H2H data updated: 2026-10-29 00:00 UTC

Dianne Fromholtz vs Raquel Giscafre H2H: 0-1

Raquel Giscafre holds a 1–0 lead over Dianne Fromholtz in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Raquel Giscafre leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Raquel Giscafre won the 1974 Canadian Open round of 32 6-2 6-1.

AUS Age 70 Left-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Raquel Giscafre 6-2 6-1 Dianne Fromholtz Match data Aug 15, 1974* R32 Canadian Open WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Dianne Fromholtz — #5 34 2,184 466 283 62.2% 0 0 0 2 20 22
Raquel Giscafre — — — 1,798 86 120 41.7% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Dianne Fromholtz Raquel Giscafre
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1971 0–1 0.0% — 1,487 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1972 7–7 50.0% — 1,545 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1973 57–13 81.4% — 1,910 0 12 — — — — — — —
17 1974 52–20 72.2% — 1,971 0 16 — — — — — — —
18 1975 34–29 54.0% — 1,904 0 16 — — — — — — —
19 1976 39–13 75.0% #5 2,085 0 19 1968 5–8 38.5% — 1,494 0 0
20 1977 32–18 64.0% #8 2,083 0 19 1969 9–15 37.5% — 1,489 0 0
21 1978 28–13 68.3% #10 2,079 0 21 1970 3–2 60.0% — 1,504 0 0
22 1979 57–28 67.1% #6 2,016 0 22 1971 5–13 27.8% — 1,467 0 0
23 1980 46–21 68.7% — 2,015 0 22 1972 6–16 27.3% — 1,488 0 0
24 1981 13–19 40.6% — 1,740 0 22 1973 11–11 50.0% — 1,605 0 1
25 1982 16–15 51.6% — 1,786 0 22 1974 26–17 60.5% — 1,743 0 3
26 1983 7–13 35.0% — 1,691 0 22 1975 15–18 45.5% — 1,727 0 4
27 1984 3–3 50.0% — 1,717 0 22 1976 2–3 40.0% — 1,710 0 4
28 1985 17–17 50.0% — 1,794 0 22 1977 2–6 25.0% — 1,658 0 4
29 1986 19–14 57.6% #25 1,836 0 22 1978 1–8 11.1% — 1,557 0 4
30 1987 19–13 59.4% #21 1,863 0 22 1979 1–1 50.0% — 1,563 0 4
31 1988 14–14 50.0% #56 1,754 0 22 1980 0–2 0.0% — 1,540 0 4
32 1989 6–10 37.5% #131 1,677 0 22 — — — — — — —
33 1990 0–2 0.0% — 1,634 0 22 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Dianne Fromholtz Raquel Giscafre
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1971 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1972 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1973 — — — — 26 2 28 92.9% 30 11 41 73.2% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1974 14 2 16 87.5% 13 7 20 65.0% 19 9 28 67.9% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1975 8 8 16 50.0% 22 12 34 64.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1976 5 2 7 71.4% 10 1 11 90.9% 14 5 19 73.7% 9 5 14 64.3% 1968 — — — — 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 1977 8 5 13 61.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 10 5 15 66.7% 10 6 16 62.5% 1969 — — — — 9 14 23 39.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 1978 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 17 3 20 85.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 1970 — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 1979 13 10 23 56.5% 8 3 11 72.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 29 11 40 72.5% 1971 — — — — 3 8 11 27.3% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — —
23 1980 9 4 13 69.2% 4 1 5 80.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 27 14 41 65.9% 1972 1 2 3 33.3% 1 6 7 14.3% 4 7 11 36.4% — — — —
24 1981 2 3 5 40.0% 9 9 18 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1973 0 1 1 0.0% 11 7 18 61.1% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
25 1982 4 5 9 44.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 1974 1 1 2 50.0% 21 8 29 72.4% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 3 4 25.0%
26 1983 0 3 3 0.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1975 1 5 6 16.7% 10 8 18 55.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
27 1984 — — — — — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 1976 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
