3 — — — — -30 -12 — 42.1% -0.65 1–2 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 98.9 +2.04
25 1982 1787 139.0 — — — — +85 +108 +114 48.5% -0.40 5–3 (63%) 4–0 (100%) 103.3 -1.68 1982 1616 116.0 — — — — -83 -27 +105 35.3% -1.12 1–2 (33%) 3–3 (50%) 98.5 -1.14
26 1983 1691 131.0 — — — — +58 +169 — 42.6% -0.34 1–6 (14%) 1–5 (17%) 88.7 -0.67 1983 1535 105.4 — — — — -45 — +159 30.6% -1.50 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — +1.12
27 1984 1718 126.0 — — — — — — +184 50.0% +0.36 1–1 0–2 — -0.61 1984 1523 98.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.08
28 1985 1794 143.9 — — — — -40 — +133 47.2% +0.17 4–4 (50%) 0–3 (0%) — -2.28 1985 1489 92.3 — — — — -27 — — 23.5% -1.94 1–0 — — +1.20
29 1986 1837 143.3 — — — — -10 — +86 55.6% +0.28 6–2 (75%) 4–6 (40%) 103.1 -2.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1987 1863 138.0 — — — — -28 -92 +94 56.7% +0.54 5–0 (100%) 2–2 (50%) 105.7 -0.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1988 1754 120.9 — — — — -21 — +153 49.3% -0.09 6–5 (55%) 1–3 (25%) 96.5 +1.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1989 1677 121.0 — — — — -25 — +183 43.6% -0.41 2–5 (29%) — — -0.73 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1990 1634 101.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–2 0–1 — +0.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2184 157.2 — — — — +7 +45 +35 60.7% +0.84 101–87 (54%) 58–58 (50%) 98.6 -4.59 — 1705 123.3 — — — — -80 -46 +102 40.9% -0.73 11–17 (39%) 14–16 (47%) 99.4 +4.13

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.