H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Dianne Fromholtz vs Pam Shriver H2H: 2-5

Pam Shriver holds a 5–2 lead over Dianne Fromholtz in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Pam Shriver leads 2–1 on carpet, while they are tied 1–1 on grass. Most recently, Pam Shriver won the 1986 Princeton quarterfinal 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Dianne Fromholtz
AUS Age 69 Left-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
2 – 5
7 main draw meetings
Pam Shriver
USA Age 64 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 8, 1986* Princeton WTA 250 QF Carpet Pam Shriver #6 6-2 6-4 Dianne Fromholtz #25 Match data
May 12, 1985* Australian Indoor WTA 250 F Hard Pam Shriver #9 6-3 6-3 Dianne Fromholtz #97 Match data
Nov 16, 1984* Brisbane WTA 500 R16 Grass Pam Shriver #3 6-3 4-6 6-4 Dianne Fromholtz #138 Match data
Sep 3, 1980* US Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Pam Shriver 3-6 6-1 6-1 Dianne Fromholtz Match data
Dec 6, 1979* Sydney WTA 500 R32 Grass Dianne Fromholtz 6-3 6-1 Pam Shriver Match data
Oct 4, 1979* Minneapolis WTA 250 R32 Carpet Dianne Fromholtz 6-7 7-6 6-2 Pam Shriver Match data
Mar 9, 1978* Dallas WTA 250 R32 Carpet Pam Shriver 3-6 6-4 6-3 Dianne Fromholtz Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Dianne Fromholtz #306 #19 34 2,167 466 282 62.3% 0 0 0 1 21 22
Pam Shriver #234 #3 163 2,302 624 277 69.3% 0 0 0 4 20 24

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Dianne Fromholtz Pam Shriver
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1971 0–1 0.0% — 1,487 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1972 7–7 50.0% — 1,546 0 0 1978 23–8 74.2% — 1,849 0 1
16 1973 57–13 81.4% — 1,911 0 12 1979 16–16 50.0% — 1,798 0 1
17 1974 52–20 72.2% — 1,963 0 16 1980 47–21 69.1% — 2,027 0 2
18 1975 34–29 54.0% — 1,906 0 16 1981 58–25 69.9% — 2,122 0 4
19 1976 39–13 75.0% — 2,063 0 19 1982 47–19 71.2% — 2,087 0 5
20 1977 32–18 64.0% — 2,074 0 19 1983 52–15 77.6% — 2,161 0 8
21 1978 28–13 68.3% — 2,049 0 21 1984 44–13 77.2% #4 2,060 0 10
22 1979 57–27 67.9% — 2,005 0 22 1985 54–13 80.6% #4 2,117 0 14
23 1980 46–21 68.7% — 2,009 0 22 1986 47–15 75.8% #5 2,194 0 16
24 1981 13–19 40.6% — 1,740 0 22 1987 60–13 82.2% #4 2,254 0 20
25 1982 16–15 51.6% — 1,786 0 22 1988 58–14 80.6% #5 2,188 0 24
26 1983 7–13 35.0% — 1,691 0 22 1989 24–14 63.2% #18 1,955 0 24
27 1984 3–3 50.0% #138 1,717 0 22 1990 8–5 61.5% #66 1,911 0 24
28 1985 17–17 50.0% #97 1,794 0 22 1991 21–18 53.8% #37 1,822 0 24
29 1986 19–14 57.6% #25 1,818 0 22 1992 25–18 58.1% #30 1,858 0 24
30 1987 19–13 59.4% #21 1,850 0 22 1993 14–13 51.9% #38 1,819 0 24
31 1988 14–14 50.0% #56 1,749 0 22 1994 13–16 44.8% #63 1,699 0 24
32 1989 6–10 37.5% #131 1,674 0 22 1995 7–11 38.9% #110 1,649 0 24
33 1990 0–2 0.0% #306 1,631 0 22 1996 4–9 30.8% #189 1,611 0 24
34 — — — — — — — 1997 2–1 66.7% #234 1,635 0 24