28 1985 8 6 14 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1977 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 1986 9 6 15 60.0% — — — — 5 3 8 62.5% 5 5 10 50.0% 1978 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 1987 6 3 9 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 9 5 14 64.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 1979 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
31 1988 9 10 19 47.4% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 1980 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
32 1989 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1990 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 104 81 185 56.2% 109 50 159 68.6% 142 76 218 65.1% 103 74 177 58.2% — 3 10 13 23.1% 67 66 133 50.4% 11 33 44 25.0% 5 9 14 35.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Dianne Fromholtz Raquel Giscafre
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1971 1488 95.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1972 1546 117.1 — — — — — +12 +28 53.3% 0.00 0–2 3–1 (75%) — +0.81 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1973 1910 143.9 — — — — — +42 -25 74.7% +1.75 13–3 (81%) 5–2 (71%) 111.9 +5.47 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1974 1972 156.1 — — — — -98 -39 -12 69.8% +1.51 10–7 (59%) 8–4 (67%) 105.3 -4.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1975 1904 154.9 — — — — -40 +48 -25 53.8% +0.55 8–6 (57%) 2–8 (20%) 95.3 -9.51 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1976 2085 162.7 — — — — -18 -56 -78 70.3% +1.52 9–7 (56%) 2–3 (40%) 101.2 -5.29 1968 1495 94.8 — — — — — -8 — 36.0% -1.24 0–1 — — -0.01
20 1977 2083 161.6 — — — — +1 -67 -19 61.5% +0.94 8–7 (53%) 6–4 (60%) 100.3 -4.49 1969 1490 111.5 — — — — — -2 — 40.4% -0.28 0–1 — — +1.55
21 1978 2080 150.6 — — — — -65 — +71 65.6% +0.99 9–3 (75%) 4–3 (57%) 103.7 -3.63 1970 1505 104.3 — — — — — +28 — 60.0% +1.10 — — — +1.15
22 1979 2016 168.3 — — — — +50 +21 +53 66.3% +1.40 8–12 (40%) 9–7 (56%) 96.6 -3.31 1971 1468 99.0 — — — — — +19 -2 32.4% -1.76 1–3 (25%) — — +1.07
23 1980 2015 158.3 — — — — +38 +67 +55 69.3% +1.36 5–7 (42%) 4–2 (67%) 98.3 -3.29 1972 1489 108.6 — — — — +89 -52 -8 31.8% -1.61 2–2 (50%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.68
24 1981 1740 124.8 — — — — +183 +184 +193 42.6% -0.43 1–5 (17%) 3–2 (60%) 91.7 +0.43 1973 1606 135.2 — — — — — +16 -154 52.5% +0.58 1–1 — — +1.82
25 1982 1787 139.0 — — — — +85 +108 +114 48.5% -0.40 5–3 (63%) 4–0 (100%) 103.3 -1.68 1974 1743 135.9 — — — — -177 +93 -251 59.1% +0.59 8–5 (62%) 4–2 (67%) 106.5 +0.88
26 1983 1691 131.0 — — — — +58 +169 — 42.6% -0.34 1–6 (14%) 1–5 (17%) 88.7 -0.67 1975 1728 134.7 — — — — -62 +89 — 47.3% -0.26 3–7 (30%) 1–3 (25%) 94.6 +0.05
27 1984 1718 126.0 — — — — — — +184 50.0% +0.36 1–1 0–2 — -0.61 1976 1711 111.5 — — — — — +87 — 40.0% -0.70 — — — +0.14
28 1985 1794 143.9 — — — — -40 — +133 47.2% +0.17 4–4 (50%) 0–3 (0%) — -2.28 1977 1658 103.2 — — — — — +95 — 27.8% -1.61 1–1 0–1 — -0.10
29 1986 1837 143.3 — — — — -10 — +86 55.6% +0.28 6–2 (75%) 4–6 (40%) 103.1 -2.36 1978 1558 94.8 — — — — — — -161 21.1% -1.95 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — +0.67
30 1987 1863 138.0 — — — — -28 -92 +94 56.7% +0.54 5–0 (100%) 2–2 (50%) 105.7 -0.46 1979 1564 101.2 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.60 1–0 — — +0.10
31 1988 1754 120.9 — — — — -21 — +153 49.3% -0.09 6–5 (55%) 1–3 (25%) 96.5 +1.13 1980 1540 91.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.25 — — — -0.26
32 1989 1677 121.0 — — — — -25 — +183 43.6% -0.41 2–5 (29%) — — -0.73 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1990 1634 101.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.33 0–2 0–1 — +0.25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2184 157.2 — — — — +7 +45 +35 60.7% +0.84 101–87 (54%) 58–58 (50%) 98.6 -4.59 — 1798 123.6 — — — — -73 +40 -101 43.7% -0.47 18–23 (44%) 7–8 (47%) 98.7 +3.19

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.