H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Dianne Fromholtz vs Pam Casale H2H: 1-1

Dianne Fromholtz and Pam Casale are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Dianne Fromholtz won the 1983 Marco Island round of 32 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Dianne Fromholtz
AUS Age 70 Left-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Pam Casale
USA Age 62 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Dianne Fromholtz 6-2 6-2 Pam Casale Match data Jan 25, 1983* R32 Marco Island WTA 250 Clay
Pam Casale 3-6 6-4 6-3 Dianne Fromholtz Match data Apr 10, 1981* R16 Hilton Head WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Dianne Fromholtz #306 #5 34 2,181 466 282 62.3% 0 0 0 2 20 22
Pam Casale #671 #14 22 1,944 168 147 53.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Dianne Fromholtz Pam Casale
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1971 0–1 0.0% — 1,487 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1972 7–7 50.0% — 1,545 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1973 57–13 81.4% — 1,910 0 12 1980 15–10 60.0% — 1,597 0 0
17 1974 52–20 72.2% — 1,971 0 16 1981 30–17 63.8% — 1,810 0 0
18 1975 34–29 54.0% — 1,903 0 16 1982 20–23 46.5% — 1,745 0 0
19 1976 39–13 75.0% #5 2,069 0 19 1983 23–20 53.5% — 1,770 0 0
20 1977 32–18 64.0% #8 2,077 0 19 1984 31–17 64.6% #15 1,914 0 0
21 1978 28–13 68.3% #10 2,076 0 21 1985 24–20 54.5% #14 1,814 0 0
22 1979 57–27 67.9% #6 2,015 0 22 1986 16–17 48.5% #41 1,787 0 0
23 1980 46–21 68.7% — 2,013 0 22 1987 5–11 31.2% #111 1,673 0 0
24 1981 13–19 40.6% — 1,739 0 22 1988 4–10 28.6% #169 1,552 0 0
25 1982 16–15 51.6% — 1,785 0 22 1989 0–1 0.0% #225 1,547 0 0
26 1983 7–13 35.0% — 1,690 0 22 1990 0–1 0.0% #554 1,525 0 0
27 1984 3–3 50.0% #138 1,717 0 22 — — — — — — —
28 1985 17–17 50.0% #97 1,793 0 22 — — — — — — —
29 1986 19–14 57.6% #25 1,836 0 22 — — — — — — —
30 1987 19–13 59.4% #21 1,863 0 22 — — — — — — —
31 1988 14–14 50.0% #56 1,754 0 22 — — — — — — —
32 1989 6–10 37.5% #131 1,676 0 22 — — — — — — —
33 1990 0–2 0.0% #306 1,633 0 22 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Dianne Fromholtz Pam Casale
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1971 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1972 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1973 — — — — 26 2 28 92.9% 30 11 41 73.2% — — — — 1980 8 7 15 53.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1974 14 2 16 87.5% 13 7 20 65.0% 19 9 28 67.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 1981 17 6 23 73.9% 7 5 12 58.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 3 5 40.0%
18 1975 8 8 16 50.0% 22 12 34 64.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 1982 2 4 6 33.3% 10 7 17 58.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 10 16 37.5%
19 1976 5 2 7 71.4% 10 1 11 90.9% 14 5 19 73.7% 9 5 14 64.3% 1983 5 5 10 50.0% 13 8 21 61.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
20 1977 8 5 13 61.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 10 5 15 66.7% 10 6 16 62.5% 1984 8 3 11 72.7% 8 5 13 61.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 11 6 17 64.7%
21 1978 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 17 3 20 85.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 1985 17 7 24 70.8% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5%
22 1979 13 9 22 59.1% 8 3 11 72.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 29 11 40 72.5% 1986 3 6 9 33.3% 11 5 16 68.8% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7%
23 1980 9 4 13 69.2% 4 1 5 80.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 27 14 41 65.9% 1987 3 5 8 37.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 1981 2 3 5 40.0% 9 9 18 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1988 3 6 9 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 1982 4 5 9 44.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 1989 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
26 1983 0 3 3 0.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1990 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
27 1984 — — — — — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1985 8 6 14 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1986 9 6 15 60.0% — — — — 5 3 8 62.5% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1987 6 3 9 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 9 5 14 64.3% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1988 9 10 19 47.4% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1989 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1990 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 104 80 184 56.5% 109 50 159 68.6% 142 76 218 65.1% 103 74 177 58.2% — 66 49 115 57.4% 55 41 96 57.3% 15 19 34 44.1% 25 35 60 41.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Dianne Fromholtz Pam Casale
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1971 1488 95.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1972 1546 117.1 — — — — — +12 +28 53.3% 0.00 0–2 3–1 (75%) — +0.81 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1973 1910 143.9 — — — — — +42 -25 74.7% +1.75 13–3 (81%) 5–2 (71%) 111.9 +5.78 1980 1598 118.7 — — — — +29 — — 57.4% +0.72 3–3 (50%) 1–1 — +2.02
17 1974 1972 156.1 — — — — -99 -39 -12 69.8% +1.51 10–7 (59%) 8–4 (67%) 105.3 -4.10 1981 1811 140.3 — — — — -1 -153 -196 64.1% +1.03 3–6 (33%) 6–0 (100%) 101.9 +1.97
18 1975 1904 154.9 — — — — -41 +47 -26 53.8% +0.55 8–6 (57%) 2–8 (20%) 95.3 -8.56 1982 1745 140.3 — — — — -54 -4 -106 50.5% +0.01 1–8 (11%) 9–5 (64%) 95.5 -3.37
19 1976 2070 160.7 — — — — -35 -42 -62 70.3% +1.52 9–7 (56%) 2–3 (40%) 101.1 -4.76 1983 1770 144.1 — — — — -55 +93 -103 52.1% +0.47 5–3 (63%) 3–3 (50%) 102.6 -1.57
20 1977 2077 161.3 — — — — -7 -60 -13 61.5% +0.94 8–7 (53%) 6–4 (60%) 100.5 -4.48 1984 1914 155.3 — — — — +6 -60 -210 64.8% +1.01 3–6 (33%) 7–3 (70%) 100.3 -2.46
21 1978 2076 150.6 — — — — -68 — +76 65.6% +0.99 9–3 (75%) 4–3 (57%) 103.8 -3.03 1985 1814 137.6 — — — — +80 -54 -188 53.1% +0.34 6–4 (60%) 3–3 (50%) 98.8 -1.08
22 1979 2016 167.5 — — — — +50 +20 +54 66.9% +1.45 8–11 (42%) 9–7 (56%) 97.0 -2.87 1986 1788 137.1 — — — — -56 +52 — 46.8% -0.18 7–4 (64%) 6–3 (67%) 103.7 -3.63
23 1980 2013 158.0 — — — — +36 +66 +56 69.3% +1.36 5–7 (42%) 4–2 (67%) 98.3 -2.56 1987 1673 114.3 — — — — -20 — -77 41.7% -0.56 3–5 (38%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.50
24 1981 1739 124.8 — — — — +183 +184 +193 42.6% -0.43 1–5 (17%) 3–2 (60%) 91.7 +0.06 1988 1552 100.5 — — — — +25 +207 — 36.4% -0.79 1–4 (20%) 1–2 (33%) 92.4 +1.01
25 1982 1786 138.8 — — — — +84 +108 +114 48.5% -0.40 5–3 (63%) 4–0 (100%) 103.3 -1.49 1989 1547 93.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.50 — — — -0.21
26 1983 1691 130.9 — — — — +57 +168 — 42.6% -0.34 1–6 (14%) 1–5 (17%) 88.7 -0.64 1990 1526 90.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — +0.21
27 1984 1717 126.0 — — — — — — +184 50.0% +0.36 1–1 0–2 — -0.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1985 1794 143.8 — — — — -42 — +133 47.2% +0.17 4–4 (50%) 0–3 (0%) — -2.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1986 1836 143.2 — — — — -9 — +88 55.6% +0.28 6–2 (75%) 4–6 (40%) 103.1 -2.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1987 1863 138.0 — — — — -29 -91 +94 56.7% +0.54 5–0 (100%) 2–2 (50%) 105.7 -0.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1988 1754 120.9 — — — — -21 — +154 49.3% -0.09 6–5 (55%) 1–3 (25%) 96.5 +1.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1989 1677 120.9 — — — — -25 — +183 43.6% -0.41 2–5 (29%) — — -0.70 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1990 1634 101.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–2 0–1 — +0.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2182 156.8 — — — — +4 +46 +38 60.7% +0.84 101–86 (54%) 58–58 (50%) 98.8 -4.11 — 1944 143.5 — — — — +1 +5 -153 53.9% +0.36 32–43 (43%) 38–21 (64%) 100.1 -2.42

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.